2012-2013 BOSS 302

After two years the Boss is indeed, dead?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 12:26 PM
  #121  
black_bullitt's Avatar
 
Joined: November 30, 2006
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 1
From: Spain
I think this thread has officially crossed the threshold into trollville.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 12:51 PM
  #122  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 01:01 PM
  #123  
11SHELBYGT500's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: March 9, 2011
Posts: 16,242
Likes: 6
Troll??
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 01:07 PM
  #124  
cinque35's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: February 9, 2006
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 1
From: NY
Trolls are people two
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 02:40 PM
  #125  
davesvt2000's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2011
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: Central Mass.
Originally Posted by 2 Go Snake
What a waste of resources to just make a model for two years.

The Boss 302 was about $5K over a GT, and the Laguna Seca was another $5K over that. So almost $10K over a loaded GT.

I think it's safe to say Ford made their money back on the development of these cars, and don't forget the parts (and their development costs) are now available thru Ford racing.

Trust me, Ford would NOT do any program that would lose money.

Last edited by davesvt2000; Nov 8, 2012 at 03:41 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 02:48 PM
  #126  
11SHELBYGT500's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: March 9, 2011
Posts: 16,242
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by davesvt2000

The Boss 302 was about $5g over a GT, and the Laguna Seca was another $5g over that. So almost $10g over a loaded GT.

I think it's safe to say Ford made their money back on the development of these cars, and don't forget the parts (and their development costs) are now available thru Ford racing.

Trust me, Ford would NOT do any program that would lose money.
K not g
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 03:43 PM
  #127  
davesvt2000's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2011
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: Central Mass.
Originally Posted by 11SHELBYGT500
K not g
Fixed, just for you

I always thought it was g for grand.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 03:55 PM
  #128  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
Originally Posted by davesvt2000

Fixed, just for you

I always thought it was g for grand.
Only for drugs

That way they don't get the money 'g' confused with the weight 'k' for kilo.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 10:51 PM
  #129  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by JPC
yes, just 2 years for the Boss 302....

BUT 2014 Boss 351 with Shelby's motor without blower...
any bets on that one?

Here's my guess:
Ford will make a 2014 Boss 351 525hp MSRP $55k++ only 1000 units...
.......this will clear out the 2014 before new body of 2015...........
Have you seen the pics over in the 2015 thread showing the mule with what looks like the next gen engine bay and front suspension. Mighty tight in there with the coyote V8, might be a wee bit to tight for the trinity motor?

Not that I wouldn't want a NA 5.8 in the next naturally aspirated SE Mustang.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 10:56 PM
  #130  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by cinque35
the '08/'09 Bullitt was only a one year production.. Jan-Dec '08

Speaking of which, wouldn't a next gen Bullitt be flat out awesome using the road runner V8 and 4 pot Brembos with 2 pot rears and targeting current Boss car performance. Hopefully Ford continues the Bullitt trend introducing it a few years into the production of the new car while we wait for the next big time SE.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2012 | 11:24 PM
  #131  
12C/OBoss's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 29, 2010
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by 2 Go Snake
It was nice of Ford to pay homage to the 1969 and 1970 Boss 302 with the recent production of the Boss 302. It gave older buyers an opportunity to purchase a Boss 302 that they may not have been able to buy in 1969 or 1970. However, Ford is missing an opportunity to attract a new generation of buyers by not offering a version of Boss 302 that does not have the stripe pakages of 1969 or 1970. What a waste of resources to just make a model for two years. It would have been so easy to have carried the Boss 302 over for one more year. The 2012 and 2013 models could be for the collectors . The third year model could be for the general populance. As far as I know, the CAFE standards are the same for 2013 as 2012. It just coud have been so easy to have the Boss produced for one more year. I always wanted a new version of Boss 302 that did not look exactly like the 1969 or 1970 Boss 302.

ha hmmmm....


http://www.insideline.com/ford/musta...2-in-2014.html



now may your posts from hence forth be of relevance rather than whatever you have been doing for 3 days
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 10:29 AM
  #132  
2 Go Snake's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2011
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 6
From: Minnesota
Cool

Great article. Good find. Now they can come out and say Ford promised only a two year production run for the Boss. Appears someone is trying to justify the discontinuation of the Boss 302. If it was such common knowledge that the Boss 302 was to be produced for only two years, why was it then necessary to send a bulletin to Ford dealers to inform them that the Boss 302 was deleted for the 2014 model year ? All the dealers should have already had that information.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 10:41 AM
  #133  
11SHELBYGT500's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: March 9, 2011
Posts: 16,242
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by 2 Go Snake
Great article. Good find. Now they can come out and say Ford promised only a two year production run for the Boss. Appears someone is trying to justify the discontinuation of the Boss 302. If it was such common knowledge that the Boss 302 was to be produced for only two years, why was it then necessary to send a bulletin to Ford dealers to inform them that the Boss 302 was deleted for the 2014 model year ? All the dealers should have already had that information.
I don't even like the Boss and I knew it was a 2 year deal
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 10:47 AM
  #134  
four-walling's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: October 3, 2011
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by 2 Go Snake
Great article. Good find. Now they can come out and say Ford promised only a two year production run for the Boss. Appears someone is trying to justify the discontinuation of the Boss 302. If it was such common knowledge that the Boss 302 was to be produced for only two years, why was it then necessary to send a bulletin to Ford dealers to inform them that the Boss 302 was deleted for the 2014 model year ? All the dealers should have already had that information.
Because somebody who was a Ford dealer in November was not necessarily a Ford dealer in October.

Folks buy/sell dealerships and there are employee staff changes all the time.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 10:58 AM
  #135  
max5ive0's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 19, 2012
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
From: Troy, MI
Bro, I knew they were promising a two year run when they were introduced. It was no secret, whether they officially announced it or not. Since then, owners have been wondering if they were going to keep to their word. So it seems that the general consensus is that enthusiasts were expecting only 2 years. It has happened, and is not a surprise. The only reason it may be news to the dealers and to the rest of the world is because most people, including most salesmen, know very little about the car, why it is different, and why it is limited. I had to explain to three different dealers about the red key. They had no idea what it was all about or how to install it. And, it is a very small niche market. Imagine you are a salesman and you are expected to sell a super high performing base car that is more expensive than your fully loaded GT with leather, technology and an already high performing potent V8, and it comes with summer only tires and no spare. 99% of your customers will probably walk by, think it looks sweet, but NEVER want to buy one. Watch Ebay, and you will see these cars sit. IMO, the Boss was not really intended to be a big seller. In fact, I would be surprised if they actually made much profit, considering they had to retrofit their engine dyno facilities to even test the engines to the higher RPM. Ford made an investment to show up competitors on the track. It was a huge marketing success for them, but I am sure they were aware it would not bring high volume sales.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 11:11 AM
  #136  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Either obvious troll is obvious or ignorant poster is willfully ignorant...

or maybe it's not so obvious troll?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 11:35 AM
  #137  
Flagstang's Avatar
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 9,651
Likes: 7
From: Sun City AZ
I do not know this is such a shock?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 11:37 AM
  #138  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
IBTL!
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 11:41 AM
  #139  
Flagstang's Avatar
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 9,651
Likes: 7
From: Sun City AZ
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2012 | 02:26 PM
  #140  
black_bullitt's Avatar
 
Joined: November 30, 2006
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 1
From: Spain
Originally Posted by bob
Speaking of which, wouldn't a next gen Bullitt be flat out awesome using the road runner V8 and 4 pot Brembos with 2 pot rears and targeting current Boss car performance. Hopefully Ford continues the Bullitt trend introducing it a few years into the production of the new car while we wait for the next big time SE.
Bob. Stahp!!

I gotta disease, and it can only be cured by more cowbell...

Or in my case, more special/limited edition Mustangs starting with the letter 'B'. I still need the '08 Bullitt, I'm gonna go broke!
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:44 PM.