Notices
2012-2013 BOSS 302

380 Torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11/12/10, 08:48 AM
  #1  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
Skotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 18, 2010
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
380 Torque

What do you all expect to see for Boss torque? What we have so far says 380 (est), which is actually 10 less than the 11 GT 5.0 rating.

Do you think it will have more torque across most of the RPM range but a lower peak?

Do you think the 380 is a very low estimate and the actual will be much higher?

I'd guess it's a little of both.
Old 11/12/10, 08:51 AM
  #2  
Mach 1 Member
 
12C/OBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 29, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skotty
What do you all expect to see for Boss torque? What we have so far says 380 (est), which is actually 10 less than the 11 GT 5.0 rating.

Do you think it will have more torque across most of the RPM range but a lower peak?

Do you think the 380 is a very low estimate and the actual will be much higher?

I'd guess it's a little of both.

The torque is rated lower partly due to the intake manifold design and revised cams. Better breather and power up top= a little less torque down low. The variable valve timing does wonders helping minimize the torque/hp/efficiency trade off but only can do so much. I personally would rather have a screaming top end all the way to redline and a slight loss in tq!!!
Old 11/12/10, 09:45 AM
  #3  
Bullitt Member
 
Dr Evil's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 17, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A little less peak torque at much higher RPM = alot more HP
Old 11/12/10, 04:14 PM
  #4  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Five Oh Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 14, 2007
Location: Pacific NW USA
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Dr Evil
A little less peak torque at much higher RPM = alot more HP
That's how my '07 GT is. 388 lb ft torque and 491 hp (at the flywheel and at 6600 rpm's). The old saying is that "hp sells cars, but torque wins drag races" yet my car runs 0-60 mph in 3.5 seconds and 0-100 mph in 9.5 seconds on the way to high 11's in the 1/4 mile, so torque isn't everything.
Old 11/12/10, 04:36 PM
  #5  
BOSS Member
 
LagunaBeach's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 21, 2010
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You don't even notice 10 ft lbs less, especially with the 3.73.
Old 11/12/10, 04:54 PM
  #6  
Cobra R Member
 
Whammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 17, 2007
Location: London, ON. Canada
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LagunaBeach
You don't even notice 10 ft lbs less, especially with the 3.73.
Yeah, it would be tough to feel the difference of only 10 ft lbs of torque. But that also has be scratching my head about the red key....it supposedly adds back those 10 lost lbs. But that doesn't seem to be a great deal of added performance. So hopefully there is a lot more to the red key than that.
Old 11/12/10, 05:03 PM
  #7  
Bullitt Member
 
Dr Evil's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 17, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LagunaBeach
You don't even notice 10 ft lbs less, especially with the 3.73.
bingo
Old 11/12/10, 05:07 PM
  #8  
Cobra R Member
 
fdjizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Torque goes down as revs goes up in most cases but that HP will def. get you down the track, look at the M3 with 400hp and 295lbs of torque, still runs 12's I do love me some low end torque though, but that's just me!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangGTCS13
2010-2014 Mustang
9
9/17/15 07:38 AM
SilverBullet13
2010-2014 Mustang
7
8/13/15 09:11 AM
dohc97
2010-2014 Mustang
2
8/7/15 06:27 AM



Quick Reply: 380 Torque



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:57 PM.