2012-2013 BOSS 302

302R Engine vs. Production Boss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 06:45 PM
  #1  
Dr Evil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 17, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
302R Engine vs. Production Boss

“The 302R engines come straight off our production line with the same short block,” explains Mike Harrison, Ford V8 engine program manager. “The forged pistons, stronger connecting rods and all the other refinements were already designed for racing, so it was straightforward to take what we learned on the track and apply it to the production car.”

This quote makes it seem as if the production car and 302R share the same engine, which I doubt. It does sound like they are VERY similar. I wonder if anyone know exactly what the differences are?
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 06:54 PM
  #2  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by Dr Evil
“The 302R engines come straight off our production line with the same short block,” explains Mike Harrison, Ford V8 engine program manager. “The forged pistons, stronger connecting rods and all the other refinements were already designed for racing, so it was straightforward to take what we learned on the track and apply it to the production car.”

This quote makes it seem as if the production car and 302R share the same engine, which I doubt. It does sound like they are VERY similar. I wonder if anyone know exactly what the differences are?
Same short block.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 07:03 PM
  #3  
Dr Evil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 17, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
that in and of itself is incredible but I wonder what else is the same vs. different. If the Boss had the exact same engine as the race car it would be incredible and probably the first time in a long time this could be said of any car.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2010 | 11:03 AM
  #4  
mkoesel's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
I have been wondering this same thing Dr Evil. With the announcement of the production road going Boss 302, I became even more intrigued and decided to drop by this site (I pop in every so often) specifically to try to find more info about this myself.

Unfortunately, exact specs and details of the "Roadrunner" race engine seem to be tough to find. In the 302R, it is tuned to an estimated 400hp according to the Ford Racing web site. For the 302R1 (the Grand Am version) no power output is mentioned on the web site. Either way, I'm sure these engines are tuned based on regulations or a handicap, and the power output in these applications is not indicative of the motor's true potential. For example, I know the 5.0 Cammer motor (which will soon be replaced in all applications by the new 5.0, I'd imagine) makes up to 550hp in certain applications, like the Roush/Yates version used in the FR500GT "Man Racer". I don't see why the new Boss motor should not be similarly capable.

I also wonder about engine RPM. The production Boss motor is said to spin up to 7500 RPM (estimated). That's up 500 RPM from the Mustang GT. Do the race engines spin even faster? I don't know, but either way, I think 7500 RPM of the production car is already higher than the Cammer in many of its race applications. Plus, the new engine has a longer stroke than the Cammer, meaning even higher piston speeds at a given RPM. That's no small feat considering this is being applied to a production car that needs to meet very high reliability standards. Still, it sounds like they designed this thing to be extremely tough, and I recall a quote from a past press release stating the engine could handle 8000 RPM easily. I figure that with the extra 500 RPM, and the cams and intake to make use of it, the engine should be capable of matching the Roush/Yates Cammer's 550hp no problem. In fact, I don't think that particular motor even spins at that high an RPM itself.

I must confess I have an agenda here. I really love the new Mustang, and would love to come back into the Ford fold for my next car in a few years. But, I don't want to give up the high revving V8 in my current car. Well, not that there will be any other alternatives out there soon anyway. Nevertheless, I am hoping for an 8000 RPM, 500 horspower naturally aspirated factory Mustang from Ford. I'm sure people will hit that with the Boss with bolts on and such, but it would be great to have that same thing in a warrantied car from the factory. Hey, the new Mustang GT had my eyebrows raised, and now the Boss has me drooling a bit. Now, I want to see them kick it up one more notch and sell me a car.

Last edited by mkoesel; Aug 15, 2010 at 11:05 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2010 | 11:14 PM
  #5  
Dr Evil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 17, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
I don't know where but I think I read the the 302R version is spun to 8400RPM. I also think the 302R makes 450HP with the restrictors per class rules regarding HP/weight. Someone correct me on this.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2010 | 11:41 PM
  #6  
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: February 18, 2010
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 1
From: S.E. Texas
In the engine profile article it says that Ford Racing got the first Boss 302 engines to come off the regular production lines to go directly into the race cars. Said they had ZERO failures and led more laps in competition with the new motors than any other cars in the series.

So, yes, the race engines are regular production Boss 302 engines just as they will be in the street cars. On the race cars of course they have no cats in the exhaust though so that would probably contribute a few HP.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 08:55 AM
  #7  
Dr Evil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 17, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ltngdrvr

So, yes, the race engines are regular production Boss 302 engines just as they will be in the street cars. On the race cars of course they have no cats in the exhaust though so that would probably contribute a few HP.
I also have separate confirmation the the production and race car share the same engine. WOW!
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 01:09 PM
  #8  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Originally Posted by mkoesel
..........stuff..........
Welcome back stranger!
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 01:39 PM
  #9  
Topnotch's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 2
From: NYC
BOSS Drive By....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FREr_ZmrKc0
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 01:41 PM
  #10  
Topnotch's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 01:42 PM
  #11  
Topnotch's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 06:22 PM
  #12  
todd03blown's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2009
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: South
Originally Posted by Topnotch
Those seats look great!!
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 12:55 AM
  #13  
Ice Hawk's Avatar
 
Joined: December 3, 2007
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Wow. Awesome!
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 01:16 AM
  #14  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
well if thats not awesome i dont know what is
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 01:24 PM
  #15  
mkoesel's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Boomer
Welcome back stranger!
Hey Boomer!

So are you getting a Boss? I have to say this is an impressive machine, at least on paper. And I'm sure it will live up to the hype once they are out and about and tested by the mags.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 01:37 PM
  #16  
mkoesel's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Amazing if true. Hopefully a future production version can go to 8000 RPM. One interesting fact is that the Coyote's stroke, at 92.7mm, is actually 0.1mm shorter than the stroke of the Audi V8 which revs to 8250 RPM in the RS5 and R8 and the Audi V10 which revs to a staggering 8700RPM in the Audi R8 V10. The point being that a high revving engine with this stroke is possible in a production car.

Originally Posted by Dr Evil
I don't know where but I think I read the the 302R version is spun to 8400RPM. I also think the 302R makes 450HP with the restrictors per class rules regarding HP/weight. Someone correct me on this.

Last edited by mkoesel; Aug 19, 2010 at 01:40 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2010 | 06:37 PM
  #17  
Automagically's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2010
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 3
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by Topnotch
I wonder if that is with the "street" set up or with the dumps open for the exhaust. Sounds incredible though!!
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 07:42 AM
  #18  
Falc'man's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Dr Evil
I don't know where but I think I read the the 302R version is spun to 8400RPM. I also think the 302R makes 450HP with the restrictors per class rules regarding HP/weight. Someone correct me on this.
It was dynoed at way over 500hp. The difference is mainly in the tune and rpms.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 08:58 AM
  #19  
LQQK's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 7, 2010
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Read this thread,,very interesting:

http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...-302-back.html

LQQK
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 09:05 AM
  #20  
Automagically's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2010
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 3
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by LQQK
Read this thread,,very interesting:

http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...-302-back.html

LQQK
Which part was interesting, the comments or the info in the first post? Seems like no more than posted here, maybe a bit less. At least comment wise.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:30 PM.