2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2015 Mustang - Media Reviews

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 08:55 AM
  #1  
Boomer's Avatar
Thread Starter
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Exclamation 2015 Mustang - Media Reviews

Placeholder until the news breaks

Get in, sit down, shut up, and hold on

Car and Driver:
GT: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t-drive-review


Motor Trend:
Eco4: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...23_first_test/
GT: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._gt_first_test

Road & Track:
GT: http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-revi...st-impressions

Last edited by Boomer; Sep 17, 2014 at 10:43 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 10:12 AM
  #2  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
Road & Track . .

First Impressions: 2015 Ford Mustang GT
There will be no “for a Mustang” disclaimers this time.
http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-revi...st-impressions
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 10:19 AM
  #3  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
Motor Trend . . .

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...gt_first_test/
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 10:59 AM
  #4  
Mrsuitcase's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 13, 2013
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Burlington
Seems to be nearly universal high praise. I thought it would review well, but not THAT well!

I even did a double take from this comment from one of the R&T editors:

"I drove the GT in a group that also included the Porsche 911 GT3, the Lexus RC F, and the Italian-superhero Ferrari 458 Speciale. It confidently, casually held its own in that heady company."
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 11:06 AM
  #5  
unnoticedtrails's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: April 27, 2004
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 65
From: Colorado
Much of the reviews I read are lukewarm. I was hoping for more out and out praise. It seems the car is a better handler but not to the degree everyone was expecting. Weight is an issue. The GT got slower. The Ecoboost is the lightest one. But, it still weighs almost 130 lbs more than the previous V6.

Last edited by unnoticedtrails; Sep 18, 2014 at 12:31 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 11:15 AM
  #6  
Mrsuitcase's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 13, 2013
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Burlington
Originally Posted by unnoticedtrails
Much of the reviews I read are lukewarm. I was hoping for more out and out praise. It seems the car is a better handler but not to the degree everyone was expecting. Weight is an issue. The GT got slower. The Ecoboost is the lightest one. But, it still weight almost 130 lbs more than the previous V6.
The Motortrend review does seem lukewarm compared to others I've read. They seem to be comparing the new V8 to the old Boss 302, though. And their ecoboost reception stems from dyno run testing.

It will be interesting to see more reviews.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 11:19 AM
  #7  
Mrsuitcase's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 13, 2013
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Burlington
From Consumer Reports on the Ecoboost

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/n...ideo/index.htm
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 11:20 AM
  #8  
DRB's Avatar
DRB
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 20, 2012
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
http://kinja.roadandtrack.com/the-20...856157/+travis

Last edited by DRB; Sep 17, 2014 at 12:24 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 11:31 AM
  #9  
MRGTX's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2010
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 15
From: CT
In a word: Tepid.

Some of the comments from the authors at R&T were glowing otherwise, not much happiness this afternoon. C&D's review was luke warm, MT was even harsh at points.

Youch.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 12:36 PM
  #10  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by Evil_Capri
Road & Track . .

First Impressions: 2015 Ford Mustang GT
There will be no “for a Mustang” disclaimers this time.
http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-revi...st-impressions
What a waste of 0's and 1's R&T. Pure gibberish
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 12:46 PM
  #11  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by Boomer
At its $45,885 as-tested price
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 02:31 PM
  #12  
TripleBlack14's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: May 22, 2014
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 118
From: Rockaway, NJ
Lame-O

Not the car, the publications. Not a single mention of the grille design!!!!!

Don't these snot-nosed, uppity, over-edumacated so-called automotive experts follow us here on TMS? Don't ya think that with all the bandwidth devoted to the F word grille that they would have noticed? Do they not know that we are the definitive word in Mustang land?

It's a travesty I tell ya. A travesty.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 03:07 PM
  #13  
dmichaels's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: April 14, 2013
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 111
From: CT
Interesting stats from Road & Track

Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 03:32 PM
  #14  
Von Bek's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 22, 2006
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cdynaco
For a fully loaded premium. Not exactly surprising.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 07:54 PM
  #15  
Boss 0960's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 23, 2013
Posts: 243
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Mrsuitcase
Seems to be nearly universal high praise. I thought it would review well, but not THAT well!

I even did a double take from this comment from one of the R&T editors:

"I drove the GT in a group that also included the Porsche 911 GT3, the Lexus RC F, and the Italian-superhero Ferrari 458 Speciale. It confidently, casually held its own in that heady company."
Universally? Here's a few quotes from some of the articles.

Motor Trend GT test. (I especially like this one)
Though it managed a higher average g on the figure eight than the Boss 302 -- which we'd still feel confident calling the best Mustang ever -- the 2015 Mustang didn't feel as nimble or competent as the Boss; it didn't feel like the front and rear ends were talking to each other. Turning in off-throttle resulted in moderate push (understeer from the front end), which needed to be corrected with the throttle. This, in turn, caused a bit of slushy oversteer that, while manageable, slowed the GT down a bit. While that's not bad per se, we were expecting a bit more from the new IRS-equipped Mustang....

The new 2015 Ford Mustang GT may not fully live up to the high expectations many had, given its similarities to the old Boss 302....

Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz3DcrlvKx4
From the other Motor Trend Ecoboost article
Considering the lack of weight on the nose, we expected a bit more nimbleness than this Mustang offered. It stops authoritatively and allows aggressive corner entry. Exits are fun, too; the car digs out of corners with a nice amount of stability. But mid-corner behavior is disappointing -- the car's attitude feels somewhat soft and soggy...

During testing of this turbo-four we noticed a strong mid-range but a soggy top end...

Stretch the tach upward, though, and once peak horsepower arrives at 5300, it's all downhill after. The last thousand rpm feel soft, and as a result, wringing it out during limit-handling tests or straight-line acceleration can feel a little unsatisfying. Short-shifting is an entirely viable option.

Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz3DctUaUXE
Road and Track
The first thing you’ll think when you sit in the new car is the same thing you thought when you saw the outside: whoopdie-doo, it’s a Mustang. Inside, it looks like a Mustang, feels like a Mustang, sounds like a Mustang, and smells like a Mustang. I was immediately disappointed.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-revi...st-impressions
Slushy, soft GT suspension. Soggy, disappointing Ecoboost suspension, soggy and unsatisfying Ecoboost high rpm performance. Immediately disappointed with interior. Comment on the exterior styling - Whoopdie-doo. These are not entirely satisfactory reviews. In fact, the only thing that is universally praised is the 5.0L engine and it's ability to drift through corners at will. If you didn't order the 5.0L, you are missing out on the best part of the 2015 Mustang.

Last edited by Boss 0960; Sep 17, 2014 at 07:56 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 08:12 PM
  #16  
DarrenGT's Avatar
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
Joined: October 16, 2012
Posts: 4,414
Likes: 215
From: Vancouver BC
Overall the reviews seem ok. Good enough for me to wanna test drive one when they hit the lot. I'm not an early adopter though. won't be buying generation 1, but i'll be keeping my eyes on them as they refine.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 09:07 PM
  #17  
Dave07997S's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
I am disappointed with the tests to be frank. Especially the Ecoboost 2.3L, I mean 310hp, 70 more rated hp than a BMW 328i and yet the Bimmer is just as quick. Did I mention the BMW is only 180lbs lighter. I don't know but I feel somewhat let down.

Dave
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 09:10 PM
  #18  
TheReaper's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 27, 2007
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 26
From: Southern Al
I'll wait for the 2017.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 09:23 PM
  #19  
todd03blown's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2009
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: South
Originally Posted by Boss 0960
Road and Track


Slushy, soft GT suspension. Soggy, disappointing Ecoboost suspension, soggy and unsatisfying Ecoboost high rpm performance. Immediately disappointed with interior. Comment on the exterior styling - Whoopdie-doo. These are not entirely satisfactory reviews. In fact, the only thing that is universally praised is the 5.0L engine and it's ability to drift through corners at will. If you didn't order the 5.0L, you are missing out on the best part of the 2015 Mustang.
Here is the whole part of that article that ties into the piece above.

Much to the aggravation of Web Director Alex Nunez, I’m just not a Mustang kind of guy. Yeah, I wanted a Fox-body 5.0 back in high school when they lived in new-car showrooms and I had never driven one. I’d find out later on that the intoxicating sound and butch looks weren’t enough to make up for how poorly it actually drove. The first time I drove something German and nimble, my pony-car fantasies subsided.

The last-gen Mustang was a boatload of fun—especially in Boss 302 form—and a few friends bought them with my honest blessings. That said, I can’t deny that much of my praise was given with a “…for a Mustang” disclaimer.

The first thing you’ll think when you sit in the new car is the same thing you thought when you saw the outside: whoopdie-doo, it’s a Mustang. Inside, it looks like a Mustang, feels like a Mustang, sounds like a Mustang, and smells like a Mustang. I was immediately disappointed. You know, because that sorta thing just isn’t my sorta thing.

It all changed the instant the wheels began to turn. It’s no exaggeration to say that the new car has kept everything I loved about the last car (that awesome 5.0-liter V-8) and vanquished everything I didn’t.

The Mustang is no longer aloof. It’s no longer distant, recalcitrant, or wooden. You start moving, and it feels like a compact car. The V-8 revs like a four-cylinder. Rather than denying them completely, the shifter encourages quick shifts. The clutch’s takeup is right where, when, and how you expect it to be. The steering is quick enough to be lively, relaxed enough not to be neurotic.

There’s power everywhere. And then there’s that new independent rear suspension. At long last, an independent rear. What that means, mostly, is that there’s finally a Mustang that rides well without being simultaneously harsh and floaty. And it puts power down like a champ—no longer just in a straight line, but on corner exit, too.

Power slides are (duh) a stab of the right foot away – and they’re incredibly easy to manage. The Mustang has become an American, V-8-powered, rear-wheel-drive VW GTI in that its limits are obscenely accessible. It encourages you to touch them. Repeatedly.

On a road loop with blind corners and variable pavement, I practically lit the GT’s brakes on fire. Not because the enormous Brembos were undersize or received too little cooling air. I was driving like a maniac, flat-out where I could see straight ahead, sideways where I couldn’t. I was once again a teenager with a smile on my face and a license that could (and probably should) be revoked at any instant.

The 5.0 is torque everywhere and now makes 435 hp. That’s more than double what the old pushrod 302 made when I wanted one. The only thing this engine doesn’t make enough of is noise. It’s too quiet. For a Mustang.

And that’s the only time you’ll hear the words “…for a Mustang” from me.

Jason Cammisa Senior Editor
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2014 | 11:06 PM
  #20  
Dave07997S's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
I will have to wait for a SE Mustang before I even consider getting out of my 2013 E92 M3. The GT350 seems to be the ticket, I was hoping as some of the other people had said earlier, for more of a glowing review. I really want to see if the PP Mustang GT is going to be quicker around Laguna Seca than the Boss LS. That should be one of the first test that is done...

Dave
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 PM.