Maybe its just me but why do this?
#21
GT Member
Join Date: June 12, 2013
Location: Indiana
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
disagree there.. if its not functional then its just for looks, cheap looks, because there usually IS a functional option, but people will get the plastic parts cause its cheaper. and if its just cheap looks, then its the same principle as ricing out the car.. or plastic dip. if ANYTHING, fake plastic parts whether professionally painted or not, are way more ricer than plastic dip. when you go to get stuff painted, even then theres different paint options available, so plastic dips could be the cheapo option. who knows plastic dip maybe even look good if done well. Personally I don't like it though
for example there's fake hood scoops.. cheap version of just buying a real hood with the functional heat extractors. personally I like the look of the side scoops for example, but when I saw they were just basically plastic parts glued to the side, I didn't get them cause I thought it was cheap. maybe from a distance it looks good, but up close its pretty lame IMO. don't see how one could bash plastic dip(which I agree is lame/cheap), and yet be okay with plastic parts. you said its not about it being functional its about it being tasteful... if that's the case then, it really is according to what a person likes. maybe for you its not tasteful and looks cheap(for me too), but for others maybe they like it and it looks like quality stuff(you can't dispute this because you just said about how tastefully it is done/looks, which comes down to opinion not actual quality work done. even with quality work its debatable.. it could be quality work, and still look like crap to one guy and awesome to another. like plastic parts...). seemingly for you nonfunctional plastic parts is tasteful, for me its lame/cheap.
I don't like how the car in the OP ended up looking, especially knowing its plastic dip, and that it was a GT500
but its not my car, so if the guys happy with it, eh, its his car not mine
#22
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: July 3, 2013
Location: LA, SoCal
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is not about whether it is plastic or sheet metal or whatever you wanna make it out of. Hell there is so much plastic on EVERY make and model of car factory. It is plastic dip has a horrible texture and starts to peel and crack. Most people use it to paint emblems etc. I myself have even used it on my 07 GT. I even plastic dipped my wheels. Bad idea. It is a **** product and doesnt hold up as well as most think. I swore I would never use it again and obviously I havent on my 13. You cant really argue "functional" vs "nonfunctional" window louvers because they are purely cosmetic. It isnt like someone can go buy functional window louvers. Just as plastic dip is cosmetic..but the plastic parts made by A.M. or whoever will hold up a hell of a lot longer than plastic dipped factory parts. Yea your parts will still be there but you will dip and re-dip. And last but not least ALL of our cars are about what we ourselves like and what we think is tastefully done. IMO plastic dip will NEVER be ok.
#23
Mach 1 Member
Ugh, plasti dip. 99% of the people here plasti dip it seems like. I think 1 or 2 pics I've seen from people here did a great job, the rest look like crap. Ill send some tissues for any offense I've caused.
#24
Mach 1 Member
Love the color, hate that it is plastidip.
I don't like it ,because personally I like to have things permanent, not temporary or something that can come off or waste away.
I don't like it ,because personally I like to have things permanent, not temporary or something that can come off or waste away.
#26
V6 Member
Join Date: July 17, 2012
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you plati-dip your mustang and then peel off the plasti-dip and reassemble it with 4 wheels, does that mean you have 2 Mustangs???
But seriously, I have seen some tasteful things in plasti-dip, but the whole car is way too much IMO. Why not just paint the car with matte orange paint instead? I'm willing to bet that would look a **** ton better.
But seriously, I have seen some tasteful things in plasti-dip, but the whole car is way too much IMO. Why not just paint the car with matte orange paint instead? I'm willing to bet that would look a **** ton better.
#28
GT Member
Yeah, for the whole body I'd do it right and get a wrap.
I plastidipped my 5.0 badges and front pony and I'm in the agreement that no matter how good a job you do, it looks cheap when you look at it closely.
I plastidipped my 5.0 badges and front pony and I'm in the agreement that no matter how good a job you do, it looks cheap when you look at it closely.
#29
Wow the hatred is strong in this thread.
Plastidip= $500
Wrap = $3000-$4500
Paint = $6k - $10k+
If someone wanted to "see" if they liked the color or new it was just for fun and wasn't going to keep it that color, why spend the extra money?
Plastidip= $500
Wrap = $3000-$4500
Paint = $6k - $10k+
If someone wanted to "see" if they liked the color or new it was just for fun and wasn't going to keep it that color, why spend the extra money?
#31
Like Father...
I ♥ Sausage
I ♥ Sausage
Or they could just photoshop a picture of it.
#33
Member
Join Date: August 24, 2013
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Correct me if im Wrong but isnt Plasti-Dip originally made for giving tools a grip? for example your wrenches or hammer? Now they have many uses for it, ie liquid electrical tape, just covering anything in plastic... and anything else u can imagine
#34
Shelby GT500 Member
i would love to do something like this for 500 - 600$ n be peelable to come back to stock after i get bored by it... i like the new metallic dip stuff that is coming out...
#35
disagree there.. if its not functional then its just for looks, cheap looks, because there usually IS a functional option, but people will get the plastic parts cause its cheaper. and if its just cheap looks, then its the same principle as ricing out the car.. or plastic dip. if ANYTHING, fake plastic parts whether professionally painted or not, are way more ricer than plastic dip. when you go to get stuff painted, even then theres different paint options available, so plastic dips could be the cheapo option. who knows plastic dip maybe even look good if done well. Personally I don't like it though
for example there's fake hood scoops.. cheap version of just buying a real hood with the functional heat extractors. personally I like the look of the side scoops for example, but when I saw they were just basically plastic parts glued to the side, I didn't get them cause I thought it was cheap. maybe from a distance it looks good, but up close its pretty lame IMO. don't see how one could bash plastic dip(which I agree is lame/cheap), and yet be okay with plastic parts. you said its not about it being functional its about it being tasteful... if that's the case then, it really is according to what a person likes. maybe for you its not tasteful and looks cheap(for me too), but for others maybe they like it and it looks like quality stuff(you can't dispute this because you just said about how tastefully it is done/looks, which comes down to opinion not actual quality work done. even with quality work its debatable.. it could be quality work, and still look like crap to one guy and awesome to another. like plastic parts...). seemingly for you nonfunctional plastic parts is tasteful, for me its lame/cheap.
I don't like how the car in the OP ended up looking, especially knowing its plastic dip, and that it was a GT500
but its not my car, so if the guys happy with it, eh, its his car not mine
#36
GT Member
Not a Plasti dip fan here, don't like the way it looks. For the pic in the OP, I don't care for it although I do like the color.
As for louvers, scoops or whatever, who cares if it's functional or not?
There are plenty of classic cars with non-functional things on them. If someone likes it and it looks good what's the difference? This would be a real boring place if everyone's car looked the same.
Just do what you want on your car and if you're happy, it works.
As for louvers, scoops or whatever, who cares if it's functional or not?
There are plenty of classic cars with non-functional things on them. If someone likes it and it looks good what's the difference? This would be a real boring place if everyone's car looked the same.
Just do what you want on your car and if you're happy, it works.
#37
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: July 3, 2013
Location: LA, SoCal
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but again, its not my car, so let him enjoy. im sure theres probably some stuff people don't like on my car, but I don't care, they really shouldn't either, cause its my car not there's.
#38
Cobra R Member
Join Date: September 22, 2012
Location: Ontario, California
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
17 Posts
I know that on this site ricer is a huge insult. I like many ricer things. I like low riders. I like pretty much every style of car. They all have something special if executed properly. I have always thought that scoops that don't work or brake vents that don't lead to brakes are rice. I like them and don't see it as a bad thing.