5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

tunes gone wrong

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 7, 2011 | 12:55 PM
  #21  
mystickeith50's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 2, 2010
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
Originally Posted by 05-1947
I has nothing to do with the with the hardware (Diablo or SCT).
Agreed
Reply
Old May 11, 2011 | 08:32 AM
  #22  
Five Oh Brian's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: November 14, 2007
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 8
From: Pacific NW USA
Originally Posted by 05-1947
I has nothing to do with the with the hardware (Diablo or SCT).
Posted in another thread, it appears that the tuners out there are reverting back to OEM knock sensor settings to prevent this from happening again. So, tuners looked to have been too aggressive by not allowing the ECU to retard timing (enough) when detonation was being detected.
Reply
Old May 11, 2011 | 10:46 AM
  #23  
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2008
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
From the lips of a Tuner.

The reason the cylinders let loose are not KS caused. Its Cheap Gas, not running the correct octane for the boost. Or simply the tunes were run slightly lean and used basic value files instead of actual dyno driven tunes.

The Knock Sensor senativity was not changed the ability to pull global knock or individual knock. Ford says #8 does get heard as well for Knock if it exist and to leave the KS in global knock status meaning 1 cylinder knocks, Spark gets pulled on all cylinders instead of spark being pulled at individual cylinders.

Solution...... Don't get knock. Run 93 from a Shell or Sunoco. Other solution. Race Track, Race Gas , Race Tune..... Run Octane while beating the car at the track.

I would have to send out over 500 tune updates. As I have had no one Blow up. I also don't run as much overall spark as some other shops and I run the cars Commanded Fuel Richer.

Also I suspect the cars that had these # 8 pistons fail... I bet if you really opened up the whole picture the cars were being Beat hard and the #8 piston oil squitter is comprimised and not cooling the piston.
Reply
Old May 11, 2011 | 07:16 PM
  #24  
blk5.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: August 4, 2010
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RedCandy5.0
From the lips of a Tuner.

The reason the cylinders let loose are not KS caused. Its Cheap Gas, not running the correct octane for the boost. Or simply the tunes were run slightly lean and used basic value files instead of actual dyno driven tunes.

The Knock Sensor senativity was not changed the ability to pull global knock or individual knock. Ford says #8 does get heard as well for Knock if it exist and to leave the KS in global knock status meaning 1 cylinder knocks, Spark gets pulled on all cylinders instead of spark being pulled at individual cylinders.

Solution...... Don't get knock. Run 93 from a Shell or Sunoco. Other solution. Race Track, Race Gas , Race Tune..... Run Octane while beating the car at the track.

I would have to send out over 500 tune updates. As I have had no one Blow up. I also don't run as much overall spark as some other shops and I run the cars Commanded Fuel Richer.

Also I suspect the cars that had these # 8 pistons fail... I bet if you really opened up the whole picture the cars were being Beat hard and the #8 piston oil squitter is comprimised and not cooling the piston.
was that off another site or a pm you sent to a tuner company? if it was another site can you post a link to it. thanks
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 10:53 AM
  #25  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
internet hype.
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 12:56 PM
  #26  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
How many people have come back with this issue on a supercharged engine?
As far as I've read these are all tune related (with mild mods)
All the reported issues come from the same piston locations.

These engines can obviously take the power...
How you make it, THAT is what I'd be concerned with.

Problem with new engines, some people have to play the guinea pigs to the tuners.
Attached Thumbnails tunes gone wrong-tuning.jpg  

Last edited by Boomer; May 13, 2011 at 03:38 PM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 02:09 PM
  #27  
05-1947's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 10, 2005
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota
Originally Posted by Five Oh Brian
Posted in another thread, it appears that the tuners out there are reverting back to OEM knock sensor settings to prevent this from happening again. So, tuners looked to have been too aggressive by not allowing the ECU to retard timing (enough) when detonation was being detected.
What does this have to do with my quote in your post? My comment about the hardware was in response to someone stating they will be going with Diablosport over SCT..... of which again the hardware (type of handheld) is not the problem.
Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 03:56 PM
  #28  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
this is a datalog of mine. both banks. and spark advance.





nothing in this tune will cause a failure.
Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 08:46 PM
  #29  
KonaBlue5.0's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 7, 2010
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Boomer
How many people have come back with this issue on a supercharged engine?
As far as I've read these are all tune related (with mild mods)
All the reported issues come from the same piston locations.

These engines can obviously take the power...
How you make it, THAT is what I'd be concerned with.

Problem with new engines, some people have to play the guinea pigs to the tuners.
Some people have determined that this is purely a ring failure, as detonation would have caused distortion of the piston as well, not just a simple crack in the ring - this seems to indicate it is not a tune error, but a manufacturer error.
Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 09:54 PM
  #30  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by KonaBlue5.0
Some people have determined that this is purely a ring failure, as detonation would have caused distortion of the piston as well, not just a simple crack in the ring - this seems to indicate it is not a tune error, but a manufacturer error.
I have to agree with this. It looks like a clean break without any other circumspect damage.
Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 10:11 PM
  #31  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by cdynaco
I have to agree with this. It looks like a clean break without any other circumspect damage.
I'll believe that when I see one fail on the stock tune
Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 10:11 PM
  #32  
fdjizm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 2
I'm sticking to casting problem, why #8 if it's a tune issue? look how clean that piston is and how nicely that chunk snapped off I just can't see this being a tune problem and those who claim it's a tune problem you would have to tell me why it's just #8? and why are there no signs of detonation.
Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 10:38 PM
  #33  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by fdjizm
I'm sticking to casting problem, why #8 if it's a tune issue? look how clean that piston is and how nicely that chunk snapped off I just can't see this being a tune problem and those who claim it's a tune problem you would have to tell me why it's just #8? and why are there no signs of detonation.
Good point.
Seems like that other thread mentioned more than one 5.0 having the #8 fail. That hole is subject to more heat, and it was thrown out there that maybe the #8 (piston cooling) oil squirter is starved under load - which would be surprising with the huge pan capacity and the baffles. But if true, with the higher compression, and a hotter piston than the others, perhaps that is beyond what the stock (plastic metal ) piston can take. I would think even moreso if you were pushing it on and off, on and off... and that particular casting was at its limit.

Last edited by cdynaco; May 16, 2011 at 12:34 PM.
Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 10:49 PM
  #34  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Originally Posted by KonaBlue5.0
Some people have determined that this is purely a ring failure, as detonation would have caused distortion of the piston as well, not just a simple crack in the ring - this seems to indicate it is not a tune error, but a manufacturer error.
While I can certainly agree that in one or more cases this could be entirely possible, not saying it is....

But
Those darn #8 rings...guess #1 through 7 were done right.
Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 10:53 PM
  #35  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by Boomer
...guess #1 through 7 were done right.

"Well boys - we hit our 87.5% minimum quota - looks like we get that bonus!! Good job!!!"




Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 11:12 PM
  #36  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
Come on guys the proof is already in front of you. If Ford had any idea it wasn't their fault they would never have replaced a single one of these motors. And we all know that. Right Boomer?


Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 08:11 AM
  #37  
MRGTX's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2010
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 15
From: CT
Some interesting (and some not so interesting) conversation going on about this at allfordmustangs.com.

It seems that some tuners have messed with the stock knock sensor paramaters...though most have claimed that their tunes don't involve this. This maaaayy be relevant though nobody knows (of course).

The problem that I see coming down the road is that with any tuned car, both Ford and the tuner have plausible deniability and the customer is left to grab their ankles and take it.

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...take-dump.html
Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 08:20 AM
  #38  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Originally Posted by MRGTX
Some interesting (and some not so interesting) conversation going on about this at allfordmustangs.com.

It seems that some tuners have messed with the stock knock sensor paramaters...though most have claimed that their tunes don't involve this. This maaaayy be relevant though nobody knows (of course).

The problem that I see coming down the road is that with any tuned car, both Ford and the tuner have plausible deniability and the customer is left to grab their ankles and take it.

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...take-dump.html
I wouldn't be surprised.
Just saying that it would be a bunch of things, and I'm not counting out an issue with parts....
but... if its the same position in every complaint, they've all had tunes, and there are cars putting out more power without this issue...

Kinda makes you wonder.
Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 08:33 AM
  #39  
fdjizm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 2
Makes you wonder why you could do this all day with 3v's? lol
Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 11:58 AM
  #40  
Scothew's Avatar
Stubborn Bear
TMS Staff
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 22,692
Likes: 48
This isnt the place to take this political which also includes union discussion. Keep it on subject and it will stay open.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 PM.