5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lower Control Arm discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 07:28 AM
  #1  
Overboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
Lower Control Arm discussion

Haven't seen any real mention of changing the LCAs to eliminate wheel hop. Anyone out there (besides Shaun) changed their LCAs, and if so, what did you use?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 11:31 AM
  #2  
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: February 18, 2010
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 1
From: S.E. Texas
I like the ones from J&M, he uses a unique bushing in the front of the arms. It is a 3 piece urethane bushing that has a center bushing that is round and fits into cupped bushings on either side, this allows it to act sort of like a spherical rod end so that some rotation can occur keeping it from binding up in the turns but still providing control under acceleration. And the price is right.

http://www.hotpart.com/shop/index.ph...duct_list&c=69
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 03:54 PM
  #3  
Big Poppa's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 25, 2005
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
From: Skopje, Macedonia
I had the Steeda billet LCA's on my previous Mustang and was very happy with them. I haven't put any on this car yet, but I'm going to need a set cause this thing hops like a bunny. I like the design of the J&M pieces, but I'll probably go with the Steeda pieces once again.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 10:13 PM
  #4  
908ssp's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 16, 2010
Posts: 864
Likes: 2
I have and like the J&M ones too. They work and don't put any more binding on the arms when cornering or hittin bumps the the stock ones.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 08:34 AM
  #5  
Liquid's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: October 4, 2010
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
How much of an increase in NVH with the J&M LCA's?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 07:10 PM
  #6  
908ssp's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 16, 2010
Posts: 864
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Liquid
How much of an increase in NVH with the J&M LCA's?

None that I would pin point to the J&M LCAs. I have a host of things changed urethane engine mounts, panhard rod, UCA, exhaust, shifter, 20" wheels all these things can add a bit of noise. The car is still very smooth and not loud at all just a bit more tight and mechanical feeling less rubbery.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 07:18 PM
  #7  
m4a1mustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 22, 2010
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 1
From: Northern VA
I replaced my stock LCAs with Steeda chrome-molys. Wheel hop is still pretty bad and there was quite a bit of an NVH increase. I hear everything from the rear end now.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #8  
Liquid's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: October 4, 2010
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
Originally Posted by m4a1mustang
I replaced my stock LCAs with Steeda chrome-molys. Wheel hop is still pretty bad and there was quite a bit of an NVH increase. I hear everything from the rear end now.
You might want to try relocation brackets. I had them on my previous S197, and coupled with the LCA's, that car hooked.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #9  
m4a1mustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 22, 2010
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 1
From: Northern VA
That's what I was thinking. They are on my "to do" list.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 12:53 PM
  #10  
Tucker's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 19, 2005
Posts: 674
Likes: 1
Lowers don't fix wheel hop, the upper does.
The 2011 has a longer upper control arm to try and help with wheel hop. To get rid of it, add a Metco heavy duty upper control arm mount and adjustable upper control arm.
Adding the lowers is a good thing to do and the relocation brackets will help you get more bite.
I 60' in the 1.63 range with this set up.

Thanks
Jay
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 01:03 PM
  #11  
Overboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Tucker
Lowers don't fix wheel hop, the upper does.
The 2011 has a longer upper control arm to try and help with wheel hop. To get rid of it, add a Metco heavy duty upper control arm mount and adjustable upper control arm.
Adding the lowers is a good thing to do and the relocation brackets will help you get more bite.
I 60' in the 1.63 range with this set up.

Thanks
Jay
Hmm. Wouldn't a beefier lower arm with a stiffer shocks and springs alleviate it as well?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #12  
m4a1mustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 22, 2010
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 1
From: Northern VA
That's what everyone says... LCAs will help reduce or eliminate the hop. Hell, that's what all the marketing materials say too. I suppose an adjustable upper is not a bad idea, but I will be very annoyed if I can't get rid of it.

Given my experience at the track last weekend it appears as if my LCAs did absolutely nothing.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 02:01 PM
  #13  
2010MustangGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 11, 2009
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 0
There was this thread out there- may serve to be informative...
https://themustangsource.com/f726/wh...around-486978/
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 05:22 PM
  #14  
Liquid's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: October 4, 2010
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
My setup also had lowering springs, but I can't really comment on how much of a difference those made.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 03:33 PM
  #15  
Overboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
I think I'm gonna go with the FR500C LCA's with poly bushings:

http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts...KeyField=10918

Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 03:42 PM
  #16  
sam strano's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 28, 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Brookville, PA
Don't do that... Can save you a butt load of $. Check these UMI's out: http://www.stranoparts.com/partdetai...D=99&ModelID=5

Notice that they are pretty much exactly the same (though you can get them in red or black, your choice) for $104.99... and they have zerks so you can grease them too.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 04:55 PM
  #17  
KonaBlue5.0's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 7, 2010
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Sam, you're going to put all other suspension-related businesses..out of business!

I can't wait to get some money put together to browse your site..hop off the line in 1st and 2nd is killing me!
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 04:59 PM
  #18  
m4a1mustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 22, 2010
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 1
From: Northern VA
I wish I had gone with those UMIs. They would have saved me a good bit of cash considering the Steeda LCAs didn't do what I was hoping they'd do. Haha.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 05:07 PM
  #19  
m4reapr's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 24, 2010
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: fredneck county, MD
do some of the LCA's transmit extra noise, like how do the UMI's fair in that category.

How about the upper mount and upper arm from Metco, more noise also?

Does more noise also come from being lowered and using an aftermarket lower and upper.

I know these are general questions and other mods may increase noise but say if the Metco upper and UMI lowers were installed on a stock suspension car would they make more noise?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 05:36 PM
  #20  
sam strano's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 28, 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Brookville, PA
All aftermarket control arms run the risk of more noise. Two reasons for this.

1. Stock arms are designed to keep NVH at a minimum, hence soft, compliant rubber bushings and stamped pieces

2. Aftermarket parts use some sort of tube which is stronger, but transmits harmonics more effectively. And they use bushings or rod-ends, or other types of "bushings" that aren't as soft or compliant.

I'm not out to put other folks out of business, and I doubt I can do that anyway (I'm just a small company, pretty much me and my family helping at times).

Take a tubular LCA with urethane bushings. One is pretty much going to make as much "noise" as another... this is why the stock PHB from Ford has the shot in it--to help kill NVH in a tubular part.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:48 AM.