5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

412 HP w/ 91 octane, what about 93?

Old Apr 22, 2010 | 11:28 PM
  #61  
Lancel's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2010
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
It's entirely possible the computer simply adjusts the timing table over the first few seconds of running, tweaking it slightly where it detects knocking until it finds the healthy middle. This could even partially explain that article last month about Mustangs putting down more rear wheel horsepower than they expected. Someone might have put 93 (or even higher) in the engine, while Ford's numbers are based on 91.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 11:45 AM
  #62  
06GT's Avatar
 
Joined: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 6
775 at the wheels
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 11:46 AM
  #63  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
I wish I could get 93 in San Diego. All we get is 10% ethanol 91. Sucks ***.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 12:56 PM
  #64  
montreal ponies's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Originally Posted by MARZ
Come on, man, it's a bunch of Mustang enthusiasts talking about the first real V8 to give the competition fits in a long time -- the first new one in, what, twelve years? What do you expect? Give us all a break...
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 01:12 PM
  #65  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
what about 5% nitro methane. that should add something.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cdvision
2010-2014 Mustang
6
Sep 5, 2015 05:22 PM
jim010
2010-2014 Mustang
4
Aug 13, 2015 02:32 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 PM.