5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2013 Mustang GT Stock VS Intake/Exhaust/Tune Acceleration Test!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 10:52 AM
  #1  
RCE EATR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 27, 2012
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: VA
Cool 2013 Mustang GT Stock VS Intake/Exhaust/Tune Acceleration Test!

Quick comparison I did of the acceleration of the car from 65-145mph when it was stock compared to how it is now 65-150mph. Basically it reaches 100mph 0.7-0.8 seconds faster, 120mph 1.6-1.7 seconds faster, and 140mph 3.1-3.2 seconds faster. Not too bad for just a Steeda Intake, JBA Off Road Xpipe, and Bama 92 octane performance tune

Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 02:03 PM
  #2  
AMDanBailer's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: July 5, 2011
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: Malvern, PA
Yeah, that's very impressive! I'm glad to hear you're enjoying your Bama tune. Thanks for posting!

-Dan
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 02:45 PM
  #3  
RCE EATR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 27, 2012
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by AMDanBailer
Yeah, that's very impressive! I'm glad to hear you're enjoying your Bama tune. Thanks for posting!

-Dan
Thanks! Yeah I'm loving it!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 05:14 PM
  #4  
Thamac15's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 1, 2012
Posts: 595
Likes: 3
From: Waddell, AZ
Not too shabby at all. I'm impressed.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 05:22 PM
  #5  
Ponywars's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 15, 2012
Posts: 500
Likes: 9
From: Orange County NY
Very cool!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 06:04 PM
  #6  
RCE EATR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 27, 2012
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: VA
Thanks!

Originally Posted by Thamac15
Not too shabby at all. I'm impressed.
Yeah definitely a big difference.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 06:54 PM
  #7  
BRADGTCS's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 13, 2013
Posts: 696
Likes: 2
From: Seattle Washington
I put on a cold air intake an SCT tune and a BKK 85MM throttle body I have upgrade the exhaust to Ford Racing X pipe and gt500 mufflers. It is amazing how much more responsive it is and how much more torque. So go out and get that throttle body. it is worth it. I will dyno it soon but it is estimated 420+whp torque unknown.
Attached Thumbnails 2013 Mustang GT Stock VS Intake/Exhaust/Tune Acceleration Test!-throttlebody-2.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 07:03 PM
  #8  
David Young's Avatar
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
 
Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 3,381
Likes: 125
From: Clinton Tennessee
Cool video....and people are still asking.......is a tune and a couple bolt ons worth the money?
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 08:13 PM
  #9  
frank s's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 23, 2008
Posts: 538
Likes: 5
From: San Diego
Could we know more about test conditions? Repeatability, ambient, personnel, equipment, experimental design?

Thank you.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 08:46 PM
  #10  
Pilks's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 24, 2008
Posts: 326
Likes: 2
From: Morris County, NJ
Originally Posted by frank s
Could we know more about test conditions? Repeatability, ambient, personnel, equipment, experimental design?

Thank you.
Truth
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2013 | 09:38 AM
  #11  
RCE EATR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 27, 2012
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by BRADGTCS
I put on a cold air intake an SCT tune and a BKK 85MM throttle body I have upgrade the exhaust to Ford Racing X pipe and gt500 mufflers. It is amazing how much more responsive it is and how much more torque. So go out and get that throttle body. it is worth it. I will dyno it soon but it is estimated 420+whp torque unknown.
Yeah I'm thinking about getting a throttle body. We'll see. I may do a before after dyno of the boss manifold and then with a new throttle body.

Originally Posted by David Young
Cool video....and people are still asking.......is a tune and a couple bolt ons worth the money?
Thanks! And yeah I see a lot of people thinking it's not worth it lol.

Originally Posted by frank s
Could we know more about test conditions? Repeatability, ambient, personnel, equipment, experimental design?

Thank you.
Yeah sure. Temps were about the same for both runs, around 50 degrees. Both runs were with 93 octane in the gas tank. Both runs were on a flat road. Rev limiter is a little higher on the tuned version allowing to take 5th to 150 when I shifted into 6th in the stock version at around 140mph. That's why I posted how much quicker it gets to 140. Stock is also limited to 147mph which is why you don't see it get quite to 150mph.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2013 | 01:06 PM
  #12  
Planeswalker's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2009
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 4
From: OKC, OK
Nice improvement. What was the total times to 140? Looked like roughly 11/12 seconds modded to 14/15 stock.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2013 | 09:38 PM
  #13  
frank s's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 23, 2008
Posts: 538
Likes: 5
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by RCE EATR



Yeah sure. Temps were about the same for both runs, around 50 degrees. Both runs were with 93 octane in the gas tank. Both runs were on a flat road. Rev limiter is a little higher on the tuned version allowing to take 5th to 150 when I shifted into 6th in the stock version at around 140mph. That's why I posted how much quicker it gets to 140. Stock is also limited to 147mph which is why you don't see it get quite to 150mph.
So that's one run with each set of conditions? How was the time measured?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2013 | 05:19 AM
  #14  
RCE EATR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 27, 2012
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by Planeswalker
Nice improvement. What was the total times to 140? Looked like roughly 11/12 seconds modded to 14/15 stock.
About 11.2 seconds with the mods vs about 14.4 stock.

Originally Posted by frank s
So that's one run with each set of conditions? How was the time measured?
Yeah. And a stopwatch comparing the mph in the video. Not super accurate but close enough.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2013 | 07:42 PM
  #15  
frank s's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 23, 2008
Posts: 538
Likes: 5
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by RCE EATR
Yeah. And a stopwatch comparing the mph in the video. Not super accurate but close enough.
Not really.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2013 | 06:25 AM
  #16  
RCE EATR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 27, 2012
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by frank s
Not really.
Lol what more do you want? I timed it with a stopwatch several times and it comes out about the same each time so it's pretty close. And the speedo was accurate both times. If 0.2 seconds difference is going to change whether you think it's worth it to mod your car or not worth it, then you're crazy.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2013 | 09:47 PM
  #17  
frank s's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 23, 2008
Posts: 538
Likes: 5
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by RCE EATR
Lol what more do you want? I timed it with a stopwatch several times and it comes out about the same each time so it's pretty close. And the speedo was accurate both times. If 0.2 seconds difference is going to change whether you think it's worth it to mod your car or not worth it, then you're crazy.
Nice to have that information. "...the speedo was accurate..." How was that determined?

I'm still skeptical WRT the reliability of any conclusions drawn from comparison between just two trials.

What track was this on?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 06:26 AM
  #18  
RCE EATR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 27, 2012
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by frank s
Nice to have that information. "...the speedo was accurate..." How was that determined?
GPS determined speedo was accurate. This wasn't a super scientific experiment. It was just to give people an idea lol.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 11:44 AM
  #19  
Saltyoldguy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: caledonia il
Originally Posted by frank s
Nice to have that information. "...the speedo was accurate..." How was that determined?

I'm still skeptical WRT the reliability of any conclusions drawn from comparison between just two trials.

What track was this on?
Skeptical about what? Cool vid.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 12:51 PM
  #20  
Bullitt 3309's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 11, 2012
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio Texas
Originally Posted by BRADGTCS
I put on a cold air intake an SCT tune and a BKK 85MM throttle body I have upgrade the exhaust to Ford Racing X pipe and gt500 mufflers. It is amazing how much more responsive it is and how much more torque. So go out and get that throttle body. it is worth it. I will dyno it soon but it is estimated 420+whp torque unknown.
Throttle body is a waste of money on a stock head/intake car. Already shown to have no gains on the dyno (Not advertisers dyno...). The modern 5.0 isvery well engineered compared to the original 5.0 and 4.6. If the factory TB wasn't up to snuff, why did Ford use it on the Boss, which spins higher and could use the airflow??? Until you get into FI or working the heads/intake the stack TB is plenty. Spend you money elsewhere.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 PM.