If I were in a position where I couldn't afford a 2011 GT with the options I want (premium package, optional wheels, glass roof, navigation) and I had to choose between a 2010 GT with all the goodies or a 2011 GT with no options, I'd rather have the 2010.

If my financial future then became brighter, it's not that hard to add a supercharger kit to bring the 2010 to 2011 power levels (or beyond). To try to retrofit the other things like Sync, factory navigation, glass roof to a 2011 would be impractical.

And for those not already "spoiled" by 300+ hp engines, they may find the 2010 GT more than satisfying anyway, so why not exploit the discounts/rebates/low interest and get a 2010? Put the money saved into taking a grand coast-to-coast road trip.

____________________________________


Lola Luna Accessories
cocktail dresses

 

Golly, this has been addressed in a FEW other threads that are currently active.

 

It's a matter of personal taste for some and a matter of better base for others. The same option can be said for buying a 2000 Civic. "I could do a motor swap turbo etc etc etc". Each has their own preference. Me, I'd rather wait a year and buy a 2011 5.0 used and have the best of both worlds.

 

So true, but give the guy a break, he's new here.

 

It is a bad start, though, to actually copy and paste someone else's comments from another thread and pass them off as your own. It's one thing to quote another member, it's another to plagiarize.

 

I think the OP is a spammer anyway, see the links in the sig?

 

Big time spammer.

 

spammer..............

 

I clicked on the first link he had and see this womens *** in my face lmfao.

 

Banned........ and threads closed.