Notices
4.6L GT Modifications Place to discuss the 4.6L 2010 motor based modifcations.

2010 supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3/3/13, 12:07 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
mastapink's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 2, 2013
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 supercharger

I'm thinking about possibly trading in my 2010 for a 13 or supercharging it in a couple months. i was thinking about getting the Roush m90 supercharger put on. Is that a good supercharger that will still be reliable
Old 3/3/13, 12:20 AM
  #2  
A Man Just Needs Some....
 
AlsCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 9, 2011
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 16,852
Received 34 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by mastapink
I'm thinking about possibly trading in my 2010 for a 13 or supercharging it in a couple months. i was thinking about getting the Roush m90 supercharger put on. Is that a good supercharger that will still be reliable
Yup. Good blower. Full kit from Roush is very reliable. Makes some pretty good power too.
Old 3/3/13, 11:28 AM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
mastapink's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 2, 2013
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it worth getting over the new 5.0 engine
Old 3/3/13, 11:36 AM
  #4  
Bullitt Member
 
TheMuffinMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 15, 2013
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You could get the supercharger made by ford and make 550hp!
Old 3/4/13, 11:02 AM
  #5  
V6 Member
 
10MustangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 27, 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wouldn't push that much through a stock 4.6..
Old 3/4/13, 11:41 AM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
mastapink's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 2, 2013
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's the most you could get without risking ruining the engine
Old 3/4/13, 12:41 PM
  #7  
Post *****
 
2k7gtcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,753
Received 159 Likes on 133 Posts
Originally Posted by mastapink
What's the most you could get without risking ruining the engine
The best rule of thumb I have heard is 500rwhp as a maximum. With a proper dyno tune from a good tuner. Some have had more and been fine.

My tuner got 505 with my Saleen SC and he and I agreed to dial it back a bit and I have been running 479rwhp without problems for about 3.5 years and 12,000 miles.

480 is no guarantee to be 100% safe though. But chances are if done correctly it will be ok.
Old 3/4/13, 01:23 PM
  #8  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
The best rule of thumb I have heard is 500rwhp as a maximum. With a proper dyno tune from a good tuner. Some have had more and been fine.

My tuner got 505 with my Saleen SC and he and I agreed to dial it back a bit and I have been running 479rwhp without problems for about 3.5 years and 12,000 miles.

480 is no guarantee to be 100% safe though. But chances are if done correctly it will be ok.
Just caught that was quoted as rwhp. I've always thought that the general 'safe' limit was 500 at the crank.
Old 3/4/13, 05:24 PM
  #9  
Post *****
 
2k7gtcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,753
Received 159 Likes on 133 Posts
Originally Posted by cdynaco

Just caught that was quoted as rwhp. I've always thought that the general 'safe' limit was 500 at the crank.
I've always understood it to be RWHP since we can measure that on a chassis dyno.

Now obviously those differ and there's some margin of error but if you try to extrapolate to the crank hp you are adding more possibility of error.

Nobody's pulling a engine and putting it on a dyno.

Anyway. The guys that came before me meant RWHP. Some pushed over that. I think the safest number is 450. Never heard of anyone having problems at 450.

But that's not enough hp for the trouble to me.
Old 3/4/13, 07:14 PM
  #10  
Mach 1 Member
 
908ssp's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 16, 2010
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
M90 is not big enough for the 4.6l motor don't waste your money.

The M122 from the GT500 is ideal and cheaper. Makes more hp with less heat.

Blown 4.6l
Old 3/4/13, 07:38 PM
  #11  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
I've always understood it to be RWHP since we can measure that on a chassis dyno.

Nobody's pulling a engine and putting it on a dyno.
Gotcha.
Old 3/5/13, 10:58 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
mastapink's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 2, 2013
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would it not be a good idea to supercharge since this is my DD car and I drive It all year or would it be fine
Old 3/6/13, 08:29 AM
  #13  
Post *****
 
2k7gtcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,753
Received 159 Likes on 133 Posts
Originally Posted by mastapink
Would it not be a good idea to supercharge since this is my DD car and I drive It all year or would it be fine
People buy supercharged Shelbys and daily drive them. If anything it will make it more fun to drive.

But the install and the tune are critical to the longevity of the car. Now you will have to use premium fuel with the SC. I would consider that also.
Old 3/6/13, 08:36 AM
  #14  
Post *****
 
2k7gtcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,753
Received 159 Likes on 133 Posts
Also with an SC you have to disable traction control each time you drive it. It protects the motor from having fuel starved to it should traction control kick in.

So plan on having no traction control either which would suck if you daily drive in the winter in a cold climate.
Old 3/6/13, 07:15 PM
  #15  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Bert's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 25, 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,760
Received 1,498 Likes on 1,022 Posts
Originally Posted by 908ssp
M90 is not big enough for the 4.6l motor don't waste your money.

The M122 from the GT500 is ideal and cheaper. Makes more hp with less heat.

Blown 4.6l
or the Roush TVS 2300 . . . more money than the M90 or the GT500 take-off + DBA manifold and parts, but a nice complete kit
Old 3/6/13, 09:41 PM
  #16  
Mach 1 Member
 
908ssp's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 16, 2010
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
Also with an SC you have to disable traction control each time you drive it. It protects the motor from having fuel starved to it should traction control kick in.

So plan on having no traction control either which would suck if you daily drive in the winter in a cold climate.

Not true. The throttle closes so air fuel ratio stays safe. Traction Control is mostly brakes in any case.
Old 3/6/13, 09:54 PM
  #17  
Post *****
 
2k7gtcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,753
Received 159 Likes on 133 Posts
Originally Posted by 908ssp

Not true. The throttle closes so air fuel ratio stays safe. Traction Control is mostly brakes in any case.
I stand corrected
Old 7/9/13, 03:34 PM
  #18  
Mach 1 Member
 
Krohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
As someone with a 5.0L....
That's a tough choice!

On one hand,
4.6L - Strong and known through and through.
Supercharged - Enough said. lol Gotta love that whine and how cool it looks!
On the side it could read GT and underneath "Supercharged"

And the other hand,
5.0L - Famous new engine (though less knowledge due to age)
N/A - Being stock means being safe and still having 420hp+ on tap. Again, thats stock! (on premium)
On the side it DOES read 5.0

Hard decision... :/ Good luck though!
Old 7/21/13, 11:22 PM
  #19  
Member
 
MustangBlackout's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 6, 2010
Location: PEI
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you go with 5.0L you need to worry about the transmission problems that come hand in hand with the standard tranny.
Old 7/27/13, 09:54 AM
  #20  
Bullitt Member
 
V6 Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 22, 2012
Location: West Bend, Wisconsin
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Krohn
As someone with a 5.0L....
That's a tough choice!

N/A - Being stock means being safe and still having 420hp+ on tap. Again, thats stock! (on premium)

Hard decision... :/ Good luck though!
Isn't that 420hp at the crank, so after drivetrain loss you are in the 357rwhp range?

Last edited by V6 Driver; 7/27/13 at 10:00 AM.


Quick Reply: 2010 supercharger



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:05 PM.