Did anyone else read the Car and Driver review of the 2014 RS3 in the Nov 2013 Issue?
Not very good news for the Roush RS3 set up, it's almost as if they, CAR and Driver, thought it was a waste of money. Maybe it is, at least HP and speed related.
I drove a RS3 before I bought my GT, it rode like a horse cart and quite honestly, I did not even realize it had a modified engine, needless to say I passed.
I drove a RS3 before I bought my GT, it rode like a horse cart and quite honestly, I did not even realize it had a modified engine, needless to say I passed.
Take a look at a previous C&D article on a 2010 Roush Stage 3 and they ran 12.4 in the quarter-mile and loved the car...now with 35 more horses they run a 12.9 and don't like the car...it's all a matter of opinion and how good of a driver is behind the wheel. Traction is definitely a problem with the stock tires...put on some slicks and you will really lower the times.
And there is a definite difference between a stock GT and a 5.0 with a blower...you must have done an 'easy' test drive
And there is a definite difference between a stock GT and a 5.0 with a blower...you must have done an 'easy' test drive
Last edited by EastTNMustang; Oct 23, 2013 at 02:39 PM.
I love my Roush Stage 3. I was after the '14 Shelby, but that would have hit the wallet hard.
Not very good news for the Roush RS3 set up, it's almost as if they, CAR and Driver, thought it was a waste of money. Maybe it is, at least HP and speed related.
I drove a RS3 before I bought my GT, it rode like a horse cart and quite honestly, I did not even realize it had a modified engine, needless to say I passed.
I drove a RS3 before I bought my GT, it rode like a horse cart and quite honestly, I did not even realize it had a modified engine, needless to say I passed.
I'm not saying that the RS3 is super fast, but it isn't slow, that's for sure.
The rs3 on top gear America didn't fare well against the boss 302 either. My perception is an rs3 more of a quarter mile monster. I don't think of it as a track car. I think a gt set up right might be a better choice for that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustang259
Not very good news for the Roush RS3 set up, it's almost as if they, CAR and Driver, thought it was a waste of money. Maybe it is, at least HP and speed related.
I drove a RS3 before I bought my GT, it rode like a horse cart and quite honestly, I did not even realize it had a modified engine, needless to say I passed.
-------------------------
You must have one really fast and nimble Mustang to notice that that RS3 drove like a horse cart and didn't have enough power for you.
I'm not saying that the RS3 is super fast, but it isn't slow, that's for sure.
----------------------------
Hey it is just my opinion, the price of the RS3 vs a GT was not justified by the RS3 ride and performance, and that is the jist of the article by Car and Driver, although they seemed to like the handling of the RS3. Maybe the test drive I took was in a poorly built RS3, who knows, but I sure would not buy the one I drove.
Originally Posted by Mustang259
Not very good news for the Roush RS3 set up, it's almost as if they, CAR and Driver, thought it was a waste of money. Maybe it is, at least HP and speed related.
I drove a RS3 before I bought my GT, it rode like a horse cart and quite honestly, I did not even realize it had a modified engine, needless to say I passed.
-------------------------
You must have one really fast and nimble Mustang to notice that that RS3 drove like a horse cart and didn't have enough power for you.
I'm not saying that the RS3 is super fast, but it isn't slow, that's for sure.
----------------------------
Hey it is just my opinion, the price of the RS3 vs a GT was not justified by the RS3 ride and performance, and that is the jist of the article by Car and Driver, although they seemed to like the handling of the RS3. Maybe the test drive I took was in a poorly built RS3, who knows, but I sure would not buy the one I drove.
Last edited by Mustang259; Oct 23, 2013 at 08:10 PM.
I suppose the problem is that the factory Mustangs are getting THAT good. Compared to a stock 2001, the Stage 3 was a much better handler and performer but the difference now seems negligible for a much higher price tag. The new ones look fantastic but, combined with their resale value, and, given reviews like this, there seems to be little reason to buy one unless you can get it for a steal.
My wife ran a 12.0 her FIRST time ever at the track in her 2013 Stage 3, to bad there wasn't a girl standing around to show them what the car was actually capable of LOL! She was on stock tires and tune at the time during the hot summer. If you think a stage 3 is slow and handles poorly, I can have my wife show you how to drive.
Like Father...
I ♥ Sausage
I ♥ Sausage





Joined: April 4, 2007
Posts: 20,164
Likes: 643
From: Just outside the middle of nowhere
^^ Pics of the wife?
My wife ran a 12.0 her FIRST time ever at the track in her 2013 Stage 3, to bad there wasn't a girl standing around to show them what the car was actually capable of LOL! She was on stock tires and tune at the time during the hot summer. If you think a stage 3 is slow and handles poorly, I can have my wife show you how to drive.
Roush does a lot of things to just make the car fun to drive. For example, Jack has the guys give the shifter a feel that he likes. You get a good performing car that is durable as a factory Mustang. I have a Roush car on my bucket list.
I suppose the problem is that the factory Mustangs are getting THAT good. Compared to a stock 2001, the Stage 3 was a much better handler and performer but the difference now seems negligible for a much higher price tag. The new ones look fantastic but, combined with their resale value, and, given reviews like this, there seems to be little reason to buy one unless you can get it for a steal.
Last edited by typesredline; Feb 5, 2014 at 07:23 AM.


