Dyno Run after 2.6 Pulley and WMS Tune
#1
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno Run after 2.6 Pulley and WMS Tune
In my previous dyno post JJ at Woodbine Motorsports ran some baseline numbers on my car.
First run with the stock Ford tune
460RWHP/415RWTRQ
77.61F
24% Humidity
Second run with the Evo "Lund" Tune
473RWHP/449RWTQ
80.21F
26% Humidity
*far from the 510RWHP/480RWHP Evo advertises on their 2010 GT500 -
JJ installed a stock lock VMP 2.65 pulley, Metco Idler, Afco Dual Fan Heat Exchanger, and VMP stock look coolant tank. Unfortunately the VMP pulley wasn't balanced right and would wobble. I had to get a Metco 2.6 overnighted from Lethal Performance. (Big Props to them for the quick turn around) JJ street tuned the car today. I took it over to Adrenaline Automotive to get some dyno numbers since JJ doesn't have one yet. It was a 30 minute drive to the shop and the car sat for 20 minutes before the first pulls and only 10 minutes for the third pull. (Which was the best) Below is a video of the best run.
513RWP/500RWTRQ
70.65F
6% Humidity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTxWH8axmFA
First run with the stock Ford tune
460RWHP/415RWTRQ
77.61F
24% Humidity
Second run with the Evo "Lund" Tune
473RWHP/449RWTQ
80.21F
26% Humidity
*far from the 510RWHP/480RWHP Evo advertises on their 2010 GT500 -
JJ installed a stock lock VMP 2.65 pulley, Metco Idler, Afco Dual Fan Heat Exchanger, and VMP stock look coolant tank. Unfortunately the VMP pulley wasn't balanced right and would wobble. I had to get a Metco 2.6 overnighted from Lethal Performance. (Big Props to them for the quick turn around) JJ street tuned the car today. I took it over to Adrenaline Automotive to get some dyno numbers since JJ doesn't have one yet. It was a 30 minute drive to the shop and the car sat for 20 minutes before the first pulls and only 10 minutes for the third pull. (Which was the best) Below is a video of the best run.
513RWP/500RWTRQ
70.65F
6% Humidity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTxWH8axmFA
Last edited by bpmurr; 4/9/10 at 10:12 PM.
#4
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#7
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: November 3, 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#11
Post *****
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Case in point, Ford did nothing to the 08/09 Bullitt internals yet they bumped it to 6500.
#12
No, you don't automatically go boom of course. RPM is the killer of this motor though on stock rods. I'd rather just add more boost and keep it at 6250.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
9/8/15 10:45 AM