30th Vintage Mustang Owner Association show! 2 IIs!!!
Thread Starter
Post *****
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
30th Vintage Mustang Owner Association show! 2 IIs!!!
Well, theres a story to go with these pictures, but you'll have to go to the thread about my II to learn about it lol. anyhow, heres some pichas. I tried to keep myself from taking 300 shots this time around, and focused on cars that really stood out to me
I know Doug will like the beginning lol
more to come....
I know Doug will like the beginning lol
more to come....
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, California
I was there. 
That Fiesta is Awsome! My friend's dad has one and it is hilarious!
Awesome pics Arin!! 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, California
Arin you are on crack.
The coolest cars could have been
A) GT40. An original one.
B) 1965 GT350.
C) 1969 Mach 1 (it was a 351, but still had the shaker.. didn't know that was possible)
D) One of the copious Boss 302's
E) One of the GT350S's
F) anything else at the show other than that ****ed back section.
The coolest cars could have been
A) GT40. An original one.
B) 1965 GT350.
C) 1969 Mach 1 (it was a 351, but still had the shaker.. didn't know that was possible)
D) One of the copious Boss 302's
E) One of the GT350S's
F) anything else at the show other than that ****ed back section.
Thread Starter
Post *****
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Peter
A) that car was cool but not Fiesta cool
B) stfu
C) '69 AND '70 Mach 1s could have shakers. The only model where shaker was limited to '70 was the Boss 302.
D) Ok that white one was pretty sweet. Dog dishes
E) That Green GT350S was cool, as was the blue one my mechanic owns. but not my favorites
F)The other two cars I'd call my favorites were the '71/'72 Mach 1 or the Bullitt
Anyhow, that show was a blast. Y'all should come next time
A) that car was cool but not Fiesta cool
B) stfu
C) '69 AND '70 Mach 1s could have shakers. The only model where shaker was limited to '70 was the Boss 302.
D) Ok that white one was pretty sweet. Dog dishes
E) That Green GT350S was cool, as was the blue one my mechanic owns. but not my favorites
F)The other two cars I'd call my favorites were the '71/'72 Mach 1 or the Bullitt
Anyhow, that show was a blast. Y'all should come next time
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, California
I still say you are on something... prolly stronger than crack come to think of it.
You need help whatever it is. Post the pictures of the '65 GT350!
You need help whatever it is. Post the pictures of the '65 GT350!
Thread Starter
Post *****
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Congrats on your plaque I have to say a Grande CJ has to be one of the coolest sleepers ever. Love the color combo too, was looking at one like yours, albeit with a 351, way bacjk when
I have to say a Grande CJ has to be one of the coolest sleepers ever. Love the color combo too, was looking at one like yours, albeit with a 351, way bacjk when
Thread Starter
Post *****
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
I don't think the lady who took all the professional shots will mind this publicity:
http://ground-speed.com/2007/vmoa_sh...moa_ncsaac.htm
Thats the album of hers with all the shots from the show. If you go and hover your mouse over the "registration" box, you'll see a familiar II with its derrier in the air.
To see more pics of my entrance, go through the registration link, then to the "9:00" section, and go to pages 5 and 6.
or just click here, and move on to page 6 after
http://ground-speed.com/2007/vmoa_sh...00/index_5.htm
http://ground-speed.com/2007/vmoa_sh...moa_ncsaac.htm
Thats the album of hers with all the shots from the show. If you go and hover your mouse over the "registration" box, you'll see a familiar II with its derrier in the air.
To see more pics of my entrance, go through the registration link, then to the "9:00" section, and go to pages 5 and 6.
or just click here, and move on to page 6 after
http://ground-speed.com/2007/vmoa_sh...00/index_5.htm
GTR Member
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 5,720
Likes: 9
Great pictures Arin, I could spent all day just going over them
again and again.
Now what's with all the tilted views, was there a series of mini-earthquakes while you were taking pictures?
Or, was a strong wind catchin' the fro, causing you to tilt the camera?
again and again.
Now what's with all the tilted views, was there a series of mini-earthquakes while you were taking pictures?
Or, was a strong wind catchin' the fro, causing you to tilt the camera?
Thread Starter
Post *****
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
You're the second person to ever ask that question, and the first person to ask it remotely seriously 
The reason I tend to do that alot is it allows me to fill mroe of the picture with car. I like to do it when I really want to get everything in one shot. Sometimes it works better than others, as I'm sure you noticed lol. IT kinda depends on the car's size too.
This shot, for example, didn't need an angle to make it take up most of the picture; the car is long enough, and the open hood takes up a great deal of space too. It ends up filling the rectangle quite well
This car however was very flat and low to the ground. If I took just a straight shot from where I was standing, it would only fill around half of the final image. I could have just crouched like I did with the green Pantera, but then I dont get to see the hood. I could have done this one better (I noticed some clipping) but the effect sorta works. The angle of camera tilt, combined with my looking down at an angle from altitude really make the car into most of the image.
Now you can either buy all that garbage I just typed out, or assume im just a crazy boy with a decent camera who thinks he's some sort of "pro"
The reason I tend to do that alot is it allows me to fill mroe of the picture with car. I like to do it when I really want to get everything in one shot. Sometimes it works better than others, as I'm sure you noticed lol. IT kinda depends on the car's size too.
This shot, for example, didn't need an angle to make it take up most of the picture; the car is long enough, and the open hood takes up a great deal of space too. It ends up filling the rectangle quite well
This car however was very flat and low to the ground. If I took just a straight shot from where I was standing, it would only fill around half of the final image. I could have just crouched like I did with the green Pantera, but then I dont get to see the hood. I could have done this one better (I noticed some clipping) but the effect sorta works. The angle of camera tilt, combined with my looking down at an angle from altitude really make the car into most of the image.
Now you can either buy all that garbage I just typed out, or assume im just a crazy boy with a decent camera who thinks he's some sort of "pro"
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, California
