Rocket City Mustang Club Huntsville, Alabama Chapter of The Mustang Club of America

100% newb question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 06:29 PM
  #1  
1966L6's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2007
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
100% newb question

Anyone out there built a 300hp 289.
I would like to have 300 hp to the rear wheels. How hard is that with iron heads?What compresion,cam and heads should i use? Please excuse my ignorance on Ford engines.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #2  
workmangc's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 18, 2007
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
NA or FI??
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 09:10 PM
  #3  
1966L6's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2007
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
NA,Carb
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 05:04 AM
  #4  
HOSS429's Avatar
legacy Tms Member
 
Joined: January 27, 2007
Posts: 4,617
Likes: 175
From: alerbamer
i`m sure i have old hot rod or car craft issues with buildups of just about any h/p stage one could want .. i will search them and find an issue or two for you to hunt up .. i personally would build a mild 250 horse or so motor then add a 75 horse nitrous kit ..
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 06:37 AM
  #5  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 1966L6
Anyone out there built a 300hp 289.
I would like to have 300 hp to the rear wheels. How hard is that with iron heads?What compresion,cam and heads should i use? Please excuse my ignorance on Ford engines.
These days, it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to stay with 289 cubes, when you can stroke up to 347+ cubic inches in the same block. You should have no problem with your HP goals with a stroked small block along with the right cam and a little head work.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #6  
1966L6's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2007
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
I know staying with the 289 makes no sense and would be easier to hit my goal with more cubes but i like the 289 better.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 08:40 AM
  #7  
LMan's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2004
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0


they are indistinguishable from the outside. you can keep the 289 badges on your fenders and no ones the wiser....till you stomp on it.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 09:02 AM
  #8  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 1966L6
I know staying with the 289 makes no sense and would be easier to hit my goal with more cubes but i like the 289 better.
What do you like? The sound? As LMan, said, it would be undetectable from a visual standpoint. If you have to rebuild anyways, it's nearly free horsepower.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 01:27 PM
  #9  
kkucera's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 15, 2006
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
And, you could get the benefits of stepping up to a roller-cam block.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 01:31 PM
  #10  
LMan's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2004
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Matt, what you need to do is to buy some of these old Ford hands a beer or three and let 'em walk you through all the options!
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 06:47 PM
  #11  
workmangc's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 18, 2007
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
I would go with a stroker kit, You get the added torque from the stroke. However I have heard bad things about the 347's in their stroke/rod ratio, and that the 331 is a better choice.

You would want to verify that though.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 08:16 PM
  #12  
1966L6's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2007
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by LMan


they are indistinguishable from the outside. you can keep the 289 badges on your fenders and no ones the wiser....till you stomp on it.
Thats true.
What is a 347 stroker?
351 with a 302 crank?
Teach me.
Please
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007 | 05:45 AM
  #13  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 1966L6
Thats true.
What is a 347 stroker?
351 with a 302 crank?
Teach me.
Please
302 (289) with stroker crank. Early 347 strokers had oil comsumption problems as the early piston designs had the oil control ring crossing the pin area. Newer ones have redesigned pistons that do away with this desgin problem. A 331 would also be a better choice than a stock 289 if you're rebuilding anyway. There are also roller cam conversions for old non-roller blocks as well.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007 | 08:04 AM
  #14  
HOSS429's Avatar
legacy Tms Member
 
Joined: January 27, 2007
Posts: 4,617
Likes: 175
From: alerbamer
no one has asked yet " how much you got to spend ? " .. if you up the cubes then you will need aftermarket heads to get the full benifit of more cubes .. size is power but it is also BIG BUCKS .. 1000 bucks freshen up your 289 ... 4000 $ and up to go bigger ..
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007 | 11:02 AM
  #15  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
True, but $1000 into a 289 is not going to get you 300 rearwheel hp like he wants.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007 | 01:43 PM
  #16  
LMan's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2004
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
this car an auto?

auto car 300rwhp = 350fwhp
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007 | 02:55 PM
  #17  
mmr007's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: November 7, 2006
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
if you are talking about Forza 2 on XBOX 360 then I suggest you just save up some more credits and get a complete engine upgrade or find someone on xbox live that will sell you one....if you are talking about real life cars then I don't know how to help you
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007 | 05:04 PM
  #18  
1966L6's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2007
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
My budget is around 2500-2800 but im doing a little at a time this is not an overnight project its going to take a while because the car has to be taken all the way down.
Yes this is an automatic car but was a 3spd.
Im going to put a 4spd trans in it.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 08:08 AM
  #19  
HOSS429's Avatar
legacy Tms Member
 
Joined: January 27, 2007
Posts: 4,617
Likes: 175
From: alerbamer
make friends with some drag racers then and get some of their old stuff as they update .. good ported older iron heads and such .. and the 4 speed will make a less powerful motor seem "funner" than a slush box ..
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #20  
1966L6's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2007
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Thanks guys for the insight.Forgive my ignorance.Im really having to dig these days to catch up.I know a good bit about ole Chevy's but figured it was time for a change so i bought the ole 'stang and im luvin it!!Can anyone suggest some good books on how to build a performance smallblock Ford?
Thanks Matt
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:40 PM.