2008-2009 BULLITT The Bullitt is Back!

A FEW More Bullitt Details (Dec. 7th, 2006)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 05:55 PM
  #1  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
A FEW More Bullitt Details (Dec. 7th, 2006)

Found this article over at the Mississippi Clarion Ledger, dated from yesterday. Here is the quote of interest >>

Speaking in Jackson on Wednesday, Ford Motor Co. Vehicle Program Director Jeff Wood said a different Mustang package will be unveiled each year until 2010.

A Bullitt edition Mustang likely would combine a 310-plus horsepower V8 with a lowered suspension, special interior and gauge design and an exclusive wheel design. Bullitt refers to the 1968 film Bullitt in which Steve McQueen drove a dark green Mustang fastback.

Ford sold a Bullitt version of the previous-generation Mustang in 2001. It shed the plastic wing and ground effects add-ons common to special-edition Mustangs in favor of signature dark green paint, retro-style gauges and seats as well as a polished steel fuel door.
So much for the naysayers who still believe a Bullitt is not coming. Dunno about his '07 remarks though - perhaps he's thinking in production terms, as in the car begins production in December '07.

And from a 'connected' poster over at StangsUnleashed >>

2008.5 Bullitt production begins in December 2007. It will use the 4.6L 3V SOHC V8. It is currently rated at 300hp in 2005-7 Mustang GT or 2007 GT/CS trim, 319hp in Shelby GT trim, and 310hp in 2008.5 Bullitt trim. I agree with you that it would appear that the Bullitt will likely be a T82 (body code for 2005-7 Mustang GT, GT/CS, and Shelby GT coupes), so my money is on the Bullitt being an option on the GT model. The 2007 GT/CS is a one-year-only program, so the 2008.5 Bullitt will just be next year's special edition Mustang.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 06:31 PM
  #2  
1 COBRA's Avatar
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
...So much for the naysayers...
So, was I wrong? If I wanted to rub it in I would tell you "I TOLD YOU SO", but I won't, because I am a nice guy.

They are cooked up in their little world and want it to remain as it is, hoping it will not change. What has puzzled me has been the contradiction of holding the '68 on a pedestal while idolizing the '01 which was better in every sense but the design, yet not wanting combination of the two on the new platform. The best of both worlds.

It's the Bizarro World I tell you! Wee're gonna haff too set things aright parnner!


Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 06:33 PM
  #3  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
310hp does not do the bullitt justice.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 06:45 PM
  #4  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Knight
310hp does not do the bullitt justice.
They want to keep the 08 Bullitt in the same spirit as the 01 Bullitt.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 06:46 PM
  #5  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by Knight
310hp does not do the bullitt justice.
I agree. But remember, a 310 HP Bullitt ACTUALLY means a 350 HP Bullitt.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 07:57 PM
  #6  
bar's Avatar
bar
GT Member
 
Joined: March 10, 2004
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Just MSRP that thing at $32-33K (or less) and I'm in like Flynn.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 08:07 PM
  #7  
AFBLUE's Avatar
Dethroned Nascar Guru
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 2
Well it will have double the increase of horse power over the 08 GT, than the 01 Bullitt had over the 01 GT (10hp more vs 5hp more). Plus it would've smoked the original Bullitt.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 08:45 PM
  #8  
rmays06's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 5, 2006
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
I'm very happy with this news I only hopes it comes true!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 10:27 AM
  #9  
black_bullitt's Avatar
 
Joined: November 30, 2006
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 1
From: Spain
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
I agree. But remember, a 310 HP Bullitt ACTUALLY means a 350 HP Bullitt.
Is there something I'm missing here? As far as I'm concerned, Ford is notorious for overrating the output on their cars, specifically the Mustang.

* The '01 Bullitts were rated at 265, and when put on a dyno, only put down in the high 230's to low 240's. My Bullitt, with SLP LM II catback system and SLP o/r x-pipe only put down 245 on a dynojet (however i was in the mid 270's with tq).

* The Terminators were rated at 390. I was with a girl the day i dynoed the Bullitt, and her stock Cobra put down 360.

* And from what I've heard about the S197's; rated at 300, putting down somewhere in the 260's.

So with the standard Bullitt gains, You'd probably be more realistically looking at a 310hp Bullitt putting down around the 270's, on a good day.

At least that's from everything I've seen/heard. If i'm wrong, please feel free to shed some light on this for me, because i'm sure i don't know as much as i think i do, lol. if all goes well, i will be getting the new Bullitt anyways, so i would be curious to learn what the real story is going to be.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 10:33 AM
  #10  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by black_bullitt
Is there something I'm missing here? As far as I'm concerned, Ford is notorious for overrating the output on their cars, specifically the Mustang.

* The '01 Bullitts were rated at 265, and when put on a dyno, only put down in the high 230's to low 240's. My Bullitt, with SLP LM II catback system and SLP o/r x-pipe only put down 245 on a dynojet (however i was in the mid 270's with tq).

* The Terminators were rated at 390. I was with a girl the day i dynoed the Bullitt, and her stock Cobra put down 360.

* And from what I've heard about the S197's; rated at 300, putting down somewhere in the 260's.

So with the standard Bullitt gains, You'd probably be more realistically looking at a 310hp Bullitt putting down around the 270's, on a good day.

At least that's from everything I've seen/heard. If i'm wrong, please feel free to shed some light on this for me, because i'm sure i don't know as much as i think i do, lol. if all goes well, i will be getting the new Bullitt anyways, so i would be curious to learn what the real story is going to be.
Are you referring to rear wheel HP? If so, it's always less than the manufacturer rated HP due to drivetrain loss (generally 15% for a manual tranny). Manufacturers state crank HP not RWHP. That being the case, an '01 Bullitt putting down 240RWHP equates to about 282 crank HP, well above the factory-rated 265.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 10:45 AM
  #11  
black_bullitt's Avatar
 
Joined: November 30, 2006
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 1
From: Spain
Originally Posted by TomServo92
Are you referring to rear wheel HP? If so, it's always less than the manufacturer rated HP due to drivetrain loss (generally 15% for a manual tranny). Manufacturers state crank HP not RWHP. That being the case, an '01 Bullitt putting down 240RWHP equates to about 282 crank HP, well above the factory-rated 265.
lol, yep, that's what i had going on in my mind... i feel like an idiot!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 11:14 AM
  #12  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by black_bullitt
lol, yep, that's what i had going on in my mind... i feel like an idiot!
It's an easy mistake to make!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 02:11 PM
  #13  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by black_bullitt
lol, yep, that's what i had going on in my mind... i feel like an idiot!
Don't worry about it; it's a common mistake.

As Tom said, it all depends upon which number you're looking at: crank or RWHP.

I'll tell you how I arrived at that number (using crank as the benchmark) >>

Assuming the Bullitt gets 310 HP, Ford's V8 engines are usually underrated about 5 to 8% - which puts the rating for the '08 Bullitt at about 325 HP. And assuming we are able to do the same CAI and pro tune to the Bullitt that many are easily doing to the GT - which nets roughly another 20-25HP - then it's quite possible to see about 350 HP from the new Bullitt.

Clearly, if the Bullitt gets 310 HP, they're not doing it using the FRPP CAI and tune, or they'd be getting that 20-25 HP themselves. So Ford must be baking the power in at a more fundamental level, which means in addition to the 310 HP, the car might, just might, get more top end...or some other such intrinsic performance gain beyond just the horsepower number.

Anyone else want to chime in with thoughts on this?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #14  
JETSOLVER's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 30, 2004
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
New computer map. You don't think Ford hasn't noticed the fact that everyone is finding lots of free horses in that Spanish/Silver Oak do you? There have been rumours since August about new maps for the Silver Oak in the GT500 and I'll wager that the hard parts are the same. Typical Ford to leave something in the tank and pull it out in a M/Y or two. Heck they are going to start pushing their own(FRPP) flash tune's in the new year.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 06:48 PM
  #15  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by JETSOLVER
Heck they are going to start pushing their own(FRPP) flash tune's in the new year.
Really? To what? What Diablosport and others are already doing...?

Reply
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 08:23 PM
  #16  
JETSOLVER's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 30, 2004
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
For many its FRPP or nothing. I don't personally think that there is any harm in Ford offering a factory style(big testing) tune from the people that built and engineered the engine in the first place. Not to mention the large number of Shelbynistas that will just HAVE TO HAVE the FRPP packages for the Shelby's. it just won't compete on raw numbers with the aftermarket.

The question is can they learn a lesson from the past and price it competitively. Ford and Ford Racing have shot themselves in the foot repeatedly over parts cost in the past and it showed up at the till and lack of sales. It will be telling if they think there is a market just for the Shelby group(now approaching 30 000 cars with both versions) or they want to compete head to head with everybody else both with what is already out there and with what may be coming(Bullitt etc.). I have not seen a huge take up on the three packages they already offer, and the Shelby fans have shown a disturbing propensity to pay whatever they can and a little more for the name and percieved history.

Interesting to see if Ford will heed the enthusiast and use its corporate power to make FRPP a name with street cred and a completly new revenue stream, or just continue to sit back and let everybody else make the sheckles with their heavy lifting( the Ford technology transfer program, repeatedly mentioned again and again at SEMA this year).
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2006 | 12:34 AM
  #17  
hi5.0's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
So it's pretty much a warmed over CS/GT? The extra horses could also come from (in part) requiring premium unleaded fuel to go with more aggressive mapping/tune. Seems easy enough.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2006 | 08:22 AM
  #18  
AFBLUE's Avatar
Dethroned Nascar Guru
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 2
I know many are disappointed by a 310 HP Bullitt, but the original 68 had 0hp over the standard GT. 01 Bullitt only 5 more hp but it was well received.

I guess I don't get where folks were expecting a whopping increase based on this historical perspective.
Now if it was a new Boss or Mach 1, I could understand the disappointment with only a 10 HP increase.
JMO.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2006 | 08:47 AM
  #19  
JonW's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 23, 2005
Posts: 733
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by AFBLUE
I know many are disappointed by a 310 HP Bullitt, but the original 68 had 0hp over the standard GT. 01 Bullitt only 5 more hp but it was well received.

I guess I don't get where folks were expecting a whopping increase based on this historical perspective.
Now if it was a new Boss or Mach 1, I could understand the disappointment with only a 10 HP increase.
JMO.
I have to agree. I think the '08 Bullitt is going to be about image, not performance. And that's fine with me. If they nail the image, I can add the performance.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2006 | 11:36 AM
  #20  
SONICBOOST's Avatar
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 3
From: Temecula,CA
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
I agree. But remember, a 310 HP Bullitt ACTUALLY means a 350 HP Bullitt.
i'm lost?
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:56 AM.