Special Edition News and Rumor Boss? Mach 1?

Boss/Mach "Rumored Facts" from a good source

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 12:03 AM
  #21  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by MustangFanatic
Just for the record, the H/Boss engine is rumored to appear in two sizes initially a 5.8L Mustang version (351 cid) and a 6.2L truck/SUV version both with a 2V OHC design.
Alot of good butt kicking potential with that 2v OHC architecture.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 01:45 PM
  #22  
VAiN's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 28, 2005
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by LBJay
As for a 365HP Terminator 4.6 that would seem kind of wasteful seeing that the FFRP SC can already give the 3V 400 HP.
I think you're forgetting the most important thing... a warranty. I'd take 365+ SCHP w/warranty over 400schp on a stock bottom without a warranty.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 06:31 AM
  #23  
LBJay's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 437
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by VAiN
I think you're forgetting the most important thing... a warranty. I'd take 365+ SCHP w/warranty over 400schp on a stock bottom without a warranty.

For 2007-2008 Ford has a 3/36 warranty on new car dealer installed FRPP Superchargers (400HP and 500HP). No reason why they wouldn't extend that to the full 5/60 when factory installed on production cars. The warranty just adds a few dollars to the cost.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 01:12 PM
  #24  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
From the looks of it, the 500hp super pack isn't covered, but the 400 is
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 02:51 PM
  #25  
LBJay's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 437
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Boomer
From the looks of it, the 500hp super pack isn't covered, but the 400 is
I stand corrected.

I mistook to Limited warranty icon on the FRPP web site as being applied to the 500HP kit.

The 2008 Accessories brochure only lists the 400 HP for the GT and 600 HP GT500 kit with a warranty
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #26  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Yeah, and another bummer...
Looks like the warranty on the S/C is 1/12,000 not 3/36,000
At least its something...just wish it covered the whole bumper to bumper
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 05:18 AM
  #27  
LBJay's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 437
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Boomer
Yeah, and another bummer...
Looks like the warranty on the S/C is 1/12,000 not 3/36,000
At least its something...just wish it covered the whole bumper to bumper

???? If installed on a new car (at delevery) it's 3/36. Any other car up to the end of the normal 3/36, it's 1/12. Either way it doesn't have any effect on the rest of the cars normal bumper to bumper warranty.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 02:04 PM
  #28  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Just saw that...thanks LB
Tres cool...

If warranty was my issue... it would suck.
I'm not new..nor do I even have a year left on my factory 3/36
DOh
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 07:37 AM
  #29  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by rhumb
My ideals:

Boss: 4.6 4V = 375hp; six speed; Brembos; Recaros/Sparcos in stipped down, very serious interior; GT500 nose/tail; IRS (yeah, right) or at least a much better developed suspension and steering than in the current Stang GT/Shelby GT. This would replicate the high-winding, decent handling Trans-Am inspired Boss 302 of "69-'70.

Mach I: 5.4 4V = 400-425hp; six speed or ATX; requisite stripes, scoops, spoilers and other surface bling; drag-pack suspension (tuned for the strip). This would replicate the spirit of the big-block 428 Mach I of '69-'70 with a big, brawny motor and flashier appearance for stoplight and strip racing.

Either would be in the low-mid $30s. These would be very complementary cars, so even if the peak HP is only 25-50hp apart, they would be very different in character and buyer. Of course, such a course is painfully obvious, so of course, Ford will find some rationalization not to do it (and we wonder why they're in such a desperate hole, not-so "Bold Moves" and all?)
Nice idea, Rhumb, but I think you're a bit optimisic on the HP #s. Unless Ford has managed to do some more tricks with the 4V heads, you just can't get enough air into a N/A small bore Mod Motor to turn those sorts of HP #s in emission legal form. 350 HP for the 4.6 and 390 for the 5.4 would be more like it.

I agree a nose heavy 5.4-4V would be more in line with a 69 Mach 1 428 than a Boss.

Regarding weights, those 4V heads are HUGE and HEAVY. A complete 4V head weights around 30 lb more than a 3V head (each head). An AL block 4.6 4V weighs 61 lbs more than the AL 4.6-3V.

With the iron block 4V the situation is even worse, add 60 lb for the heads and another 90 lb for the 5.4 iron block and another 20 lb for all those other 5.4 extras, longer rods, longer cam chains, larger intake, bigger crank, bigger vibration damper, etc. It all means a N/A 5.4-4V will weigh 170 lb. more than the 4.6-3V.

As the after maket tuners have already demonstrated a S/C 4.6-3V appears to be the best HP to weight trade off. It would weigh "only" 560 lb. and could safely have 375 HP and lots of torque with a Ford factory warranty and probably better gas mileage than a 5.4 NA.

Approximate Mod Motor weights:
4.6-3V: 460 lb (AL block) 310 HP
4.6-4V: 521 lb (AL block) 320 HP
4.6-2V: 530 lb (FE block) 260 HP
4.6-3V S/C: 560 lb (AL block) 375 HP est.
5.4-3V: 570 lb (FE block) 350 HP est.
5.4-4V: 630 lb (FE block) 375 HP est.
4.6-4V SC: 690 lb (FE block) 390HP
5.4-4V SC: 730 lb (FE block) 500 HP
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 12:14 PM
  #30  
SuperSugeKnight's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Is the Boss Mustang really going into production? '08 is the Bullitt, '09 is the last year before the refresh. Would they really put out a one year only 5.4L powered Boss Mustang?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 07:30 PM
  #31  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Yeah they could... its not a brand new motor anyway, just some mods to an existing one.

But if they carry over the powertrains the first year of the refresh, they could get more than one year out of it, or just use it at as a one year 400+ N/A engine till the BOSS motors are ready
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 04:24 PM
  #32  
SuperSugeKnight's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Boomer
Yeah they could... its not a brand new motor anyway, just some mods to an existing one.

But if they carry over the powertrains the first year of the refresh, they could get more than one year out of it, or just use it at as a one year 400+ N/A engine till the BOSS motors are ready
Hopefully it's more than one year. I'd like to see some aftermarket parts get developed. My fear is the aftermarket won't take off for the Boss because it would be for one year only.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #33  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by JonW
Won't a 5.4 in the proposed Boss/Mach have the same front-heavy weight issues that have plaqued the Gt 500? Strip out all the unecessary razzmatazz stuff and give us an aluminum block instead. Who needs leather, high-buck stereo, spoiler, etc. when you can have an aluminum block instead?
Despite the detractors of the GT500's iron block, its only about 45 pounds heavier than the 4.6 iron block.

However on a more positive note for anybody wishing to give thier fellow GM buddies the middle finger, the 3v 4.6 V8 in the Mustang weighs in at 420 lbs fully dressed compared to GM's LS engines which weigh 445 pounds fully dressed, so much for the compact lightweight nature of the LS engines , Now if only we could fix that displacement penalty.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 11:30 PM
  #34  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by V10
Approximate Mod Motor weights:
4.6-3V: 460 lb (AL block) 310 HP
Check the FRPP catalog, page 67 for the dressed weight of the engine.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 04:16 PM
  #35  
PACETTR's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 9, 2004
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Already got MY Boss...All aluminum 302, 400hp, awesome suspension and brakes, fuinctional shaker... </p>
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 09:07 PM
  #36  
Treadhead's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 28, 2004
Posts: 3,069
Likes: 2
From: Fort Worth,Tx
Originally Posted by PACETTR
Already got MY Boss...All aluminum 302, 400hp, awesome suspension and brakes, fuinctional shaker...


Yeah, you know we all hate you right?

That is a very nice Stang!
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #37  
PACETTR's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 9, 2004
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Treadhead
Yeah, you know we all hate you right?

That is a very nice Stang!

Don't be mad; I've got a brand new one on the showroom floor you can buy... :stickpoke:
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2007 | 07:49 PM
  #38  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by bob
Despite the detractors of the GT500's iron block, its only about 45 pounds heavier than the 4.6 iron block.
What I was saying is that the 5.4L iron block weighs 90 lb more than the 4.6 aluminum block.

Looking at page 69 of the current FRPP catalog, it says that newer 5.4L iron blocks weigh 15 lb more than older blocks, or 200 lb for a current 5.4L iron block.

So I stand corrected, a current 5.4L iron block weighs 115 lb more than a 4.6L AL block
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2007 | 07:58 PM
  #39  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by bob
Check the FRPP catalog, page 67 for the dressed weight of the engine.
The 460 lb weight I gave for the 4.6L - 3V is "Fully Dressed"

Since the FRPP catalog says "dressed" something(s) must be left off. 530 lb is a well published weight for the old 4.6L - 2V iron block, "fully dressed". I find it hard to believe that the 3V engine dressed the same is 110 lb lighter.

In any case, if we use the 420 lb figure for the 4.6-3V, to come up with the weight of a N/A 5.4-4V we need to add 115 lb for the block, 60 lb for the heads and at least 30 lb for incidentals, larger: crank, rods, front cam chain cover, intake manifold, timing chains, etc.

420 + 115 + 60 + 30 = 625 lb or only 5 lb less than the 630 lb I gave in my earlier post, but "fully dressed" it may weigh as much as 675 lb.! ! ! And in GT-500 S/C form the 5.4 weighs somewhere between 730 and 775 lb! That's 100 to 150 lb heavier than a Boss 429 ! ! ! ! Any way you cut it the iron block 5.4-4V is a pig heavy engine!
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 07:28 AM
  #40  
Speedplease's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: October 29, 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Of course theyre making the Boss. Gotta keep the gearheads at SVT busy right?
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:38 AM.