Boss/Mach "Rumored Facts" from a good source
For 2007-2008 Ford has a 3/36 warranty on new car dealer installed FRPP Superchargers (400HP and 500HP). No reason why they wouldn't extend that to the full 5/60 when factory installed on production cars. The warranty just adds a few dollars to the cost.
I mistook to Limited warranty icon on the FRPP web site as being applied to the 500HP kit.
The 2008 Accessories brochure only lists the 400 HP for the GT and 600 HP GT500 kit with a warranty
???? If installed on a new car (at delevery) it's 3/36. Any other car up to the end of the normal 3/36, it's 1/12. Either way it doesn't have any effect on the rest of the cars normal bumper to bumper warranty.
My ideals:
Boss: 4.6 4V = 375hp; six speed; Brembos; Recaros/Sparcos in stipped down, very serious interior; GT500 nose/tail; IRS (yeah, right) or at least a much better developed suspension and steering than in the current Stang GT/Shelby GT. This would replicate the high-winding, decent handling Trans-Am inspired Boss 302 of "69-'70.
Mach I: 5.4 4V = 400-425hp; six speed or ATX; requisite stripes, scoops, spoilers and other surface bling; drag-pack suspension (tuned for the strip). This would replicate the spirit of the big-block 428 Mach I of '69-'70 with a big, brawny motor and flashier appearance for stoplight and strip racing.
Either would be in the low-mid $30s. These would be very complementary cars, so even if the peak HP is only 25-50hp apart, they would be very different in character and buyer. Of course, such a course is painfully obvious, so of course, Ford will find some rationalization not to do it (and we wonder why they're in such a desperate hole, not-so "Bold Moves" and all?)
Boss: 4.6 4V = 375hp; six speed; Brembos; Recaros/Sparcos in stipped down, very serious interior; GT500 nose/tail; IRS (yeah, right) or at least a much better developed suspension and steering than in the current Stang GT/Shelby GT. This would replicate the high-winding, decent handling Trans-Am inspired Boss 302 of "69-'70.
Mach I: 5.4 4V = 400-425hp; six speed or ATX; requisite stripes, scoops, spoilers and other surface bling; drag-pack suspension (tuned for the strip). This would replicate the spirit of the big-block 428 Mach I of '69-'70 with a big, brawny motor and flashier appearance for stoplight and strip racing.
Either would be in the low-mid $30s. These would be very complementary cars, so even if the peak HP is only 25-50hp apart, they would be very different in character and buyer. Of course, such a course is painfully obvious, so of course, Ford will find some rationalization not to do it (and we wonder why they're in such a desperate hole, not-so "Bold Moves" and all?)
I agree a nose heavy 5.4-4V would be more in line with a 69 Mach 1 428 than a Boss.
Regarding weights, those 4V heads are HUGE and HEAVY. A complete 4V head weights around 30 lb more than a 3V head (each head). An AL block 4.6 4V weighs 61 lbs more than the AL 4.6-3V.
With the iron block 4V the situation is even worse, add 60 lb for the heads and another 90 lb for the 5.4 iron block and another 20 lb for all those other 5.4 extras, longer rods, longer cam chains, larger intake, bigger crank, bigger vibration damper, etc. It all means a N/A 5.4-4V will weigh 170 lb. more than the 4.6-3V.
As the after maket tuners have already demonstrated a S/C 4.6-3V appears to be the best HP to weight trade off. It would weigh "only" 560 lb. and could safely have 375 HP and lots of torque with a Ford factory warranty and probably better gas mileage than a 5.4 NA.
Approximate Mod Motor weights:
4.6-3V: 460 lb (AL block) 310 HP
4.6-4V: 521 lb (AL block) 320 HP
4.6-2V: 530 lb (FE block) 260 HP
4.6-3V S/C: 560 lb (AL block) 375 HP est.
5.4-3V: 570 lb (FE block) 350 HP est.
5.4-4V: 630 lb (FE block) 375 HP est.
4.6-4V SC: 690 lb (FE block) 390HP
5.4-4V SC: 730 lb (FE block) 500 HP
Yeah they could... its not a brand new motor anyway, just some mods to an existing one.
But if they carry over the powertrains the first year of the refresh, they could get more than one year out of it, or just use it at as a one year 400+ N/A engine till the BOSS motors are ready
But if they carry over the powertrains the first year of the refresh, they could get more than one year out of it, or just use it at as a one year 400+ N/A engine till the BOSS motors are ready
Yeah they could... its not a brand new motor anyway, just some mods to an existing one.
But if they carry over the powertrains the first year of the refresh, they could get more than one year out of it, or just use it at as a one year 400+ N/A engine till the BOSS motors are ready
But if they carry over the powertrains the first year of the refresh, they could get more than one year out of it, or just use it at as a one year 400+ N/A engine till the BOSS motors are ready
Won't a 5.4 in the proposed Boss/Mach have the same front-heavy weight issues that have plaqued the Gt 500? Strip out all the unecessary razzmatazz stuff and give us an aluminum block instead. Who needs leather, high-buck stereo, spoiler, etc. when you can have an aluminum block instead?


However on a more positive note for anybody wishing to give thier fellow GM buddies the middle finger, the 3v 4.6 V8 in the Mustang weighs in at 420 lbs fully dressed compared to GM's LS engines which weigh 445 pounds fully dressed, so much for the compact lightweight nature of the LS engines
, Now if only we could fix that displacement penalty.
Looking at page 69 of the current FRPP catalog, it says that newer 5.4L iron blocks weigh 15 lb more than older blocks, or 200 lb for a current 5.4L iron block.
So I stand corrected, a current 5.4L iron block weighs 115 lb more than a 4.6L AL block
The 460 lb weight I gave for the 4.6L - 3V is "Fully Dressed"
Since the FRPP catalog says "dressed" something(s) must be left off. 530 lb is a well published weight for the old 4.6L - 2V iron block, "fully dressed". I find it hard to believe that the 3V engine dressed the same is 110 lb lighter.
In any case, if we use the 420 lb figure for the 4.6-3V, to come up with the weight of a N/A 5.4-4V we need to add 115 lb for the block, 60 lb for the heads and at least 30 lb for incidentals, larger: crank, rods, front cam chain cover, intake manifold, timing chains, etc.
420 + 115 + 60 + 30 = 625 lb or only 5 lb less than the 630 lb I gave in my earlier post, but "fully dressed" it may weigh as much as 675 lb.! ! ! And in GT-500 S/C form the 5.4 weighs somewhere between 730 and 775 lb! That's 100 to 150 lb heavier than a Boss 429 ! ! ! ! Any way you cut it the iron block 5.4-4V is a pig heavy engine!
Since the FRPP catalog says "dressed" something(s) must be left off. 530 lb is a well published weight for the old 4.6L - 2V iron block, "fully dressed". I find it hard to believe that the 3V engine dressed the same is 110 lb lighter.
In any case, if we use the 420 lb figure for the 4.6-3V, to come up with the weight of a N/A 5.4-4V we need to add 115 lb for the block, 60 lb for the heads and at least 30 lb for incidentals, larger: crank, rods, front cam chain cover, intake manifold, timing chains, etc.
420 + 115 + 60 + 30 = 625 lb or only 5 lb less than the 630 lb I gave in my earlier post, but "fully dressed" it may weigh as much as 675 lb.! ! ! And in GT-500 S/C form the 5.4 weighs somewhere between 730 and 775 lb! That's 100 to 150 lb heavier than a Boss 429 ! ! ! ! Any way you cut it the iron block 5.4-4V is a pig heavy engine!



