Shelby GT June's issue of Car and Driver
#1
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shelby GT June's issue of Car and Driver
Car and Driver compared it to Nissan 350Z, Mazda RX-8 and Audi TT.
Shelby GT finished dead last.
They didn't like:
-Worst handling in the group.
-Front suspension was compared to 20-year-old truck,
-Big vibrations on rough stretch of road (severe enough that the hood clips worked themselves lose).
-Brakes sucks.
-Hurst shifter is very high.
-Speedometer too crowded.
-Cheap interior.
Mazda won, Audi was 2nd, Nissan was 3rd.
Shelby GT finished dead last.
They didn't like:
-Worst handling in the group.
-Front suspension was compared to 20-year-old truck,
-Big vibrations on rough stretch of road (severe enough that the hood clips worked themselves lose).
-Brakes sucks.
-Hurst shifter is very high.
-Speedometer too crowded.
-Cheap interior.
Mazda won, Audi was 2nd, Nissan was 3rd.
#2
#7
#9
Legacy TMS Member
Car and Driver compared it to Nissan 350Z, Mazda RX-8 and Audi TT.
Shelby GT finished dead last.
They didn't like:
-Worst handling in the group.
-Front suspension was compared to 20-year-old truck,
-Big vibrations on rough stretch of road (severe enough that the hood clips worked themselves lose).
-Brakes sucks.
-Hurst shifter is very high.
-Speedometer too crowded.
-Cheap interior.
Mazda won, Audi was 2nd, Nissan was 3rd.
Shelby GT finished dead last.
They didn't like:
-Worst handling in the group.
-Front suspension was compared to 20-year-old truck,
-Big vibrations on rough stretch of road (severe enough that the hood clips worked themselves lose).
-Brakes sucks.
-Hurst shifter is very high.
-Speedometer too crowded.
-Cheap interior.
Mazda won, Audi was 2nd, Nissan was 3rd.
That car was probably beat on too much!
#10
I like the 'best looking' language, but lay your other dumb cliches to rest. The world has changed.
#11
Shelby GT June's issue of Car and Driver
<HR style="COLOR: #d1d1e1" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->
Read this C&D story.
My first impression was that comparing the Shelby to two actual sports cars, TT & 350z and the RX-8, whatever the hell it is, was like comparing a fighter aircraft to a battleship.
Machines built to do two completely differently jobs.
<!--StartFragment -->Finesse vs brute strength
Currently there are no other cars on the market comparable to Mustangs/Shelby's. At least not until the new Camaro's come out.
To even consider the Shelby a sports car or the others a "muscle" car is
completely stoopid. C&D dropped the ball on this one.
Their comparison was completely bogus.
Read this C&D story.
My first impression was that comparing the Shelby to two actual sports cars, TT & 350z and the RX-8, whatever the hell it is, was like comparing a fighter aircraft to a battleship.
Machines built to do two completely differently jobs.
<!--StartFragment -->Finesse vs brute strength
Currently there are no other cars on the market comparable to Mustangs/Shelby's. At least not until the new Camaro's come out.
To even consider the Shelby a sports car or the others a "muscle" car is
completely stoopid. C&D dropped the ball on this one.
Their comparison was completely bogus.
#12
Well the two best cars finished last. My friend has a 350z and he's long since given up racing me. The all-around lousy TT and the underpowered RX8??? 350 is a great car, 07 used RX8's can be found by the boat load(they are actually easier to find on used car lots then on the road, and they are death to try to sell. Guess what the ALL get traded in for...). We stopped trying to sell RX8's long ago-they all go straight to wholesale, we don't need any gargoyles on the used car lot.
Don't understand the support whatever stuff, Ford owns Mazda, Renault Nissan, and Germany isn't a communist or terror nation either
C&D 'testers' have never figured out how to drive powerful cars, so who cares what they say anyway?
Don't understand the support whatever stuff, Ford owns Mazda, Renault Nissan, and Germany isn't a communist or terror nation either
C&D 'testers' have never figured out how to drive powerful cars, so who cares what they say anyway?
#13
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The comparison of the front suspension to the 20 yr old truck was funny, since the design was touted to be similar to BMW's in the Ford press materials.
That car was probably beat on too much!
That car was probably beat on too much!
BMWs, on the other hand, generally don't have particularly exotic suspensions, heck, my M3 has good ol' McPherson struts just like the Hyundai econo-beater rustin next to it. The difference is the exquisite fine tuning and balance that BMW imparts upon these relatively pedestrian pieces. The result is typically excellent if hardly stunning test track numbers but real world hanlding, performance and balance that borders on the preternatural.
It doesn't help that the GT's clumsily tuned front suspension is further let down by a rear suspension that does, in fact, resemble a 20-, or 50-, year old truck suspension and brakes more befitting the above-mentioned Hyundai than a true track car with the Shelby name on it.
Sure, a big, honking motor is great, as the GT certainly does have, but is hardly the end all, be all of a broad spectrum performance car. The Shelby GT clearly is a quick, cheap (well, for Ford and Shelby at least) and easy FRPP catalog throw-together project that unforetunately suffers greatly from any real chassis tuning to make all those tossed together parts actually play well with each other.
#15
Legacy TMS Member
Well, that is a good illustration of potential over execution. The front suspension design is rather similar to a 3-series BMW or even the old Flat Rock built, Mazda-engineered Probe/MX6/626, which was pretty darned good (I know, I have both). But the inherent strengths of the design were compromised by poor, overly stiff tuning typical of Detroit that generally results in pretty impressive test-track numbers but horrible real-world road manners.
BMWs, on the other hand, generally don't have particularly exotic suspensions, heck, my M3 has good ol' McPherson struts just like the Hyundai econo-beater rustin next to it. The difference is the exquisite fine tuning and balance that BMW imparts upon these relatively pedestrian pieces. The result is typically excellent if hardly stunning test track numbers but real world hanlding, performance and balance that borders on the preternatural.
It doesn't help that the GT's clumsily tuned front suspension is further let down by a rear suspension that does, in fact, resemble a 20-, or 50-, year old truck suspension and brakes more befitting the above-mentioned Hyundai than a true track car with the Shelby name on it.
As for the rear, depsite it being a live axle, it is better optimized than the last generation in the street version. It would be better (most likely) with an indepedent set-up, of course, as has been mentioned here many times.
Sure, a big, honking motor is great, as the GT certainly does have, but is hardly the end all, be all of a broad spectrum performance car. The Shelby GT clearly is a quick, cheap (well, for Ford and Shelby at least) and easy FRPP catalog throw-together project that unforetunately suffers greatly from any real chassis tuning to make all those tossed together parts actually play well with each other.
It has been my experience that some auto writers seem to extend the hyperbole so much that one thinks something is either better or worse than it really is. In comparison to the group, it might have been "lacking", but when people drive these on the streets, you might be talking about differences that are not as noticeable, except in certain situations. I have have drive a few independent rear suspension cars (Nissan 300ZX, 350Z) that one would swear were jumpy like a live axle car when going into a corner with sharp, short bumps that were close together.
In my opinion, you need to drive it to make an assessment.
PS - I think a 6.0L V8 or bigger is a "honking motor".
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post