Man, The Gt500 Is A Pig!!
#1
Cobra Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
Man, The Gt500 Is A Pig!!
A Base Corvette W/ 400 Hp Beats Up At 500hp Stang!! Thats Sad!!
The Vette Is 600 Lbs Lighter. That Like Having 3 Extra People In Your Stang. Of Course That Effects The Performance. Very Dissappointed. When I First Saw The Front Page I Thought It Was Going To Be The Z06 Vette Vs Gt500 Instead They Didnt Even Need One To Compare. Ford Wake Up.
The Vette Is 600 Lbs Lighter. That Like Having 3 Extra People In Your Stang. Of Course That Effects The Performance. Very Dissappointed. When I First Saw The Front Page I Thought It Was Going To Be The Z06 Vette Vs Gt500 Instead They Didnt Even Need One To Compare. Ford Wake Up.
#3
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Originally Posted by elvism
Man, The Gt500 Is A Pig!!
#4
Mid - American Ford Performance and Shelby Meet --NO PICTURES
Just got back from a quick run to the parking lots at the local motel headquarters for the meet that starts tomorrow and runs to Sunday....
Saw....
GT 500 Shelby convertible, vista blue
GT 500 Shelby coupe, tungsten grey
California Special convertible, white
Both Shelbys had Michigan manufacturer plates...looks like they were driven and not trucked
Should be several "Mustang Source" members there to take pictures and provide information when the meet starts tomorrow.
Saw....
GT 500 Shelby convertible, vista blue
GT 500 Shelby coupe, tungsten grey
California Special convertible, white
Both Shelbys had Michigan manufacturer plates...looks like they were driven and not trucked
Should be several "Mustang Source" members there to take pictures and provide information when the meet starts tomorrow.
#5
Moderator........please move to proper location
#7
Cobra Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
i know its a 4 seater but have u ever sat in the back?
thats not a back seat. my 4 year old is tight back there. anyway did you see in that 0-150mph the shelby is 3 seconds slower then the vette. thats alot. and if you go read in the same issue the bmw M6 ran 0-150 in 19.5 compared to 30.3 for the shelby. thats a life time. i know the m6 is 100k car but both have 500 hp and both weigh about the same the bmw M6 12lb heavier. im just bumped out that these numbers from MT,C&D,R&T MAGAZINES..maybe FF&MM come up with better #?
#10
0-60 in 4.5 and the 1/4 is a pokey 12.9. Just saying pokey for the amount of Horsepower it has...maybe due to a conservative tune?
Is that worth 45k?
I'd rather charge my GT and be faster since WE're lighter.
Is that worth 45k?
I'd rather charge my GT and be faster since WE're lighter.
#11
Motortrend and Hot Rod both seemed like they still liked it a lot though despite some short comings. Motortrend atleast compared it to cars that were more in it's class. I don't usually like anything Car and Driver has to say anyway
![Dunno](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#12
I Have No Life
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
M-A-G-A-Z-I-N-E N-U-M-B-E-R-S
That's all I'm saying.
So if you were magazine or Grand Tourismo racing, I guess yeah it would be slower than the base vette....
That's all I'm saying.
So if you were magazine or Grand Tourismo racing, I guess yeah it would be slower than the base vette....
#13
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: February 26, 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boomer
M-A-G-A-Z-I-N-E N-U-M-B-E-R-S
Vette is a basically a poor man's supercar, while the Mustang is a Muscle/Sports Tourer type car. Also it might be a good bit heavier and just a tick behind the C6 (mag times), but the GT500 has a lot more power potential with the blown 5.4 from the factory. I say wait and see the actual potential of the car when real drag racers get their hands on them, with some stickier meats on the back with some competent drivers piloting them down the track.
#14
Originally Posted by tw0scoops123
0-60 in 4.5 and the 1/4 is a pokey 12.9. Just saying pokey for the amount of Horsepower it has...maybe due to a conservative tune?
Is that worth 45k?
I'd rather charge my GT and be faster since WE're lighter.
Is that worth 45k?
I'd rather charge my GT and be faster since WE're lighter.
#15
Originally Posted by elvism
thats not a back seat. my 4 year old is tight back there.
My 11 year old and my 8 year old (tall girls) have no problems. riding in the back seat of my S197. The 11 year old is as big as a small adult (5ft tall). I am 6'6" tall and my seat is back all the way. Their feet are tight when riding behind me, but the rest of the seat is fine.
Anyhow, comparing a GT (car style, not the name of the car model) to a sports car is an effort in futility.
You know what really sucks about the Corvette? I can't fit a 4'x8' sheet of plywood in the back. I can't believe they put out a $45K car and expect people to buy it if you can't run to Home Depot and pick up big supplies.
![Smile](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#16
Originally Posted by bigaloz
12.7 @116 were the numbers, and a trap speed of 116 is very low 12's/high 11's
#17
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Originally Posted by elvism
... 0-150mph the shelby is 3 seconds slower then the vette...
I would be more concerned with 0- 60.
#19
Cobra Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
im just disappointed in the #'s thats all. i was
considering the shelby for next year or maybe if the bullitt or boss come all. you guys are saying wait for FF&MM to test the shelby for better numbers. MM&FF may get better number which i hope but that doesnt make sense since the magazine drivers are driving the other car at the same playing field and time. when MM&FF test the shelby then they should test the vette. it not like one magazine tested the vette and then the other magazine tested the shelby. you have to compare apples to apples.