Man, The Gt500 Is A Pig!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/7/06, 02:12 PM
  #1  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
elvism's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 13, 2004
Location: jersey
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Man, The Gt500 Is A Pig!!

A Base Corvette W/ 400 Hp Beats Up At 500hp Stang!! Thats Sad!!
The Vette Is 600 Lbs Lighter. That Like Having 3 Extra People In Your Stang. Of Course That Effects The Performance. Very Dissappointed. When I First Saw The Front Page I Thought It Was Going To Be The Z06 Vette Vs Gt500 Instead They Didnt Even Need One To Compare. Ford Wake Up.
Old 6/7/06, 02:18 PM
  #2  
V6 Member
 
kepfordj's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 23, 2006
Location: White, SD
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At least in a Stang you can fit 3 extra people..........
Old 6/7/06, 04:03 PM
  #3  
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
1 COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: U S A
Posts: 7,737
Received 343 Likes on 216 Posts
Originally Posted by elvism
Man, The Gt500 Is A Pig!!
The same song was being played almost as often as now prior to the '03 Cobra realese. With the exception of the Stallion concept and 2K Cobra R there is not one other Mustang that can keep up with it, or most cars for that matter.
Old 6/7/06, 04:50 PM
  #4  
 
T Town Bobby D's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 10, 2005
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mid - American Ford Performance and Shelby Meet --NO PICTURES

Just got back from a quick run to the parking lots at the local motel headquarters for the meet that starts tomorrow and runs to Sunday....

Saw....

GT 500 Shelby convertible, vista blue
GT 500 Shelby coupe, tungsten grey
California Special convertible, white

Both Shelbys had Michigan manufacturer plates...looks like they were driven and not trucked

Should be several "Mustang Source" members there to take pictures and provide information when the meet starts tomorrow.
Old 6/7/06, 04:51 PM
  #5  
 
T Town Bobby D's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 10, 2005
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Moderator........please move to proper location
Old 6/7/06, 05:24 PM
  #6  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
If i believed everything I read in a magazine....
I'd be... well... ..not smart...
Old 6/7/06, 07:25 PM
  #7  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
elvism's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 13, 2004
Location: jersey
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i know its a 4 seater but have u ever sat in the back?

thats not a back seat. my 4 year old is tight back there. anyway did you see in that 0-150mph the shelby is 3 seconds slower then the vette. thats alot. and if you go read in the same issue the bmw M6 ran 0-150 in 19.5 compared to 30.3 for the shelby. thats a life time. i know the m6 is 100k car but both have 500 hp and both weigh about the same the bmw M6 12lb heavier. im just bumped out that these numbers from MT,C&D,R&T MAGAZINES..maybe FF&MM come up with better #?
Old 6/8/06, 06:20 AM
  #8  
msd
Member
 
msd's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 26, 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
News Flash: Corvette is a lightweight sports car, Mustang is a heavy muscle car.
Old 6/8/06, 06:30 AM
  #9  
Bullitt Member
 
bigaloz's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 11, 2005
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Muscle Mustang & Fast Fords will have much better numbers. Those other mags can't drive.
Old 6/8/06, 06:39 AM
  #10  
Mach 1 Member
 
tw0scoops123's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 17, 2005
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
0-60 in 4.5 and the 1/4 is a pokey 12.9. Just saying pokey for the amount of Horsepower it has...maybe due to a conservative tune?

Is that worth 45k?

I'd rather charge my GT and be faster since WE're lighter.
Old 6/8/06, 06:40 AM
  #11  
Bullitt Member
 
instigator311's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 21, 2005
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Motortrend and Hot Rod both seemed like they still liked it a lot though despite some short comings. Motortrend atleast compared it to cars that were more in it's class. I don't usually like anything Car and Driver has to say anyway
Old 6/8/06, 06:44 AM
  #12  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
M-A-G-A-Z-I-N-E N-U-M-B-E-R-S

That's all I'm saying.

So if you were magazine or Grand Tourismo racing, I guess yeah it would be slower than the base vette....
Old 6/8/06, 08:44 AM
  #13  
Bullitt Member
 
CatmanJJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 26, 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boomer
M-A-G-A-Z-I-N-E N-U-M-B-E-R-S
+1

Vette is a basically a poor man's supercar, while the Mustang is a Muscle/Sports Tourer type car. Also it might be a good bit heavier and just a tick behind the C6 (mag times), but the GT500 has a lot more power potential with the blown 5.4 from the factory. I say wait and see the actual potential of the car when real drag racers get their hands on them, with some stickier meats on the back with some competent drivers piloting them down the track.
Old 6/8/06, 10:44 AM
  #14  
Bullitt Member
 
bigaloz's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 11, 2005
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tw0scoops123
0-60 in 4.5 and the 1/4 is a pokey 12.9. Just saying pokey for the amount of Horsepower it has...maybe due to a conservative tune?

Is that worth 45k?

I'd rather charge my GT and be faster since WE're lighter.
12.7 @116 were the numbers, and a trap speed of 116 is very low 12's/high 11's
Old 6/8/06, 11:06 AM
  #15  
Mach 1 Member
 
BillP's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 11, 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by elvism
thats not a back seat. my 4 year old is tight back there.
Then maybe your 4 year old is huge.

My 11 year old and my 8 year old (tall girls) have no problems. riding in the back seat of my S197. The 11 year old is as big as a small adult (5ft tall). I am 6'6" tall and my seat is back all the way. Their feet are tight when riding behind me, but the rest of the seat is fine.

Anyhow, comparing a GT (car style, not the name of the car model) to a sports car is an effort in futility.

You know what really sucks about the Corvette? I can't fit a 4'x8' sheet of plywood in the back. I can't believe they put out a $45K car and expect people to buy it if you can't run to Home Depot and pick up big supplies.

Old 6/8/06, 11:08 AM
  #16  
Mach 1 Member
 
BillP's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 11, 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigaloz
12.7 @116 were the numbers, and a trap speed of 116 is very low 12's/high 11's
Which leads me to believe that with better rear tires and a deeper rear end ratio, it will be hitting low 12's or better.
Old 6/8/06, 11:40 AM
  #17  
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
1 COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: U S A
Posts: 7,737
Received 343 Likes on 216 Posts
Originally Posted by elvism
... 0-150mph the shelby is 3 seconds slower then the vette...
That might be important to 1 in a 1,000. Just like top speed.

I would be more concerned with 0- 60.
Old 6/8/06, 11:42 AM
  #18  
Bullitt Member
 
68notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CatmanJJ
+1

Vette is a basically a poor man's supercar
I prefer calling it the "whitetrash supercar."
Old 6/8/06, 12:06 PM
  #19  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
elvism's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 13, 2004
Location: jersey
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
im just disappointed in the #'s thats all. i was

considering the shelby for next year or maybe if the bullitt or boss come all. you guys are saying wait for FF&MM to test the shelby for better numbers. MM&FF may get better number which i hope but that doesnt make sense since the magazine drivers are driving the other car at the same playing field and time. when MM&FF test the shelby then they should test the vette. it not like one magazine tested the vette and then the other magazine tested the shelby. you have to compare apples to apples.
Old 6/8/06, 12:13 PM
  #20  
Post *****
 
Evil_Capri's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,153
Received 72 Likes on 65 Posts
MM&FF may in fact test the GT500 with a Vette. When the Mach 1 came out they tested it against a GTO.


Quick Reply: Man, The Gt500 Is A Pig!!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:00 PM.