How Ford could have made 500hp naturally aspirated on the GT500.
#83
TMS West Coast Correspondent
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BC I dont know how we ended getting to be so hostile, I enjoy the debates, I wouldve gladly looked up those figures for you and if I was wrong would have gladly admitted it as well, but as of last night when I made that post (3:30 AM) I was tired and had been drinking and didnt feel like it, not trying to make excuses, but in the future I will definately make more of an effort to provide some concrete examples for you instead of conjecture. To clarify my thoughts as to the why I believed the 350Z to have outsold the G35, not only came from their being so many improvements and changes made to the car, nor from the price increases, nor just from the fact that there are specialty versions of it where there have been none so far for the G35, but also like you from speaking to dealers and people in the industry as well as personal observation, I really can't remember the last time I saw a G35 on the road here, I do know when they first came out they were about as common as the 350Z, but at that time even those were a rare sighting, then the 350Z ran a away with the dominance on the roads here. But again I should have more concrete evidence than that and will work on it for the next upcoming debate.
#84
The Japanese "R35" or Skyline = G35. The R34 was the most recent actual GTR, not even the Japanese have anything newer.
*Edit: ...unless you're talking about the concept of a few years back (which was, after all, just a concept).
*Edit: ...unless you're talking about the concept of a few years back (which was, after all, just a concept).
#86
Originally Posted by alrox
From here: http://www.caranddriver.com/carnews/...line-gt-r.html
Whether it’s called the Nissan Skyline GT-R or just the Nissan GT-R, the 2009 model is expected to cost $75,000 when it goes on sale in the U.S. in the spring of 2008.
Whether it’s called the Nissan Skyline GT-R or just the Nissan GT-R, the 2009 model is expected to cost $75,000 when it goes on sale in the U.S. in the spring of 2008.
Only really fast Skylines have been the GT-R V-Specs etc which have carbon fibre hoods and whatnot. this GT-R is gunna be a really really souped up G35...
Same platform, very similar styling, only difference is that the engine and drivetrain will be diff, likely heavier since the skyline is expected to make 400-500 hp, and the G35 only makes 300. So beef up that tranny, ad a transfer case, front differential, specialized front suspension, larger v6, with single or twin turbos, plus an intercooler.... I dont' see this thing weighing any less than the GT500, or even really providing any kind of competition with that weight...
And remember it's a Nissan, the only people who praise Skylines tend to be the younger crowd who can't afford $75-80K...
#87
TMS West Coast Correspondent
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Akurei14
Uh you do realize that the skyline is awd and thus has a very hefty curb weight, like Gt500 range right?
Only really fast Skylines have been the GT-R V-Specs etc which have carbon fibre hoods and whatnot. this GT-R is gunna be a really really souped up G35...
Same platform, very similar styling, only difference is that the engine and drivetrain will be diff, likely heavier since the skyline is expected to make 400-500 hp, and the G35 only makes 300. So beef up that tranny, ad a transfer case, front differential, specialized front suspension, larger v6, with single or twin turbos, plus an intercooler.... I dont' see this thing weighing any less than the GT500, or even really providing any kind of competition with that weight...
And remember it's a Nissan, the only people who praise Skylines tend to be the younger crowd who can't afford $75-80K...
Only really fast Skylines have been the GT-R V-Specs etc which have carbon fibre hoods and whatnot. this GT-R is gunna be a really really souped up G35...
Same platform, very similar styling, only difference is that the engine and drivetrain will be diff, likely heavier since the skyline is expected to make 400-500 hp, and the G35 only makes 300. So beef up that tranny, ad a transfer case, front differential, specialized front suspension, larger v6, with single or twin turbos, plus an intercooler.... I dont' see this thing weighing any less than the GT500, or even really providing any kind of competition with that weight...
And remember it's a Nissan, the only people who praise Skylines tend to be the younger crowd who can't afford $75-80K...
#88
TMS West Coast Correspondent
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
Hostel...?!
You haven't seen me when I'm hostile.
Don't sweat it, it's all good.
You haven't seen me when I'm hostile.
Don't sweat it, it's all good.
#89
Originally Posted by rrobello
Like I already said, I agree with you it hasnt been working for Ford but it isnt because people arent wanting a value on a car, they do and are willing to give up a little bit of quality for a larger savings than what they are losing in quality, but like I mentioned if the savings doesnt exceed the loss in quality then they will not purchase the vehicle or if the gain in quality of a superior product exceeds the additional cost then they will buy the more expensive one (in plain English so maybe you can understand this time: if BMW makes a similar car that is superior to a Ford but the the superiority of that car doesnt justify the additional 35-40K for it then people wont buy it, but if BMW were to build the same car and compare it to the same Ford but this time the price difference was less then 20K then more people might be apt to spending more money on the BMW. Did you follow the logic this time around?) The reason Ford is losing money is because they arent creating this value purchase with many of their cars, and unfortunately for them the Mustang isnt their only car on the market, the rest of their line is falling short in this value area and thus people are spending more on a better quality vehicle elsewhere because that is the value purchase.
#90
[quote=427sohc]As I said above...
Even Honda is making 237 hp out approximately 131 cid.
1.8 hp per cubic inch.
On a 4.6 that's 505 hp...and a nice light front end-
No offense intended, but...
Is anyone going to mention the age old truism that small engines will ALWAYS make make more power/liter than big engines, all things being equal? This HP/L comparison is lame, and will always favor the smaller engine. Yamaha R6 engines make 200 HP/L naturally aspirated, and rev to 16,000 RPM. So what? This will always be true of smaller engines when all factors (such as quality of internal parts) are equal. Smaller engines will always rev higher and win the HP/L battle in an apples-apples comparison.
Even Honda is making 237 hp out approximately 131 cid.
1.8 hp per cubic inch.
On a 4.6 that's 505 hp...and a nice light front end-
No offense intended, but...
Is anyone going to mention the age old truism that small engines will ALWAYS make make more power/liter than big engines, all things being equal? This HP/L comparison is lame, and will always favor the smaller engine. Yamaha R6 engines make 200 HP/L naturally aspirated, and rev to 16,000 RPM. So what? This will always be true of smaller engines when all factors (such as quality of internal parts) are equal. Smaller engines will always rev higher and win the HP/L battle in an apples-apples comparison.
#91
Originally Posted by Fordracing200
YOu don't understand, natural aspiration sucks, FO allows for a much better mod for mod power gain because of the blower, plus if they'd of done a NA motor they'd of used cheap-*** internals, but it doesn't matter because the GT500 has that pos truck block that cant take any power unless its got a girdle and all, but once all strengthed the truck guys say it can take 1000hp along with the stock crank, so who knows?
#92
TMS West Coast Correspondent
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by n3cr0mncr
Well put, but you are slightly off base. Most people who buy BMWs buy them not for the improved quality, but for the recognition that they will receive for driving it. Think of it this way....you are a doctor....you can afford a $90,000 car without blinking.....Ford makes a $50,000 car that is just as reliable, but not as fast as BMWs 7XX (keep in mind, i am making this up....e.g. This is only a story, not truth implied)....are you going to buy the $50,000 Ford, or the $89,000 beamer? A large majority of the people in the US would answer "the BMW". Why? Because of the status that is associated with owning a car with the BMW logo on it....and the lack of status associated with the Ford logo. As with anything, there are exceptions.....but people buy cars more for status or for functionality than for any other reasons. You can even see it on this site. Posts from people saying that they have taken delivery of X mustang.....everyone congradulates them like they just won the Daytona 500....all they did was buy a car and everyone wants to be them. It is a status symbol in the group that they associate with. BMW is the status symbol for the more well off groups.....Ford is the status symbol for the group where 1 out of 3 people own a car. Within the Ford lineup there are cars that step out of those bounds (the Mustang....GT....the new Thunderbird....even maybe the F150) but for the most part Ford is giving a car that can be afforded by the group of people willing to pay them for a car.
#93
Closet American
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by n3cr0mncr
Well put, but you are slightly off base. Most people who buy BMWs buy them not for the improved quality, but for the recognition that they will receive for driving it. Think of it this way....you are a doctor....you can afford a $90,000 car without blinking.....Ford makes a $50,000 car that is just as reliable, but not as fast as BMWs 7XX (keep in mind, i am making this up....e.g. This is only a story, not truth implied)....are you going to buy the $50,000 Ford, or the $89,000 beamer? A large majority of the people in the US would answer "the BMW". Why? Because of the status that is associated with owning a car with the BMW logo on it....and the lack of status associated with the Ford logo. As with anything, there are exceptions.....but people buy cars more for status or for functionality than for any other reasons. You can even see it on this site. Posts from people saying that they have taken delivery of X mustang.....everyone congradulates them like they just won the Daytona 500....all they did was buy a car and everyone wants to be them. It is a status symbol in the group that they associate with. BMW is the status symbol for the more well off groups.....Ford is the status symbol for the group where 1 out of 3 people own a car. Within the Ford lineup there are cars that step out of those bounds (the Mustang....GT....the new Thunderbird....even maybe the F150) but for the most part Ford is giving a car that can be afforded by the group of people willing to pay them for a car.
First, let's separate the issues of "quality" and "reliability" - cause they're two different animals. While I agree that Ford products are probably generally as reliable as BMWs (with some notable exceptions), and sometimes even more reliable, there is no way Ford quality (as defined by engineering, materials choice and fit & finish) can hold a candle to BMW.
#94
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
That's not altogether true, either. While I agree that many buy Bimmers as a "status symbol," there are an equal number of people who appreciate driving who buy them for the engineering and superlative driving feel.
First, let's separate the issues of "quality" and "reliability" - cause they're two different animals. While I agree that Ford products are probably generally as reliable as BMWs (with some notable exceptions), and sometimes even more reliable, there is no way Ford quality (as defined by engineering, materials choice and fit & finish) can hold a candle to BMW.
First, let's separate the issues of "quality" and "reliability" - cause they're two different animals. While I agree that Ford products are probably generally as reliable as BMWs (with some notable exceptions), and sometimes even more reliable, there is no way Ford quality (as defined by engineering, materials choice and fit & finish) can hold a candle to BMW.
#95
Closet American
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by n3cr0mncr
That is the very reason why I said that that example was purely a fabrication. I definitely know that there is a significant difference in the two brands. I was just trying to make that point that.....all things equal....more people would pay the money for a BMW than for a Ford, simply for the status brought on by the name, if they could afford it.
#96
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: September 2, 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by n3cr0mncr
I was just trying to make that point that.....all things equal....more people would pay the money for a BMW than for a Ford, simply for the status brought on by the name, if they could afford it.
#97
TMS West Coast Correspondent
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by max2000jp
That makes no sense. The reason why BMW has a name is they build quality products. If Ford built products that were at the same level as BMW, it would also have the status. Ford builds at best average products, hence the position it's marketed.
#98
Closet American
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by rrobello
I dont know if the quality of the product really has as much to do with status as does the price tag, if Ford charged as much as BMW then it may have the same status, but if they built better cars and still were cheaper would it still be a status symbol?
Sure, ****** buy Bimmers. Everybody knows that. But these are mutually exclusive points we're discussing here. When it comes to engineering, paint quality, fit, finish, amenities and overall driving feel, BMW has it all over Ford.
And that's just the way it is.
#99
TMS West Coast Correspondent
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
Well that's very hypothetical. Ford couldn't build better cars (equivalent to BMW) without significantly increasing their prices. On the other hand, if they could match Honda and Toyota on ALL quality fronts (which they soon must to survive) they could certainly charge a little more (as much as their Japanese peers, for example), and people would pay it...and they would return to profitability.
Sure, ****** buy Bimmers. Everybody knows that. But these are mutually exclusive points we're discussing here. When it comes to engineering, paint quality, fit, finish, amenities and overall driving feel, BMW has it all over Ford.
And that's just the way it is.
Sure, ****** buy Bimmers. Everybody knows that. But these are mutually exclusive points we're discussing here. When it comes to engineering, paint quality, fit, finish, amenities and overall driving feel, BMW has it all over Ford.
And that's just the way it is.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Diode Dynamics
Vendor Showcase
3
6/12/18 03:26 PM
ssjbuu
Repair and Service Help
6
8/28/15 08:55 AM