How Ford could have made 500hp naturally aspirated on the GT500.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 03:01 PM
  #61  
rrobello's Avatar
TMS West Coast Correspondent
 
Joined: October 14, 2004
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by max2000jp
I am sure you are referring to FRPP's crate motors. Both motors aren't EFI and won't pass modern emissions. Both motors are weak compared to the Bow Tie 572's from GMPP.
isnt that what I said?

they are still playing catch up with chevy on the crate motor front
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 03:09 PM
  #62  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by rrobello
isnt that what I said?

they are still playing catch up with chevy on the crate motor front
You can add Mopar to the list too in regards to playing catch up. The fact of the matter is that Ford is playing catch up in engine development period. We are being outgunned by DCX and GM in the HP wars.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 03:14 PM
  #63  
rrobello's Avatar
TMS West Coast Correspondent
 
Joined: October 14, 2004
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by max2000jp
You can add Mopar to the list too in regards to playing catch up. The fact of the matter is that Ford is playing catch up in engine development period. We are being outgunned by DCX and GM in the HP wars.
no arguement there, Ford is definately behind, but hopefully they will start catching up, the crate motor department is a good start and it will eventually trickle down into their production cars......I HOPE!!!
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 03:28 PM
  #64  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by rrobello
no arguement there, Ford is definately behind, but hopefully they will start catching up, the crate motor department is a good start and it will eventually trickle down into their production cars......I HOPE!!!
The crate motor stuff really bears no significance to Ford's production line up besides the "Cammer" motor. I'd love to see Ford bump the displacement of the Mod motors. Build a 5.0 modular engine to replace the 4.6 and use it in the GT. A improved 4V head with VVT on BOTH the intake/exhaust would be great. Add direct injection and you've got a world class engine with modern technology. I would think that 375 crank hp out of this setup would be easily achievable and the kicker would be that this engine would be efficient and emissions friendly. A 6.0L engine with the same technology to replace the 5.4 pumping out 450ish crank hp would be great. An N/A motor would have shaved 175+ lbs off of the GT500 had Ford chosen that route.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 03:31 PM
  #65  
rrobello's Avatar
TMS West Coast Correspondent
 
Joined: October 14, 2004
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by max2000jp
The crate motor stuff really bears no significance to Ford's production line up besides the "Cammer" motor. I'd love to see Ford bump the displacement of the Mod motors. Build a 5.0 modular engine to replace the 4.6 and use it in the GT. A improved 4V head with VVT on BOTH the intake/exhaust would be great. Add direct injection and you've got a world class engine with modern technology. I would think that 375 crank hp out of this setup would be easily achievable and the kicker would be that this engine would be efficient and emissions friendly. A 6.0L engine with the same technology to replace the 5.4 pumping out 450ish crank hp would be great. An N/A motor would have shaved 175+ lbs off of the GT500 had Ford chosen that route.
that would be great, Ive always wanted Ford to get in the ring with Chevy and create motor like they do with the vettes, we need a large displacement big HP NA motor in a Ford car.

How about taking that 6.0 you were talking about and still adding the blower? HELLZ YA!
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 05:08 PM
  #66  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by rrobello
...I disagree, I think they are willing to let quality slide a bit to save some cash and purchase vehicles based on the value of the overall package; cost vs quality.
How's that been workin' out for Ford so far...? Oh, yeah, that's right, they lost money again this quarter.

Originally Posted by rrobello
A perfect example of this (since we are now discussing the GTR) is the 350Z and the G35 when they first came into the US market, the Infiniti offered more luxury, nicer interior, slightly more performance, all around better quality and IMO better looks, but at a higher cost. And even though this wasnt a huge price difference, people were not willing to pay it (for the most part) as they saw they werent getting a good value for the extra money they were spending and not getting the extra quality or performance. As a result the 350Z has completely outsold the G35 and has been the one to get the upgrades and is now the more powerful, better performing car, whereas the G35 stayed the same.
Again, you may wish to check your facts. In my neck of the woods, G35s and 350Zs are priced within 2K of one another, and G35s definitely outnumber 350Zs, primarily because the G35 offers the advantage of a rear seat. And I have been told by dealers here that the G35 most definitely is outselling the 350Z for those aforementioned reasons: anyone spending that kind of money, can easily pony up the extra couple of bills for the G35.

But if you have some North American stats that prove me wrong, I'd love to read them.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 07:46 PM
  #67  
hi5.0's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Originally Posted by max2000jp
You can add Mopar to the list too in regards to playing catch up. The fact of the matter is that Ford is playing catch up in engine development period. We are being outgunned by DCX and GM in the HP wars.
It seems like its been that way for the longest time. I don't think anyone here doubts Ford's ability to make a high-output NA (V8) motor - only Ford seems to doubt itself (after listening to the beancounters?). Maybe Ford should team up with Yamaha again for a 4.6 "SHO V8" or pirate Volvo's V8...

And BC, on Oahu the "G" is definitely more numerous than the "Z". I think the buyers here definitely don't mind the price difference. The looks probably play a big part in that too.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 08:08 PM
  #68  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by hi5.0
It seems like its been that way for the longest time. I don't think anyone here doubts Ford's ability to make a high-output NA (V8) motor - only Ford seems to doubt itself (after listening to the beancounters?). Maybe Ford should team up with Yamaha again for a 4.6 "SHO V8" or pirate Volvo's V8...

And BC, on Oahu the "G" is definitely more numerous than the "Z". I think the buyers here definitely don't mind the price difference. The looks probably play a big part in that too.
Yeah, at some point practicallity factors into the equation - and the "G" is much more practical than the "Z" for a very minor price difference. I mean, the "Z" doesn't even have a glove box (unless you like reaching awkwardly behind the passenger seat).
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 08:47 PM
  #69  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by 427sohc
Porsche on their GT3 makes 415 hp out of 3.6L (220 cid). That's 1.9hp per cubic inch and it didn't mention direct injection
The N/A porsche motor utilizes a 12:1 compression ratio and IIRC the coolant passages on each and every one of these engines are mapped out in an effort to find imperfections which would inhibit the cooling system and prevent the engine from utilizing that 12:1 compression ratio. Also if IIRC each full point of compression is worth a 4% increase in power. However sounds pretty pricey to me.

You have to wonder what the total technology picture is for the GT3 motor and how mcuh did it cost to implement?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 11:06 PM
  #71  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by hi5.0
It seems like its been that way for the longest time. I don't think anyone here doubts Ford's ability to make a high-output NA (V8) motor - only Ford seems to doubt itself (after listening to the beancounters?). Maybe Ford should team up with Yamaha again for a 4.6 "SHO V8" or pirate Volvo's V8...

And BC, on Oahu the "G" is definitely more numerous than the "Z". I think the buyers here definitely don't mind the price difference. The looks probably play a big part in that too.
Ford has engineers from Aston Martin and Jaguar that they could tap for resources. I don't understand why there isn't more sharing of technology.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 03:27 AM
  #72  
rrobello's Avatar
TMS West Coast Correspondent
 
Joined: October 14, 2004
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
How's that been workin' out for Ford so far...? Oh, yeah, that's right, they lost money again this quarter.
Like I already said, I agree with you it hasnt been working for Ford but it isnt because people arent wanting a value on a car, they do and are willing to give up a little bit of quality for a larger savings than what they are losing in quality, but like I mentioned if the savings doesnt exceed the loss in quality then they will not purchase the vehicle or if the gain in quality of a superior product exceeds the additional cost then they will buy the more expensive one (in plain English so maybe you can understand this time: if BMW makes a similar car that is superior to a Ford but the the superiority of that car doesnt justify the additional 35-40K for it then people wont buy it, but if BMW were to build the same car and compare it to the same Ford but this time the price difference was less then 20K then more people might be apt to spending more money on the BMW. Did you follow the logic this time around?) The reason Ford is losing money is because they arent creating this value purchase with many of their cars, and unfortunately for them the Mustang isnt their only car on the market, the rest of their line is falling short in this value area and thus people are spending more on a better quality vehicle elsewhere because that is the value purchase.

Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
Again, you may wish to check your facts. In my neck of the woods, G35s and 350Zs are priced within 2K of one another, and G35s definitely outnumber 350Zs, primarily because the G35 offers the advantage of a rear seat. And I have been told by dealers here that the G35 most definitely is outselling the 350Z for those aforementioned reasons: anyone spending that kind of money, can easily pony up the extra couple of bills for the G35.
First, to get this out of the way, I never said the price difference was huge, in fact I said that it wasnt and simply stated that the G35 was a higher price, whether or not this price was $1 or $100,000 more it was still higher than the 350Z and that is what I said. Also that the small increase in quality between the two cars didnt justify the small increase in cost so more people bought the 350Z. As for necks of woods, this entire thread we have been talking about the USA market not the Canadian one, so your neck of the woods doesnt count here. If more people are buying G35s in Canada then they are the 350Z great for them, but that has no bearing on what we've been talking about which is the USA market. As for my neck of the woods, which is in the USA BTW, I do live in a very wealthy part of the country where people do have the money to spend on more expensive cars and do so all the time, however 350Zs run a muck here and I can't remember the last time I saw a G35 on the road. Also if the G35 was in such high demand how come they havent updated that car yet, or come out with several specialty versions of the car, like they have with the 350Z? Its because the 350Z is the more popular car and so they focus their attention where they are more likely to make more money.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 02:01 PM
  #73  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by rrobello
As for necks of woods, this entire thread we have been talking about the USA market not the Canadian one, so your neck of the woods doesnt count here. If more people are buying G35s in Canada then they are the 350Z great for them, but that has no bearing on what we've been talking about which is the USA market. As for my neck of the woods, which is in the USA BTW, I do live in a very wealthy part of the country where people do have the money to spend on more expensive cars and do so all the time, however 350Zs run a muck here and I can't remember the last time I saw a G35 on the road.
No, YOU have been talking about just the USA market, so don't put words in the mouths of others. I asked you to provide facts and sources...not rhetoric. Prove to me that the 350Z is outselling the G35 NORTH AMERICA WIDE and I will humbly accept those statistics. Or you could just wave your flag some more and dodge the request.

Originally Posted by rrobello
Also if the G35 was in such high demand how come they havent updated that car yet, or come out with several specialty versions of the car, like they have with the 350Z? Its because the 350Z is the more popular car and so they focus their attention where they are more likely to make more money.
Wow, are all your facts this shoddy? Maybe if you're going to post all these long missives about what's REALLY going on in the automobile world, you should come back after you've learned how to use Google...seriously. You're as out of touch with your Infiniti info as you were about the info on the Nissan GT-R.

Infiniti HAVE updated the G35 (both the sedan and the coupe). The new sedan comes out in a couple of months as an '07...the coupe in '08.

And please don't give me any BS now about how, "that's not what you meant," or, "you meant why hasn't it come out BEFORE now."

Your game is getting old. I can accept when I'm wrong. Can you...?
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 04:38 PM
  #74  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
Not the best layout, but here are sales figures for Nissan through May 2006 . . .

http://www.forbes.com/businesswire/f...1005761r1.html

NISSAN DIVISION SALES Monthly May May DSR CYTD CYTD CYTD DSR 2006 2005 % Change
350Z 2,809 2,588 4.2 12,653 12,065 4.9
G35 Coupe 1,975 2,236 -15.2 8,764 10,873 -19.4

Also . .

http://g-owners.com/article_read.asp?id=8

I can't find a similar chart for the 350z . . . but I may keep trying.

And yes I know we've gone 'Off Topic', but there has been some descent discussion so I don't mind if you don't.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #75  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by Evil_Capri
Not the best layout, but here are sales figures for Nissan through May 2006 . . .

http://www.forbes.com/businesswire/f...1005761r1.html

NISSAN DIVISION SALES Monthly May May DSR CYTD CYTD CYTD DSR 2006 2005 % Change
350Z 2,809 2,588 4.2 12,653 12,065 4.9
G35 Coupe 1,975 2,236 -15.2 8,764 10,873 -19.4

Also . .

http://g-owners.com/article_read.asp?id=8

I can't find a similar chart for the 350z . . . but I may keep trying.

And yes I know we've gone 'Off Topic', but there has been some descent discussion so I don't mind if you don't.
OK, so in the United States the 350Z outsells the G35 Coupe by a significant margin. I stand corrected. However, I can say with authority that here in Canada's third largest metropolitan center, that G35's definitely outsell 350Zs.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 05:04 PM
  #76  
05fordgt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 19, 2004
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 2
From: Phoenixville, PA
I'm enjoying the show, between rrobello and BC.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 05:21 PM
  #77  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by 05fordgt
I'm enjoying the show, between rrobello and BC.
More like a massacre.

Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 05:33 PM
  #78  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
OK, so in the United States the 350Z outsells the G35 Coupe by a significant margin. I stand corrected. However, I can say with authority that here in Canada's third largest metropolitan center, that G35's definitely outsell 350Zs.
You were absolutely positive the G35 outsold the 350Z in the states but we all know how that one turned out...

Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 05:59 PM
  #79  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by TomServo92
You were absolutely positive the G35 outsold the 350Z in the states but we all know how that one turned out...
Never actually said that. What I said was: In my neck of the woods, G35s and 350Zs are priced within 2K of one another, and G35s definitely outnumber 350Zs...And I have been told by dealers here that the G35 most definitely is outselling the 350Z...

Again, I only SPECIFIED my region...though I will admit now that I SUSPECTED it was North America-wide. It appears it is not.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 06:08 PM
  #80  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
Never actually said that. What I said was: In my neck of the woods, G35s and 350Zs are priced within 2K of one another, and G35s definitely outnumber 350Zs...And I have been told by dealers here that the G35 most definitely is outselling the 350Z...

Again, I only SPECIFIED my region...though I will admit now that I SUSPECTED it was North America-wide. It appears it is not.
I was yanking your chain BC. Have a Molsen and relax...

Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 PM.