2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

WMS 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 dyno results!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5/17/10 | 09:09 AM
  #1  
JJ@WMS's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 9, 2010
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
WMS 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 dyno results!!!

After a 20 minute roadtest the WMS 2011 5.0 GT was strapped down to the dyno and made 3 back to back to back dyno pulls with 2 minutes in between each pull. 3:73 gears and dyno'd in 5th.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMUyrUyuQOU

Right in line with what everyone else that uses a dynojet is getting for numbers. I am very impressed with this engine combination and will be doing more to it over the next couple of weeks.

JJ
Attached Thumbnails WMS 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 dyno results!!!-2011-gt-sae.jpg   WMS 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 dyno results!!!-2011-gt-std.jpg  
Old 5/17/10 | 09:13 AM
  #2  
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2008
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
Great! Keep us posted and updated with each mod you do.
Old 5/17/10 | 09:18 AM
  #3  
fdjizm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 2
383, nice numbers! these cars have little drivetrain loss
Old 5/17/10 | 09:34 AM
  #4  
Stinger1982's Avatar
I am Shauny Clause
MOTM July 2010 Winner
 
Joined: November 25, 2009
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
this are right on with the #'s my car made.
things are consistant
Old 5/17/10 | 09:41 AM
  #5  
MuddyLX's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 19, 2010
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Thank you for posting your dyno graphs. Can't wait to see what it becomes!
Old 5/17/10 | 09:42 AM
  #6  
todd03blown's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2009
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: South
awesome...all the cars so far have been very close to each other!!
Old 5/17/10 | 10:49 AM
  #7  
Sax1031's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 28, 2010
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
373rwhp is not bad at all.
Old 5/17/10 | 10:57 AM
  #8  
fdjizm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Sax1031
373rwhp is not bad at all.
Second sheet shows a 383
Old 5/17/10 | 11:01 AM
  #9  
Sax1031's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 28, 2010
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by fdjizm
Second sheet shows a 383
STD numbers are almost higher than SAE numbers.

I really only concern myself with SAE numbers as they are kind of the guideline and nearly everyone goes by them.
Old 5/17/10 | 11:04 AM
  #10  
DontShoot's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 28, 2009
Posts: 202
Likes: 1
From: Coopersburg, PA
Originally Posted by fdjizm
Second sheet shows a 383
Yea, about that... what changed between Sheet One and Sheet Two?

10hp/10tq difference between sheets, just about across the boards.

NM. Didn't see the upper right corner
Old 5/17/10 | 11:23 AM
  #11  
Dave07997S's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DontShoot
Yea, about that... what changed between Sheet One and Sheet Two?

10hp/10tq difference between sheets, just about across the boards.

NM. Didn't see the upper right corner
See above..SAE numbers are what you want to look at.

Dave
Old 5/17/10 | 11:50 AM
  #12  
BLKCLOUD's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 29, 2010
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
STD numbers are ALWAYS higher than SAE, simply because the formula "corrects" to a denser atmosphere.

Nice numbers. Noted the 3.73 gears, which should show very slightly less power at the wheels than a 3.31 car. With the exception of that first 395 RWHP report from Edmunds, the cars seem to be very, very consistent in their power delivery.
Old 5/17/10 | 11:52 AM
  #13  
Sax1031's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 28, 2010
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BLKCLOUD
STD numbers are ALWAYS higher than SAE, simply because the formula "corrects" to a denser atmosphere.

Nice numbers. Noted the 3.73 gears, which should show very slightly less power at the wheels than a 3.31 car. With the exception of that first 395 RWHP report from Edmunds, the cars seem to be very, very consistent in their power delivery.
I was about to say that also.

Shorter gears will read less on a dyno.
Old 5/17/10 | 12:06 PM
  #14  
06GT's Avatar
 
Joined: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 6
lookin good man...
Old 5/17/10 | 12:40 PM
  #15  
BLKCLOUD's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 29, 2010
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
I would like to make one (picky) request of JJ....please use RPM vice MPH in the graph.

Thanks!
Bob
Old 5/17/10 | 12:47 PM
  #16  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Ford delivered
Old 5/17/10 | 12:58 PM
  #17  
JJ@WMS's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 9, 2010
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BLKCLOUD
I would like to make one (picky) request of JJ....please use RPM vice MPH in the graph.

Thanks!
Bob

You asked for it, you get it.

JJ
Attached Thumbnails WMS 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 dyno results!!!-2011-gt-rpm.jpg  
Old 5/17/10 | 01:02 PM
  #18  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
JJ you are quickly becoming one of the more popular tuners on here
Old 5/17/10 | 01:02 PM
  #19  
The Reverend's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 28, 2006
Posts: 970
Likes: 0
I wonder what a intake manifold with delete plates would look like.
Old 5/17/10 | 01:04 PM
  #20  
t-ray's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 26, 2010
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: bham al
Thanks for posting the RPM plot.

Have you made any pulls in 4th? I don't care that the absolute numbers say, but I would like to see what happens after peak HP without the speed governor kicking in.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 AM.