Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

Which tire size would actually hook up better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2/14/10, 02:23 PM
  #1  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
elvism's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 13, 2004
Location: jersey
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Which tire size would actually hook up better?

the 235/50/18 or the 245/45/19 ? or are they pretty much the same?
Old 2/14/10, 04:21 PM
  #2  
Legacy TMS Member
 
orange3.9stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 20, 2004
Location: N.E. Wisconsin
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
The 245 is technically 10 mm wider than the 235, however this is section width so not neccesarily 10 mm more tread width.

Depends on the tires too ...
18" are Pirelli P Zeros I believe, I'm not familiar with what Ford is using for 19".

Doug
Old 2/14/10, 04:56 PM
  #3  
Cobra Member
 
RandyW's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 23, 2009
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 1,312
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If the 2011 is like the 2010, the 18" and 19" will both be Pirelli P Zero Nero All Season, except for the Brembo package which will get summer-only 19" tires. If a person's highest priority is drag racing they will probably want to buy an entirely different tire.
Old 2/14/10, 05:04 PM
  #4  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Depends, on what the actual diameter of the tire is?

Now for the tire wierdness - in a static state the total area of the contact patch is no larger or smaller despite the difference in size. However if the tire is both wider and taller then there is the possibility that the tire will deform significantly enough in a dynamic state that it will apply additional rubber to the ground.

If the tires are the exact same diameter then its a wash and the 245/45R19 is only of real benefit in lateral acceleration (or perhaps at a disadvantage since the sidewall is shorter and less compliant).

But thats justg looking at it from a tire size standpoint, there still is the matter of how much actual rubber hits the road (based on the tread design and internal construction) and how hard or soft the compound is
Old 2/14/10, 05:16 PM
  #5  
Cobra R Member
 
2010MustangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the thicker the tire the better. It's kinda splittin hairs, but the 19's on paper offer the best.

If you're willing to go aftermarket there are thicker outputs that can work. Keep the fronts the same at 245/45/19 and you can go 275/40/19 in the rear

Check out http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCal...?action=submit to see if it's safe or not.

But yea, wider is better! (but within the limits of course)

Last edited by 2010MustangGT; 2/14/10 at 05:23 PM.
Old 2/14/10, 05:21 PM
  #6  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
elvism's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 13, 2004
Location: jersey
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by orange3.9stang
The 245 is technically 10 mm wider than the 235, however this is section width so not neccesarily 10 mm more tread width.

Depends on the tires too ...
18" are Pirelli P Zeros I believe, I'm not familiar with what Ford is using for 19".

Doug
both are the same brand --Pirelli P Zeros that Ford installs to there stang..i would handling and hooking up from a complete stop.
Old 2/14/10, 05:29 PM
  #7  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 2010MustangGT
But yea, wider is better! (but within the limits of course)
Keep in mind most of the supercars are mid engine. They needed those wider rear tires for handling purposes - not launching.
And while a wider tire on a Mustang would help on launch, at some point doesn't the increased friction slow you in the quarter mile?
Old 2/14/10, 05:54 PM
  #8  
Cobra R Member
 
2010MustangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Keep in mind most of the supercars are mid engine. They needed those wider rear tires for handling purposes - not launching.
And while a wider tire on a Mustang would help on launch, at some point doesn't the increased friction slow you in the quarter mile?
wheel spin is wheel spin... I would think that they don't cause decrease in 1/4 mile. These front engines blaze the 1/4. Granted they crank out outrageous hp/tq. But still... I don't think front/mid/rear engine layout matter in wheel spin. Nor are they special cases for handling as many front engine supercars have bigger tires than mid engine super cars.

Front engines:
The Mercedes Sl65 AMG: 285/30/19
The corvette ZR1: 335/25/20
Aston Martin DBS: 295/30/20
Dodge Viper: 345/30/19
gt500: 285/35/19

Rear/mid mount:
Ferrari F430: 285/35/19
Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4: 295/30/19
Porsche 911 GT3: 305/30/19

That old Countach is a rare example of outrageous...
Old 2/15/10, 06:08 AM
  #9  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2006
Location: In Boredom
Posts: 15,821
Received 781 Likes on 570 Posts
the difference between the two is 0.4 in width.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
14BlackGT
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
6
8/26/15 12:33 PM
forceflow2
'10-14 Interior and Audio
0
8/4/15 08:02 PM
JonathonK
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
1
7/27/15 07:35 PM



Quick Reply: Which tire size would actually hook up better?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.