2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Those that have them: 3.55 or 3.73 for new GT?

Old Feb 22, 2011 | 12:40 PM
  #21  
wonger's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 21, 2011
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
I really like the relaxed, idle feeling when cruising down the highway at 70 or more. I had an '07 Shelby that was great at that, but I felt it could've benefited from 3.55 or so just because 1st gear was so tall it had plenty of clutch action required to make it smooth when pulling away from a light. Anybody know if 1st is just as tall in this GT as the '07 Shelby w/ 3.31?

That's really all I want out of my new GT is a wee bit easier when driving off the line in normal driving, but still retain the relaxed feeling. i.e. having cake and full belly and frosting on your face.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 12:45 PM
  #22  
Lancel's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2010
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 99mstng
Can anyone comment as to what the rpm differences are in 6th at 70mph with 3.73 vs 3.55? I am having the same debate and wonder how big of a MPG factor it really is.

I get everyone who says, who cares its a mustang don't buy it if you want good mileage, but it's still worth debating if it's a daily driver as mine will be.
I keep the top speed of my Mustang in each gear written in my phone on a note somewhere for just these reasons. Some basic math and I can get the top speeds with the other gears for the most part, but keep in mind I assume 19" wheels and a Manual Transmission. Automatic has different gearing, and the wheels, obviously, would change these numbers too.

3.73s spin the engine at 2112 RPM at 70 MPH.
3.55s spin the engine at 2010 RPM at 70 MPH.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 03:08 PM
  #23  
Bert's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 25, 2010
Posts: 3,971
Likes: 1,663
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by 99mstng
Can anyone comment as to what the rpm differences are in 6th at 70mph with 3.73 vs 3.55?
see this sticky:
https://themustangsource.com/f726/20...dsheet-483731/

the difference in gear ratio translates directly to RPM at the same speed which pretty much translates directly to MPG at that same speed --

3.31 to 3.73 is roughly 13% difference
3.55 to 3.73 is roughly 5% difference
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 04:22 PM
  #24  
falhulk's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 14, 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Bert
see this sticky:
https://themustangsource.com/f726/20...dsheet-483731/

the difference in gear ratio translates directly to RPM at the same speed which pretty much translates directly to MPG at that same speed --

3.31 to 3.73 is roughly 13% difference
3.55 to 3.73 is roughly 5% difference
Going with that logic its a little over 1mpg and 100rpm diffrent. I would not even notice that.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 08:29 PM
  #25  
treygil's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: March 17, 2010
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
I test drove the cars with both 3.73 and 3.55 in that order. The 3.73 seemed a bit too much, the 3.55 seemed not quite enough.....so I went with the 3.73!

Couldn't be happier with my choice and I figure that is worth the extra $3 bucks per fill up (that is about all the difference I think it would be).
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 10:14 PM
  #26  
holdover's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 21, 2011
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by falhulk
I dont understand this? 1900rpms at 60 is a bit ,uch for what you paid for? What does one have to do with the other. 1900 is not particularly high either. The rpm diffrence between 3.55's and 3.73's is NOT that great.
If I wanted real street speed out of a ford I would buy the boss and put 4.56 gears in it or a shelby. I am buying this as a cruiser, some interstate driving some back road, no plans for drag racing or track time. , I already have another a car to play with. I feel that 1900RPM at 60 is not necessary for my application, and 3.55 would do nicely, it has nothing to do with mileage, I expect this 2012 to stay in my family for the next 30yrs along with my '65 & '67. One nice feature about these Mustangs is that you can order them pretty much how you want them. I would really like the 5.4 without having to buy the Shelby, and would be willing to pay a bit more for that option, but not what they are asking
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2011 | 06:08 AM
  #27  
stillkickin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: April 9, 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
OK, here's another question. (I'm still on the fence but I did order the 3.73. I can change that within 1 -2 weeks says the dealer.)

At highway speeds during cruise, let's say 70 mph, is the 3.55 noticeably quieter than the 3.73?

And I am really wondering if the 3.55 is a better DD setup and might actually be easier to hook up consistently for a non-racer.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2011 | 06:19 AM
  #28  
erickburke's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2007
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Smyrna, Ga
Originally Posted by StGry11
Love my 3.73 setup. Wouldn't cry if I had gone with 3.55s though.
This pretty much sums it up for me too!
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2011 | 07:28 AM
  #29  
Timeless's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 10, 2010
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by stillkickin
OK, here's another question. (I'm still on the fence but I did order the 3.73. I can change that within 1 -2 weeks says the dealer.)

At highway speeds during cruise, let's say 70 mph, is the 3.55 noticeably quieter than the 3.73?

And I am really wondering if the 3.55 is a better DD setup and might actually be easier to hook up consistently for a non-racer.
I do not think the 200 RPM difference at that speed will be any quieter unless you go with aftermarket exhaust that has drone.

I have the GT500 mufflers and they are perfect...the Roush ones might be a bit much depending on your taste.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2011 | 07:40 AM
  #30  
Five Oh Brian's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: November 14, 2007
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 8
From: Pacific NW USA
I went with 3.73's for my '11 GT. However, more gear is always better, IMHO. My '07 GT had 4.10's, my '03 Mach 1 had 4.30's, my '93 5.0L had 4.10's, my '89 5.0L had 3.73's, and my '68 GTO had 3.90's. My motto has always been: don't fear the gear!
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2011 | 07:46 AM
  #31  
postalworker's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: March 21, 2007
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: western mass
At 70, the 3.73's are at around 2100-2150 rpms.........
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2011 | 09:24 AM
  #32  
Ninjak's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2009
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Not a 2011 but I run a 08 S/C with 3:73. Came from a 3:31. I at first thought hmm..it does not seem a whole lot different...until I had to hit it one time. Yeah....3:73 are great !
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2011 | 11:55 AM
  #33  
jeff s's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 4, 2010
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: UAE
If you're planning on doing some N/A mods, I recommend the 3.73 or steeper aftermarket ratios. With the heads, cams, and intakes coming out, the rev range keeps extending (sounds like 7800 is the ceiling so far).

I have a stock '11 with 3.73s and hardly use 6th gear. If 4.10's were an option, I would have taken those. I'm used to oldschool stick cars without OD though... In my mind, a 7000 rpm engine turning 3000 or so on the freeway is nothing; these 5.0s can do that and more all day.

When the '11s first came out there was a lot of talk about the best gear for dragstrip times. 3.31s or 3.55s were said to be the ticket... on a factory stock car... truth is, most people interested in dragstrip performance don't leave their cars stock! 3.73s will always pull harder around town too.

Don't fear the gear!

Just thought I would enter the hotrodded Mustang argument into the mix!
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2011 | 01:11 PM
  #34  
Tyrrell-Ford P34's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 23, 2010
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Va. Beach, Va.
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by StGry11
Love my 3.73 setup. Wouldn't cry if I had gone with 3.55s though.
+1

Took a little bit of time to adjust when I first got the car, but now I couldn't imagine ever using any other ratio...
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 02:06 PM
  #35  
stillkickin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: April 9, 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
Thanks for all the input. Looks like the increased rpm's with the 3.73 rear are pretty minor at higway speeds unless I am going waaay over the speed limit.

Ordered the 2012 a couple weeks ago and will just stick with my original specs: Ingot Silver w/charcoal int, Premium 400A, Brembo, HIDs & Security, 3.73, Tape delete, Spoiler delete, Stainless billet grille.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 02:13 PM
  #36  
jokerstars's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 15, 2010
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
From: DC Metro Area
I really regret not getting 3.73's.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 10:00 AM
  #37  
wonger's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 21, 2011
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Do you have 3.31? I can't imagine there being a huge difference between the two. I'm thinking of going with 3.55 for my order today.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 10:52 AM
  #38  
i3arracuda's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 4, 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Roxboro, NC
I have 3.55's in mine and have no complaints. I've never driven a 3.73 car. Check the spreadsheet that is stickied at the top of this forum (M6 gearing spreadsheet). This will give you all the information you need to know. Test drive both ratios back to back if you need to.

If fuel mileage is a concern, stick with the 3.31's. The best I've gotten is 22 MPG combined. I know it can do better, but I'm not giving it a chance. If I wanted a fuel miser I would have bought a Fiesta.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 06:47 PM
  #39  
wonger's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 21, 2011
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
I ended up picking 3.55 for my order today. I've only driven the 3.73's on this and thought it was just barely a bit much. The 3.31 I had on the '07 Shelby were just a bit tall. Figured this should be just right for my daily driver.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 08:40 PM
  #40  
SteelTownStang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: July 1, 2006
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 1
3.73
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:16 PM.