View Poll Results: Should there be another body variation?
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll
Should there be another body variation?
#1
Should there be another body variation?
Ever since I saw the '05 vert, I fell in love with the shape...That got me thinking...Maybe since the "fastback" has been revived, Ford might come back with the "hardtop" and keep the same shape as the vert...SO I guess what I'm asking, should for go ahead and offer a third style of body like the old days?
#2
I think its a good idea....
problem is if you average the last 10-15 years, the Mustang doesn't even come close to the volume of the 65-73 model run.
Unfortunatley with companies being so cost-concious, I doubt they will budget for the extra tooling for a third bodystyle on the chassis. The only way I could see that being possible, is if they build another car with a hardtop and then they can mix and match the rooflines (ie. a Mercury Cougar, or Lincold MKsomething)
problem is if you average the last 10-15 years, the Mustang doesn't even come close to the volume of the 65-73 model run.
Unfortunatley with companies being so cost-concious, I doubt they will budget for the extra tooling for a third bodystyle on the chassis. The only way I could see that being possible, is if they build another car with a hardtop and then they can mix and match the rooflines (ie. a Mercury Cougar, or Lincold MKsomething)
#5
I say they make the fastback a true fastback ala 67-73. I think a coupe would make a nice option for someone that doesn't want the long look of the F/B.
I will probably get hated for this, but this is only my experience...
Most of the ladies that I know who are into classic mustangs like the coupe, while almost all the guys I know prefer the fastback. We know that in past the largest single demographic for the mustang has been female, so a coupe may be good, but the prevailing image of the mustang still stands with images of Machs and Shelbys ala fastback, so Ford may have a justification for doing both
Sorry if I have offended.
I will probably get hated for this, but this is only my experience...
Most of the ladies that I know who are into classic mustangs like the coupe, while almost all the guys I know prefer the fastback. We know that in past the largest single demographic for the mustang has been female, so a coupe may be good, but the prevailing image of the mustang still stands with images of Machs and Shelbys ala fastback, so Ford may have a justification for doing both
Sorry if I have offended.
#8
It really wouldn't be all that hard for them to do, my only question is how would it look? I dun think a coupe style would work well with this body style, maby if the rear fenders where similar to the 64 1/2...
but then again, they could just make the verts and the coupes on the same frame, but the verts get more bracing etc, while the hardtops get a roof welded on. And the fastbacks would have nothin less than a v8, coupes and verts would be the only v6ers.
And all the Shelby's machs etc, would be fastbacks, unless of course they do a GT350, tho the later years where fastbacks...
But agin I would like to see it, and being an optimist, I will say yes!
but then again, they could just make the verts and the coupes on the same frame, but the verts get more bracing etc, while the hardtops get a roof welded on. And the fastbacks would have nothin less than a v8, coupes and verts would be the only v6ers.
And all the Shelby's machs etc, would be fastbacks, unless of course they do a GT350, tho the later years where fastbacks...
But agin I would like to see it, and being an optimist, I will say yes!
#9
well if they come out like the chops done by decipher all those ages ago... i say yes!
i wouldnt mind owning a coupe at all just make sure it has all the sam options as the "fastback" mustang and its alll gooood
i wouldnt mind owning a coupe at all just make sure it has all the sam options as the "fastback" mustang and its alll gooood
#10
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 2,293
From: Carnegie, PA
Originally Posted by jarradasay
I say they make the fastback a true fastback ala 67-73. I think a coupe would make a nice option for someone that doesn't want the long look of the F/B.
I will probably get hated for this, but this is only my experience...
Most of the ladies that I know who are into classic mustangs like the coupe, while almost all the guys I know prefer the fastback. We know that in past the largest single demographic for the mustang has been female, so a coupe may be good, but the prevailing image of the mustang still stands with images of Machs and Shelbys ala fastback, so Ford may have a justification for doing both
Sorry if I have offended.
I will probably get hated for this, but this is only my experience...
Most of the ladies that I know who are into classic mustangs like the coupe, while almost all the guys I know prefer the fastback. We know that in past the largest single demographic for the mustang has been female, so a coupe may be good, but the prevailing image of the mustang still stands with images of Machs and Shelbys ala fastback, so Ford may have a justification for doing both
Sorry if I have offended.
#13
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 2,293
From: Carnegie, PA
Originally Posted by Autotooner
I am still undecided on this... but a true hatchback would be nice...
#14
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 2,293
From: Carnegie, PA
Originally Posted by jarradasay
I did a chop of what it would look like in a F/B, but I can't seem to find the old post. If I find it, then I will post it.
#15
Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
Did you intend to say, true fastback ??? at least, that's what I hope you meant..
#16
Jason->
I suppose you are entitled to your opinion....and I respect it...but man...I really am glad those days are over....
I suppose you are entitled to your opinion....and I respect it...but man...I really am glad those days are over....
#17
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 2,293
From: Carnegie, PA
Originally Posted by Autotooner
the fastback lines? yes. Functional hatch? yes also. IMO hatches are better than the traditional trunk openings.
#18
Hatches don't sell as well here and notchbacks would have to undercut fastbacks in price to sell at all. Not worth the dev money. Concentrate on keeping the whole car competetive, leave the notchback in tis grave.
#19
Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
Well, I can agree that a hatch is better, in the sense that it provides more cargo space than a tradtional trunk opening, but on the other hand..To me, a hatch just doesn't look like a true muscle car, especially on a Mustang, the hatch kind of gives the appearance of having no back or rear deck, to the car..I don't know, guess I'm just from the old school, who grew up with the original Mustangs, from the mid 60's...Plus, one of the main reasons why Ford discontinued the hatchback model in 94, was because the chassis were considered, to be much weaker, compared to that of a traditional trunk based chassis..
#20
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 2,293
From: Carnegie, PA
Originally Posted by Autotooner
I can see what you mean, but it could look good, not all hatches have to look like a station wagon rear...