2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

SCT Performance gains 28+ HP on a 2011 Mustang with just a Tune

Old Jun 9, 2010 | 08:31 AM
  #1  
Magnamover's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: May 29, 2010
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Seneca Falls NY
SCT Performance gains 28+ HP on a 2011 Mustang with just a Tune

Taken from CMOC forum:

"SCT is popular for their high performance tunes designed to improve vehicle performance while not sacrificing reliability. Most recently, SCT Performance took over a 2011 Ford Mustang with a 5.0-liter with an automatic transmission. SCT technicians took a stock pull on their chassis dyno to get baseline specs on the Mustang.

The dyno graph showed 360.71 horsepower at the rear wheels and 326.23 ft-lbs. of torque. The high performance tune was then applied to the car’s ECU. The dyno results showed a mid-range power improvement of 28.5 horsepower and 34 ft-lbs. of torque, though resulting in 376.36 horsepower and 356.17 ft-lbs. of torque on high octane fuel at peak power. Also, the rev limit was greatly improved from factory settings by over 500rpm.

SCT took the Mustang on a test run after getting the dyno feedback. Technicians discovered improved drivability and better shifting over the stock tune, plus the lack of a speed limiter. When tested on standard 87 octane fuel, the Mustang 5.0 had a final horsepower/torque readout of approximately 373 and 350 respectively, which is barely lower than the 93 octane tune."



This will be my first purchase. I'm sure we all can use more midrange.


__________________
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 08:49 AM
  #2  
1trickpony's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Thanks for posting, do you know what the octane was stock and the octane used for the tune? I think going from 87 to 93 octane is worth close to 16 WHP on a stock car.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 09:01 AM
  #3  
RickyD's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 3, 2004
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: QC, Canada
Anything good from SCT for the 2011 GT500 ?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 11:49 AM
  #4  
Bigjohns97's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 3, 2009
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Not sure about those claims, that torque is way low on the before tune numbers.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 01:40 PM
  #5  
csledd's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 23, 2010
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Paducah, KY
Originally Posted by Bigjohns97
Not sure about those claims, that torque is way low on the before tune numbers.
They posted the dyno graph
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 01:43 PM
  #6  
Soap's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: March 25, 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Wasn't this already posted a few days ago? I know I read this someplace already...
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 02:16 PM
  #7  
Thomas S's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: April 29, 2005
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 5
I'm no math whiz but that's only just a little over 15rwhp difference...

Oh, midrange was up 28.5.

Last edited by Thomas S; Jun 9, 2010 at 02:19 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 02:20 PM
  #8  
06GT's Avatar
 
Joined: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by csledd
They posted the dyno graph
Please repost the graphs here...
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #9  
csledd's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 23, 2010
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Paducah, KY
http://www.stangtv.com/forum/sct-per...11-a-6932.html
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 02:56 PM
  #10  
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2008
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
We will see what Magnachargers results are with their auto as they are supposed to post #'s tomorrow.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 03:36 PM
  #11  
06GT's Avatar
 
Joined: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 6
Wow. Nice gains everywhere in the RPM band.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 03:48 PM
  #12  
Source's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 16, 2010
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Diablosport is working with mine at the moment, I'll let you guys know what they make.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 04:15 PM
  #13  
Dave07997S's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
The numbers were STD not SAE..

Dave
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MRGTX
2012-2013 BOSS 302
12
Aug 7, 2015 08:29 AM
Warrior316
Introductions
3
Jul 28, 2015 11:05 AM
MRGTX
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
5
Jul 21, 2015 02:08 PM
Kgilly
5.0L GT Modifications
6
Jul 9, 2015 01:47 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:04 PM.