2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Oil Life Monitor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/3/10 | 09:05 PM
  #21  
montreal ponies's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Originally Posted by laserred38
LOL jeez I asked 3 times. I don't have the patience to go download and search through a 2011 Owner's Manual. Is it that hard to answer a question around here? Or do I have to be asking where my 2011 5.0 is and post what the latest hold is.
Search the forums, it's been discussed several times.



































Old 6/3/10 | 09:09 PM
  #22  
07S197's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Man Cans
 
Joined: August 20, 2007
Posts: 4,352
Likes: 2
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by laserred38
LOL jeez I asked 3 times. I don't have the patience to go download and search through a 2011 Owner's Manual. Is it that hard to answer a question around here? Or do I have to be asking where my 2011 5.0 is and post what the latest hold is.
We are just giving you a hard time, no need to get upset.


For your convenience, your vehicle is equipped with a message center
which determines the proper oil change service interval. You should
perform the engine oil change as indicated by the instrument cluster
message center. The message center will display ENGINE OIL CHANGE
SOON or OIL CHANGE REQUIRED to indicate when an oil change is
needed. The engine oil change service needs to be completed within two
weeks or 500 miles (800 km) after the OIL CHANGE REQUIRED
message is displayed. Your oil change service interval can be up to one
year or 10,000 miles (16,000 km). Reset your Intelligent Oil Life
Monitor™ after each engine oil and filter change; refer to the
Instrument Cluster chapter.
If your message center is prematurely reset or becomes inoperative, you
should perform the oil change interval at six months 5,000 miles
(8,000 km) from your last oil change



Old 6/3/10 | 09:48 PM
  #23  
2010MustangGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 12, 2009
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by David Young
My Mustang has 408 miles on it. My oil is at 97%

I also tried to set up my 'Health Check'. It will send you a e-mail to remind you of things that need to be done to your car. Last week i tried to set it up but it told me the web site wasn't up and running yet. Has anyone else tried to set up their 'Health Check' yet?
did you register your mustang?
Old 6/3/10 | 11:30 PM
  #24  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Haha I'm not upset at all. I was merely pointing out that many topics in this section don't even get looked at unless they're about someone's order or some conspiracy theory. And if there wasn't so much garbage on the first two pages of this section, maybe the original oil change thread would still be on page 1!

Ok, carry on
Old 6/4/10 | 10:39 AM
  #25  
coffeejolts's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 3, 2009
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Oil, filters, and the frequency they should be changed can be debated all day long. There are entire websites dedicated to it. The way I understand it (commence flaming now), the only risk to changing oil too often is that you waste money.

The Motorcraft 5w20 syn-blend is pretty good stuff, and it's relatively cheap. Same goes for Motorcraft filters. I don't think the $25 for the oil change is a good place to try to save money. So yeah, I am likely changing the oil before I truly need to; but so what? It's cheap insurance.
Old 6/4/10 | 11:08 AM
  #26  
RandyW's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 23, 2009
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 2
From: NW Minnesota
I'll be going by Ford's recommendations. I know a lot of people are skeptical about the recommendations but I'm not. By recommending that you change it less frequently than really necessary, they sell fewer filters and less oil, plus open themselves up to complaints that their engines don't last as long as they should. I see no motive for them to issue recommendations for 10,000 mile intervals (depending on conditions) when the oil really needs to be changed at 3,000-5,000 miles.
Old 6/4/10 | 03:53 PM
  #27  
Gene K's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RandyW
I'll be going by Ford's recommendations. I know a lot of people are skeptical about the recommendations but I'm not. By recommending that you change it less frequently than really necessary, they sell fewer filters and less oil, plus open themselves up to complaints that their engines don't last as long as they should. I see no motive for them to issue recommendations for 10,000 mile intervals (depending on conditions) when the oil really needs to be changed at 3,000-5,000 miles.
I agree. Been using oil analysis for years on heavy equipment. If I had concerns about the IOLM I would just send off a sample for analysis to confirm its accurate.

1st OCI - 1,000 miles with Motorcraft Blend
2nd OCI - 4,000 miles with Motorcraft Blend
3rd OCI - Will be at 30% with Pennzoil Platinum
4th OCI - Will be at 0% with Pennzoil Platinum.

IOLM shows 96% at 900 miles and 39 days. Considering only about 180 miles of that are interstate and Ive bounced off the limiter a fair number of times testing to solve my clutch issue it cant be to conservative.

How can it be 96% at 39 days and 900 miles if maximum interval 365 days and 10,000 miles? Seems like it should be 89% or 91%.
It must suddenly drop to 0% at 10,000 miles or 12 months? Likely to discourage people from changing to early.
Old 6/4/10 | 07:40 PM
  #28  
3Mach1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 19, 2006
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Gene K
I agree. Been using oil analysis for years on heavy equipment. If I had concerns about the IOLM I would just send off a sample for analysis to confirm its accurate.

1st OCI - 1,000 miles with Motorcraft Blend
2nd OCI - 4,000 miles with Motorcraft Blend
3rd OCI - Will be at 30% with Pennzoil Platinum
4th OCI - Will be at 0% with Pennzoil Platinum.

IOLM shows 96% at 900 miles and 39 days. Considering only about 180 miles of that are interstate and Ive bounced off the limiter a fair number of times testing to solve my clutch issue it cant be to conservative.

How can it be 96% at 39 days and 900 miles if maximum interval 365 days and 10,000 miles? Seems like it should be 89% or 91%.
It must suddenly drop to 0% at 10,000 miles or 12 months? Likely to discourage people from changing to early.
Gene, I am wondering if this thing does not work on a linear basis? It may stay up there for the first few miles and then start dropping fast? Say from 50 percent down? I dont know. It would be something good to ask a Ford engineer.

I think you can run any synthetic down to 0 pretty easy. Ford has enough confidence in motorcraft to go that distance. Dino oil is way way better than it used to be.
Old 6/4/10 | 07:55 PM
  #29  
GRABOID's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 15, 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Originally Posted by coffeejolts
Oil, filters, and the frequency they should be changed can be debated all day long. There are entire websites dedicated to it. The way I understand it (commence flaming now), the only risk to changing oil too often is that you waste money.

The Motorcraft 5w20 syn-blend is pretty good stuff, and it's relatively cheap. Same goes for Motorcraft filters. I don't think the $25 for the oil change is a good place to try to save money. So yeah, I am likely changing the oil before I truly need to; but so what? It's cheap insurance.


Its ok your wasting less money than the people using $5+ quart synthetics

I do like the blend from Motorcraft though esp. at the price.
Old 6/4/10 | 08:30 PM
  #30  
David Young's Avatar
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
 
Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 3,377
Likes: 125
From: Clinton Tennessee
Originally Posted by 2010MustangGT
did you register your mustang?
When i try to register with my V.I.N., they tell me my car doesn't exist.
Old 6/8/10 | 12:37 AM
  #31  
Former 5.0 owner's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: January 1, 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by chevys
Nah, this thing is totally electronic. Its very complex and counts engine revs, oil temp, load, cold starts, temp, throttle position and all sorts of things. It knows if you drag racing or what ever. You get the idea. Its a very complex set of variable and places a value on each one and counts down. If your ripping on it all the time its going to be a short change. If you take a long trip it will be much slower.

Ford was using a mileage counter which is useless because no two people will drive under the same conditions. Some people will never be able to bring themselves to use this but the GM and Honda monitor have proven time and time again to be spot on. I look at it as a money saver and taking out the guess work for oil changes.
Wow, far more sophisticated than BMW which basically just does it by the amount of fuel the car uses.
Old 6/8/10 | 06:26 AM
  #32  
Bert's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 25, 2010
Posts: 3,875
Likes: 1,598
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by David Young
When i try to register with my V.I.N., they tell me my car doesn't exist.
I have been having trouble with the "sync my ride" system also . . . it did register my car, (but mine is a 2010 so maybe the 2011's aren't in the system yet) and then I ran the health check, but I never got the e-mail and the health check does not show up in the web site.

I contacted Ford via the instant chat, and the support person said they were having a problem with the web site that was supposed to be fixed by last Tuesday . . . but I haven't had a chance to try it again . . . he said it should show up after they fix the web site; but I haven't received any e-mail with the health check results; so I'm guessing I will have to do it again.

Had similar problem with the Sync software update -- I ran the update, but it did not register correctly in the web site, so I probably have to do it again.
Old 6/8/10 | 08:47 AM
  #33  
David Young's Avatar
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
 
Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 3,377
Likes: 125
From: Clinton Tennessee
I'll try it again from time to time.

As far as oil changes go, after the first three low mile oil changes i'll change mine (myself) every 3,000 miles even after i switch to full synthetic oil. I don't drive too many miles per year and it will take me on average, nine months to put 3,000 miles on my Mustang.
Old 6/8/10 | 12:18 PM
  #34  
Gene K's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by David Young
I'll try it again from time to time.

As far as oil changes go, after the first three low mile oil changes i'll change mine (myself) every 3,000 miles even after i switch to full synthetic oil. I don't drive too many miles per year and it will take me on average, nine months to put 3,000 miles on my Mustang.
Use whatever makes you feel warm and fuzzy. I might use synthetic myself for those coated buckets. Ive never heard of an issue on non-DI engines but having seen the valvetrain carnage that results when the extreme pressures from DI and the resulting shearing of the oil cause that coating to wear through they make me nervous.
Old 6/8/10 | 03:27 PM
  #35  
houtex's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 7,582
Likes: 670
From: Insane
Mobil 1 synthetic every 5K. Easy to remember, and I figure if I do it by the book, I'm good. Plus, the rotation is easier to remember. Next set at 55K, and I'll do the inspection too.

I don't rag the car, and it's driven normally, mostly, a generous mix of both city and highway. I got a place near me that takes good care of my baby's fluid change needs. Even helped me with the Royal Purple Synchromax, which they didn't have the ability to do... at first. But then they magically 'figured it out'.

Them boys are good, fast, clean, thorough, and I don't have to deal with the waste or get messy. And for the money, easy trade. Win.

Last edited by houtex; 6/8/10 at 03:29 PM.
Old 6/8/10 | 05:49 PM
  #36  
Bigjohns97's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 3, 2009
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Where are you taking your car?

Did that royal purple really help out the tranny?
Old 6/8/10 | 06:36 PM
  #37  
David Young's Avatar
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
 
Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 3,377
Likes: 125
From: Clinton Tennessee
Originally Posted by Gene K
Use whatever makes you feel warm and fuzzy. I might use synthetic myself for those coated buckets. Ive never heard of an issue on non-DI engines but having seen the valvetrain carnage that results when the extreme pressures from DI and the resulting shearing of the oil cause that coating to wear through they make me nervous.
I know the V-6 comes from the factory with a 'synthetic blend' motor oil. I thought the G.T. came with 'full synthetic' motor oil from the factory. Do they?
Old 6/10/10 | 11:55 AM
  #38  
Gene K's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by David Young
I know the V-6 comes from the factory with a 'synthetic blend' motor oil. I thought the G.T. came with 'full synthetic' motor oil from the factory. Do they?
I have been unable to find any official Ford Statement that the Mustang GT 5.0 comes with Full Synthetic.
The owners manual has the same requirements as the 3.7L. Basically any name brand 5W-20 meets Ford Specs.
Based on the valvetrain the V6 should be harder on oil than the 5.0L.

As I understand it the trans fluid is Fuchs GL-4 Premium Synthetic Ford Spec M2C200-C. If your looking for it in the USA Ford is likely to be the only game in town that is SAE. Most manufacturers dont import their version to the USA (Limited Market). Thats a 75W-90 (Gear) or 10W-40 (Motor) Rating depending on which scale the manufacturer uses.

Last edited by Gene K; 6/10/10 at 11:59 AM.
Old 6/10/10 | 12:05 PM
  #39  
3Mach1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 19, 2006
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Gene K
I have been unable to find any official Ford Statement that the Mustang GT 5.0 comes with Full Synthetic.
The owners manual has the same requirements as the 3.7L. Basically any name brand 5W-20 meets Ford Specs.
Based on the valvetrain the V6 should be harder on oil than the 5.0L.

As I understand it the trans fluid is Fuchs GL-4 Premium Synthetic Ford Spec M2C200-C. If your looking for it in the USA Ford is likely to be the only game in town that is SAE. Most manufacturers dont import their version to the USA (Limited Market). Thats a 75W-90 (Gear) or 10W-40 (Motor) Rating depending on which scale the manufacturer uses.
I was about to ask you about this Gene. Is it really worth it to run penz plat? Is not motor craft good enough? Not to start any crap but does it reallly matter??? I am with you on the synthetic thing but dang its expensive. Help me out here. Not trying to start a debate but man it gets expensive over the long haul. What is your thinking? I have done both things so I guess I am bi.

I would really liike your opinion.
Old 6/10/10 | 12:35 PM
  #40  
Gene K's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by chevys
I was about to ask you about this Gene. Is it really worth it to run penz plat? Is not motor craft good enough? Not to start any crap but does it reallly matter??? I am with you on the synthetic thing but dang its expensive. Help me out here. Not trying to start a debate but man it gets expensive over the long haul. What is your thinking? I have done both things so I guess I am bi.

I would really liike your opinion.

Most synthetics are blended with an ad pack designed to go 50-300% longer than most conventionals.
Unless you extend the drain intervals their is no advantage to Synthetic unless you have a special case like General Extreme Oil Temps (Open Track), Localized Extreme Temps (Turbo Bearings) or Shearing or Gas Dilution (Direct Injection).

Based on the design of the 5.0L and the history of the Modulars which this engine still shares some design elements with It should be pretty easy on oil so I dont think Synthetic will be called for at shorter drain intervals.

The valvetrain design of the 3.7L makes me think it will be harder on oil.

If Im going to go to go to 0% and maybe 10,000 miles on some drains in the 5.0 the Full Synthetic just makes me feel better unless I run an analysis on the Motorcraft to convince myself that its up to it.

I have a bit more faith in extended drains than many here because Im used to heavy diesels going over a million miles on 30,000 mile changes of conventional 15W-40 or 60,000 mi changes of 5W-40 Synthetic. I remember when anything over 10,000 miles was considered foolhardy and the engines only lasted 600,000 miles. That said the additive package on those oils blow away what you see in car oils for the most part.

Bottom Line for me:
Without Analysis MC 5W20 SB at 30% or PP 5W-20 FS at 0%.

Last edited by Gene K; 6/10/10 at 12:38 PM.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:21 AM.