o/r h pipe with gt500 axle back vs. roush axle back with stock H
o/r h pipe with gt500 axle back vs. roush axle back with stock H
I dont know what to do here, I love the way the gt500 axle back sounds with no resonators but its just not loud and deep enough for me. I was thinking of a lethal performance off road h pipe to bump up the sound. Or should i just keep stock H and buy roush axle backs to get more sound... I HATE the clap clap clap sound i hear with some new mustang when they are taking off. My gt500's dont do that at all. I can handle a little rasp no problem tho. I want pretty **** loud. Opinions???
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator






Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,648
Likes: 2,519
From: Carnegie, PA
After reading over the post responses regarding the Borla S-type. I'll just add by stating that on the older 2005-10 (3) valve motors, the Borla S-types have a horrible drone to them, at least through my personal experience anyhow. As for the 2011-14, 5.0 Coyote motors are concerned? I don't really have much knowledge as far as how different the design changes are when compared with the older 2005-10 (3) valve motors. My guess is due to the exhaust valve changes between the 4.6 (3) valve and Coyote 5.0 4valve, the Coyote 4v motors are far less prone to interior resonance drone over the older 4.6 (3)valve motors. It would also be safe to assume that Borla also changed the interior design of their exhaust systems when being tuned for the 5.0 Coyote 4valve motors as well. At any rate, just saying 
Edit: The post was intended to be submitted in the Looking To Change My Axle-Back Exhaust Again Thread. Anyhow, my bad lol.

Edit: The post was intended to be submitted in the Looking To Change My Axle-Back Exhaust Again Thread. Anyhow, my bad lol.
Last edited by m05fastbackGT; Jan 19, 2019 at 05:04 PM. Reason: Posted in the wrong thread
Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
After reading over the post responses regarding the Borla S-type. I'll just add by stating that on the older 2005-10 (3) valve motors, the Borla S-types have a horrible drone to them, at least through my personal experience anyhow. As for the 2011-14, 5.0 Coyote motors are concerned? I don't really have much knowledge as far as how different the design changes are when compared with the older 2005-10 (3) valve motors. My guess is due to the exhaust valve changes between the 4.6 (3) valve and Coyote 5.0 4valve, the Coyote 4v motors are far less prone to interior resonance drone over the older 4.6 (3)valve motors. It would also be safe to assume that Borla also changed the interior design of their exhaust systems when being tuned for the 5.0 Coyote 4valve motors as well. At any rate, just saying 

SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator






Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,648
Likes: 2,519
From: Carnegie, PA
Last edited by m05fastbackGT; Jan 19, 2019 at 04:32 PM.
hmmmm, really? where is that coming from? I have read just the opposite; removing the cats is supposedly worth only a couple HP . . . did you do it on your car, any chance you have a before and after dyno run? (would be great to put some facts on it)
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator






Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,648
Likes: 2,519
From: Carnegie, PA
100% spot on
No dyno runs, but I replaced my H with a 3" X. The stock H starts at 3 inch and necks down by a quarter inch or so three times and I couldn't put my thumb into the crossover, It doesn't flare back to 2 3/4' until after the resonators. I call that restrictive compared to a full three inch X or H pipe. My car sounds deep and throaty but not too loud or obnoxious.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MRGTX
2007-2009 Shelby GT500
11
Jan 2, 2024 04:30 PM
glo106
2010-2014 Mustang
16
Aug 11, 2015 08:29 AM



