Heads up for tuned 11-12 V6's
12/19/11, 09:19 AM
#1
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: September 23, 2011
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heads up for tuned 11-12 V6's
Just saw this nauseating clip... Don't take your car past its limit is the moral of the story. or get an aftermarket aluminum driveshaft and do whatever you want!
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/19/w...ails-at-135-m/
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/19/w...ails-at-135-m/
12/19/11, 12:25 PM
#6
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: July 26, 2004
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
J.C. - what a mucking foron, even I could hear the driveshaft vibration noise in the video and would have slowed down immediately.
But to Ford, what a mucking foron move to put a weaker driveshaft in the V6. I know this is a long-known issue for the V6 models, but did Ford really think that people would know to replace the driveshaft due to safety concerns if they tuned the 305 HP 3.7L V6 computer to allow a higher top speed? If this was a carry-over from the 2004-2010 V6 driveshaft, then someone at Ford should be canned for thinking that 300+ HP car owner would enjoy a 114mph speed limiter.
I just don't get it when manufacturers to this stupid bean counter crap to cars. Camaro V6 owners need not worry about this type of safety issue, or even GD Kia Optima Turbo, perfectly capable of 145mph at $25k.
But to Ford, what a mucking foron move to put a weaker driveshaft in the V6. I know this is a long-known issue for the V6 models, but did Ford really think that people would know to replace the driveshaft due to safety concerns if they tuned the 305 HP 3.7L V6 computer to allow a higher top speed? If this was a carry-over from the 2004-2010 V6 driveshaft, then someone at Ford should be canned for thinking that 300+ HP car owner would enjoy a 114mph speed limiter.
I just don't get it when manufacturers to this stupid bean counter crap to cars. Camaro V6 owners need not worry about this type of safety issue, or even GD Kia Optima Turbo, perfectly capable of 145mph at $25k.
12/19/11, 01:06 PM
#9
V6 Member
Join Date: September 25, 2009
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12/19/11, 01:22 PM
#10
Legacy TMS Member
J.C. - what a mucking foron, even I could hear the driveshaft vibration noise in the video and would have slowed down immediately.
But to Ford, what a mucking foron move to put a weaker driveshaft in the V6. I know this is a long-known issue for the V6 models, but did Ford really think that people would know to replace the driveshaft due to safety concerns if they tuned the 305 HP 3.7L V6 computer to allow a higher top speed? If this was a carry-over from the 2004-2010 V6 driveshaft, then someone at Ford should be canned for thinking that 300+ HP car owner would enjoy a 114mph speed limiter.
I just don't get it when manufacturers to this stupid bean counter crap to cars. Camaro V6 owners need not worry about this type of safety issue, or even GD Kia Optima Turbo, perfectly capable of 145mph at $25k.
But to Ford, what a mucking foron move to put a weaker driveshaft in the V6. I know this is a long-known issue for the V6 models, but did Ford really think that people would know to replace the driveshaft due to safety concerns if they tuned the 305 HP 3.7L V6 computer to allow a higher top speed? If this was a carry-over from the 2004-2010 V6 driveshaft, then someone at Ford should be canned for thinking that 300+ HP car owner would enjoy a 114mph speed limiter.
I just don't get it when manufacturers to this stupid bean counter crap to cars. Camaro V6 owners need not worry about this type of safety issue, or even GD Kia Optima Turbo, perfectly capable of 145mph at $25k.
But it is odd that the V6 Camaro does 146, 1 MPH faster than the Mustang GT is limited to.
12/19/11, 01:35 PM
#11
Bear Eats King...
Bear ****s Bone
Bear ****s Bone
Join Date: September 5, 2011
Location: Cleburne, Tx
Posts: 5,302
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I saw a 600hp procharged v6 at the car meet last Saturday. He was running ethanol. That was one bad *** stang! 160mph? He pushes past that all the time! 
12/19/11, 03:00 PM
#14
Cobra Member
Does one failure mean that it is a chronic problem? Surely this guy was not the first one to remove the speed governor on a 2011-12 V6 Mustang and go over 130 with it. Do we know that the custom tune was the only change he made? I don't want this to be another runaway thread were one person experiences a mechanical failure and everyone starts running in circles yelling that the sky is falling.
LEwis26, I think the governor on the GT is set at 146 MPH, not 155.
LEwis26, I think the governor on the GT is set at 146 MPH, not 155.
12/19/11, 03:03 PM
#15
Bear Eats King...
Bear ****s Bone
Bear ****s Bone
Join Date: September 5, 2011
Location: Cleburne, Tx
Posts: 5,302
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by RandyW
Does one failure mean that it is a chronic problem? Surely this guy was not the first one to remove the speed governor on a 2011-12 V6 Mustang and go over 130 with it. Do we know that the custom tune was the only change he made? I don't want this to be another runaway thread were one person experiences a mechanical failure and everyone starts running in circles yelling that the sky is falling.
LEwis26, I think the governor on the GT is set at 146 MPH, not 155.
LEwis26, I think the governor on the GT is set at 146 MPH, not 155.
12/19/11, 03:30 PM
#18
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: January 15, 2005
Location: So. FL
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Our V6's have the 3.31 rear axle from the factory, so perhaps they get a two-piece DS like the GTs. I need to check if our V6 has a one-piece, because I don't know what it has.
12/19/11, 06:52 PM
#20
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: Clinton Tennessee
Posts: 3,377
Received 124 Likes
on
100 Posts
My Dad gave me enough Christmas money to buy it
