Future Mustang Engines: 350-hp V6, I-4

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

1/12/09, 05:50 PM

#21

Enfynet

BS Like That

Join Date: August 19, 2004

Location: Cleveland

Posts: 2,020

Likes: 0

Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by classix_stang289

maybe FWD I4 mustang weighing in about 3100-3200lbs?

I think you made a typo there... FWD =/= Mustang... we went over this in the late 80's

Reply Like

1/12/09, 05:54 PM

#22

Blue Notch

...Like Son

Join Date: December 5, 2006

Location: Trapped in Minnesota

Posts: 31,619

Likes: 0

Received 70 Likes on 66 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by classix_stang289

maybe FWD I4 mustang weighing in about 3100-3200lbs?

I'd kill myself.

Reply Like

1/12/09, 06:19 PM

#23

tacbear

Mach 1 Member

Join Date: July 22, 2005

Posts: 800

Likes: 0

Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

The Mustang I4 will be either 2.0L or 2.5 Turbo and at least 260 hp!

Reply Like

1/12/09, 07:27 PM

#24

Moosetang

Tasca Super Boss 429 Member

Join Date: February 1, 2004

Posts: 3,751

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by classix_stang289

maybe FWD I4 mustang weighing in about 3100-3200lbs?

won't be FWD....that would make no sense.

Reply Like

1/12/09, 07:49 PM

#25

Clino

Mach 1 Member

Join Date: May 16, 2008

Location: Vancouver

Posts: 571

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Let's face it, any change is good change at this point. We currently have a 210hp clunker of a V6 and a modest V8 that is quickly becoming obsolete.

Personally, I would just be happy with the 265hp 3.5 and a 390hp 5.0, but the ecoboost would be pretty impressive if we see it in a regular model and not just in a SE

Reply Like

1/12/09, 08:17 PM

#26

mobster

Mach 1 Member

Join Date: March 11, 2004

Posts: 756

Likes: 0

Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by classix_stang289

maybe FWD I4 mustang weighing in about 3100-3200lbs?

Thats called a Probe...

Reply Like

1/12/09, 09:04 PM

#27

slowjoe24

Shelby GT350 Member

Join Date: October 20, 2004

Posts: 2,492

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

350hp V6 = Some Happy V6 Folks

Reply Like

1/13/09, 04:10 PM

#28

classix_stang289

Cobra Member

Join Date: February 10, 2005

Location: New Jersey

Posts: 1,064

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Enfynet

I think you made a typo there... FWD =/= Mustang... we went over this in the late 80's

no, no typo. laugh if you want but it was only a thought!

Reply Like

1/13/09, 04:11 PM

#29

classix_stang289

Cobra Member

Join Date: February 10, 2005

Location: New Jersey

Posts: 1,064

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moosetang

won't be FWD....that would make no sense.

well ford doesnt make much sense at times.
kinda thinking outside the box so to say.

Reply Like

1/13/09, 05:15 PM

#30

CurtisH

V6 Member

Join Date: October 12, 2004

Posts: 67

Likes: 3

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by SVTJayC

Quote:

They are rated for a 150,000-mile, 10-year life.

Um...and then what?

I believe 150,000 miles is Ford's durability standard for all of their gas engines.

Reply Like

1/13/09, 05:28 PM

#31

GT40 2

Mach 1 Member

Join Date: February 1, 2004

Posts: 940

Likes: 0

Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

A new four cylinder Mustang would be a whole lot faster than mine.

Reply Like

1/13/09, 07:40 PM

#32

97svtgoin05gt

Shelby GT500 Member

Join Date: July 21, 2004

Location: New Jersey

Posts: 2,924

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

No FWD Mustang. Won't happen.

That said, all this new engine talk is quite exciting.

Reply Like

1/13/09, 09:19 PM

#33

bob

Legacy TMS Member

Join Date: May 16, 2004

Location: Bristol, TN

Posts: 5,197

Likes: 11

Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by stangfoeva

This could get really interesting. Could we possibly have 4 different engine choices? (Eco 4, Eco 6, 5.0, and SC 5.4)

I doubt it, I'd say Eco 4 (if the Eco 4 is available across the line). Eco 6, and whatever the future V8 mill will be for the Shelby. N/A V8s will probably be ADM Specials put out here or there to keep things interesting.

Reply Like

1/14/09, 12:19 AM

#34

Moosetang

Tasca Super Boss 429 Member

Join Date: February 1, 2004

Posts: 3,751

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by 83_vert

Found this at Jalopnik. This is the motor from the new Lincoln C concept. Maybe there will be a version of the motor with greater hp numbers. Check out that fuel economy estimate! Even with more hp in a heavier car than that concept, I'm thinking it should still get somewhere in the 30's, right? A 30+ MPG Mustang should help a little with the good ol' CAFE score.

"Featuring a 1.6-liter EcoBoost engine and Ford's all-new dry, dual-clutch PowerShift six-speed transmission, Lincoln C achieves a projected 43 mpg on the highway, while offering up an estimated 180 horsepower and 180 ft.-lbs. of torque."

I don't think the Mustang would use that 1.6, that's the smallest of the EB engines and is designed to supersede the bigger N/A I4s in use. The Ecoboost I4 which replaces the V6 will likely have a larger base displacement and a higher output, such as the 2.5 L that Motortrend mentions in this vid:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=521tQgqXwEY

Reply Like