GT track pack.

 

I didn't get that feature. You have to have the Premium to get it. Nice though.

 

Anyone else pull over 1 G in braking. I'm impressed in getting close to a G in cornering. I'm determined to get there some day.

 

.95 is the most I've seen in the turns, all stock

 

You all are not trying hard enough

Stock V6 Performance Package

 

I think .76 was my best acceleration with stock tires, pre-vortech days.

 

Amateurs....

 

I use Harry's Lap Timer and I've hit over 1G cornering.

 

Eh one sudden jerk will give you high numbers, I never launch mine hard and can pull almost 1g.

 

who can beat me on acceleration without forced induction.... ? lets see it

 

I highly doubt you achieved those numbers in steady state cornering.

 

Not on a Skid pad no, but running behind a KTM Motard Running through the Tail of the Dragon.This is also not jerking the wheel like someone else made the comment, steady in with Braking and steady out of the corners with acceleration. It is 318 corners in 11 miles so there are times when you are going into an opposite corner pretty quickly but I do know the corner that those numbers came from.

 

Did somebody say they want to pull some G's?

 

UMMM.... well.... I have a V6 and i have the EXACT same as you... does that mean I win because i have a smaller engine?

I didn't bring my car to work today but I will definitely take a shot if you want proof.

 

LMAO

 

hmmm.... did you get rear ended by a semi?

 

Is that how you achieved .87? lol no. I just took a picture. I was wrong. not .87.... it was .84. still not bad.

 

nope i achieved it with a v8

 

The engineer in me must disagree. There are no G's being pulled here. Straight line supersonic flight with very little acceleration = little to no G's.

 

And he did it with a V6, so what's your excuse?

Although if I look at the numbers.... and this seems like "the bridge to nowhere".. thanks Sara Palin, you effin idiot.

0.84g = 8.24 m/s/s hmmmm...

So 100km/h = 62mph =27.7 m/s so theoretically 0-62 would be achieved in 27.7/8.24 = 3.36s. Therefore the results are implausible unless we consider the theory that the Track Apps use MAX of the absolute value of acceleration collected over time. Which makes them pretty useless.

The end.

oh, and this isn't meant to say that the Track Apps are doomed, but to make them useful it would take a bit more software engineering effort to design them to average the data points along with some peak filtering to eliminate outliers in the data.