2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

4.5 second 0-60?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 01:13 PM
  #1  
NakedCat's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: August 21, 2012
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
4.5 second 0-60?

I have a '13 v6 with axlebacks, CAI and 93 hybrid tune. My recent best 0-60 time is 5.1 seconds. I have the stock gears, do you think a swap to 3.73's would get me to a 4.5 second 0-60 or would an aluminum driveshaft and/or lca's be needed?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 04:36 PM
  #2  
SlowRiderr's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 27, 2012
Posts: 229
Likes: 1
Nope
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
MadMoose's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 20, 2008
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
You'll probably need a supercharger or some such to get it that low
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 06:57 PM
  #4  
Tjb144's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: October 21, 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Or buy a GT
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 07:16 PM
  #5  
blackbullitt's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: May 30, 2012
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by NakedCat
I have a '13 v6 with axlebacks, CAI and 93 hybrid tune. My recent best 0-60 time is 5.1 seconds. I have the stock gears, do you think a swap to 3.73's would get me to a 4.5 second 0-60 or would an aluminum driveshaft and/or lca's be needed?
i think it will be hard to drop 6 tenths without forced induction. that is assuming that your current set up will only get you a 5.1 and the run was not limited by traction. i dont follow the v6 to much but i should think a 5.1 would be a solid time. thats quick, i would think a set of gears will drop that time as long as you have traction and it should be lots of fun to drive.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 07:34 PM
  #6  
going for broke's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 20, 2011
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
From: Bremen, Indiana
Originally Posted by NakedCat
I have a '13 v6 with axlebacks, CAI and 93 hybrid tune. My recent best 0-60 time is 5.1 seconds. I have the stock gears, do you think a swap to 3.73's would get me to a 4.5 second 0-60 or would an aluminum driveshaft and/or lca's be needed?
I think you could dip into the 4's but I don't see a 4.5. I'm running a tune and a cai in a gt and I regularly hit 4.3's. Traction is a huge issue as the times drop. I would guess I can get better then a 4.3 but it would take a stickier tire. Right now I'm running a stock tire but in a 275 fitment.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 08:21 PM
  #7  
mac951's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2012
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles


American muscle got it down to 4.3 w/o forced induction, but they still did a ton of work on it. Not sure how accurate their numbers were but just some more info for you.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 08:37 PM
  #8  
PaxtonShelby's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 6, 2012
Posts: 560
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Dang...that American Muscle V6 runs...
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 09:47 PM
  #9  
NakedCat's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: August 21, 2012
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Guess I will find out Wednesday what the improvement is. This will be my last mod until March. Then it's an aluminum driveshaft, new wheels/tires and more. Was thinking a turbo or supercharger after my tax return/bonus check in April, but I think it's too early in the cars life for me to decide.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013 | 09:08 AM
  #10  
fdesalvo's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 11, 2012
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: N'awlins/SoCal
5.1 Seconds is amazing lol. Look at where V8s were just 5 years ago. My S2000 hits 60 in the high 5s. That Ford V6 is a beast.

Last edited by fdesalvo; Jan 8, 2013 at 09:11 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013 | 09:22 AM
  #11  
NakedCat's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: August 21, 2012
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by fdesalvo
5.1 Seconds is amazing lol. Look at where V8s were just 5 years ago. My S2000 hits 60 in the high 5s. That Ford V6 is a beast.
My goal was 5 flat before swapping gears and I could probably get it if there wasn't so much traction loss when I launch.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013 | 09:30 AM
  #12  
Ronin38's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 27, 2010
Posts: 754
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by mac951
American muscle got it down to 4.3 w/o forced induction, but they still did a ton of work on it. Not sure how accurate their numbers were but just some more info for you.
I'm a little surprised they're getting such good handling with the NT 555 DR's on the back, does anyone know how that tire would compare to the regular 555 or the 555 Extreme? I don't really know what the exact differences are with those, besides the tread depth when new...

I just know that "generally" I wouldn't choose a drag radial for slaloms and road course work.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013 | 10:07 AM
  #13  
fdesalvo's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 11, 2012
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: N'awlins/SoCal
"Ronin" - best chase scenes in a movie - ever.

Originally Posted by Ronin38
I'm a little surprised they're getting such good handling with the NT 555 DR's on the back, does anyone know how that tire would compare to the regular 555 or the 555 Extreme? I don't really know what the exact differences are with those, besides the tread depth when new...

I just know that "generally" I wouldn't choose a drag radial for slaloms and road course work.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 04:15 AM
  #14  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by Ronin38
I'm a little surprised they're getting such good handling with the NT 555 DR's on the back, does anyone know how that tire would compare to the regular 555 or the 555 Extreme? I don't really know what the exact differences are with those, besides the tread depth when new...

I just know that "generally" I wouldn't choose a drag radial for slaloms and road course work.
If they are anything like the NT05R's - they blow for anything outside of drag racing and just cruising down the road in a straight line. Especially if they have a taller sidewall.

Now that could just be bvecause I have what amounts to a schizophrenic set-up on my car (305/45R18 NT05Rs x 255/45R18 KDWS) and that creates some interesting handling.

Drag radials are pretty sticky but the sidewall is optimized for getting the car to hook and down the track in as short a time as possible so they are closer to a regular passenger car tire in that steering response and high lateral loads are secondary

I suppose on a road course or on roads that aren't particularly demanding tires like the NT555 DR are passable, but compared to an equally sticky tire that is purpose built for a road course or auto-cross they are less capable.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 04:35 AM
  #15  
David Young's Avatar
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
 
Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 3,381
Likes: 125
From: Clinton Tennessee
I think i'm in the high 4's, but i'll never see that without drag radials
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 05:05 PM
  #16  
NakedCat's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: August 21, 2012
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Well, my best with the 3.73's is 5.3 and I just chirp the whole way to 60. I haven't tried it with traction control on. I think some LCA's are in order and what else?
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 06:57 PM
  #17  
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by NakedCat
Well, my best with the 3.73's is 5.3 and I just chirp the whole way to 60. I haven't tried it with traction control on. I think some LCA's are in order and what else?
Are you on the stock tires? Are you spinning a good deal when punching it from a dead stop. 5.3 is a great time but I thought 3:31 gears the 11 plus v6 could run 5.1 to 5.3, 0-60 MPH.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 08:09 PM
  #18  
NakedCat's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: August 21, 2012
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue

Are you on the stock tires? Are you spinning a good deal when punching it from a dead stop. 5.3 is a great time but I thought 3:31 gears the 11 plus v6 could run 5.1 to 5.3, 0-60 MPH.
Yes I am on stock tires, and yes I am spinning tires like crazy. I ran 5.1 with 2.73's, I didn't realize how wet the ground was as it was dark out, but it's fairly wet out I realized it had rained a little and that might be why I can't get any traction. I will see again tomorrow. I'm not getting new tires/wheels till spring, so hoping its just the wetness.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 04:58 AM
  #19  
Ronin38's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 27, 2010
Posts: 754
Likes: 1
Don't drive yourself too crazy trying to set record times on the stock tires. They are "less than ideal" for traction.

My GT came with 235-series all-season tires, and they're a very poor choice for a high-horsepower car.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 06:59 AM
  #20  
Ian_289's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: December 27, 2012
Posts: 156
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Ronin38
My GT came with 235-series all-season tires, and they're a very poor choice for a high-horsepower car.
235 series on a GT??? Really? Was that for all 4 wheels? Or are the backs wider?
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 PM.