2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

2012 to 2015 50th edition upgrade at 17400miles?

Old Dec 13, 2014 | 10:30 AM
  #1  
HizliBullet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 11, 2009
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 4
2012 to 2015 50th edition upgrade at 17400miles?

The more I want to wait the more I want it. 50th anniversary edition is limited with only 1964 built, and my local dealer has the kona manual trans that I really want, the dilemma is I have a glass roof loaded 12 GT with 17400 miles, am I trading it up too soon? its a bone stock car, no mods, with engine ticking.. will I regret if I dont act quick?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2014 | 12:01 PM
  #2  
BaknBlk's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: June 19, 2011
Posts: 196
Likes: 4
I'll tell you what my 15 year old son told me when I was undecided on trading my 09 GT with glass roof and a lot of mods for a new 13 Boss 302...."Dad, you know you really want it, so if you can afford it, get it...don't miss out"....he then added, you can always get another glass roof 09 and do it all over again, but there are only so many Boss 302's.....

So, if it's something you find yourself thinking about ALL the time, then I'd say go for it....those LE's will only be new once and there are only so many of them

Good luck....happy holidays !!!
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2014 | 02:08 PM
  #3  
RedStang1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: December 7, 2014
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
You should look at what you want to do with the car if you get the 50th edition. Are you planning to daily drive it or keep it for a collectors car? I don't know if you would be worried about putting miles on the car and then you can't even enjoy it! Or is it the new style that you like? I wanted the 2015 style but I have a 2014.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2014 | 11:22 PM
  #4  
scott9050's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 9, 2014
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Around here the premium on the 50th anniversary car is $25,000 over MSRP.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2014 | 08:22 AM
  #5  
Siber Express's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 19, 2010
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 567
From: Clinton TN
Originally Posted by scott9050
Around here the premium on the 50th anniversary car is $25,000 over MSRP.
Around here the are going for sticker or less, 44,000 50th with Performance Mustang for right around 40,000 and this one is going MSRP http://www.lancecunninghamford.com/n...6P8CF7F5316341
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2014 | 10:00 AM
  #6  
HizliBullet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 11, 2009
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 4
the dealer that i phoned said they sold the one i inquired about $10000 over msrp at $65000 canadian dollars
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2014 | 10:00 AM
  #7  
HizliBullet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 11, 2009
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 4
thats okay with me ill just wait for the GT350
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2014 | 07:41 AM
  #8  
scott9050's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 9, 2014
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Siber Express
Around here the are going for sticker or less, 44,000 50th with Performance Mustang for right around 40,000 and this one is going MSRP http://www.lancecunninghamford.com/n...6P8CF7F5316341
That says only what the list price is. I would not be surprised if you walked up and found a market adjustment sticker on it with a ridiculous price like this:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ford-Mustang-GT-2015-ford-mustang-gt-50-th-anniversary-wimbledon-white-759-/301438523459?forcerrptr=true&hash=item462f22d843&item=301438523459&pt=US_Cars_Trucks

Last edited by scott9050; Dec 16, 2014 at 07:46 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2014 | 07:47 AM
  #9  
dinobike19's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: December 15, 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Wpg Canada
My issue is that it was made in 64 not 65. look back and all the anniversary models line up to make 50 years at 2014 not 2015. So question. is the 84, 94, 2004 models wrong? or just the 2015?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2014 | 09:41 AM
  #10  
eguillen3.7's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: December 12, 2014
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by HizliBullet
The more I want to wait the more I want it. 50th anniversary edition is limited with only 1964 built, and my local dealer has the kona manual trans that I really want, the dilemma is I have a glass roof loaded 12 GT with 17400 miles, am I trading it up too soon? its a bone stock car, no mods, with engine ticking.. will I regret if I dont act quick?
Just go for it if u really want it cuz then ur gonna regret not getting it
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2014 | 01:34 PM
  #11  
Varilux's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2013
Posts: 678
Likes: 5
From: Hickory Creek, TX
I agree with the previous poster who compared this to the Boss 302... There are only so many, and if that is what you want and you have the resources than go for it.

That said, I do not believe these anniversary editions will hold the value the same way the Bosses have. First, there really aren't any performance upgrades (correct me if I'm wrong), and the "cosmetic" special editions never seem to fare all that well as time goes on. Second, we can argue all we want about the front end of the '15, but I have to believe Ford will eventually listen to all the voices saying this is the weak point of the car aesthetically. As a result, in a couple model years, the front end will be at least tweaked into something everyone will like even better- which will position the anniversary models as the "pre-fixed" S550. Just my opinion, and worth less than $0.02.

Last edited by Varilux; Dec 17, 2014 at 02:01 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2014 | 06:17 PM
  #12  
70monte's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 27, 2013
Posts: 684
Likes: 4
Here is one a few hours from me that seems like it is at list price though I can't read the window sticker. This is the one I would get if I had the money.
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/ctd/4796818629.html

Wayne
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2014 | 07:24 PM
  #13  
SteelTownStang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: July 1, 2006
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by dinobike19
My issue is that it was made in 64 not 65. look back and all the anniversary models line up to make 50 years at 2014 not 2015. So question. is the 84, 94, 2004 models wrong? or just the 2015?
It was a 1964 1/2- model year 1965. This information is available from numerous sources. Here are a couple quick finds:http://mustangs.about.com/od/1965/a/1964-5-mustang.htm
and https://themustangsource.com/timeline/64-66/64/... Regardless, I wouldn't lose any sleep either way...
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2014 | 11:14 AM
  #14  
HizliBullet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 11, 2009
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 4
i phoned 3 dealers this week..all regions of canada..even far eastern corners having snow storms.. all sold out..getting frustrated and frazzled
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2014 | 03:53 AM
  #15  
Nocturnal'14's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 20, 2011
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: KY/OH/MO
Originally Posted by BaknBlk
I'll tell you what my 15 year old son told me ..."Dad, you know you really want it, so if you can afford it, get it...don't miss out"....!
Sounds like today's youth! No disrespect to your son by any means, but that seems to be the ongoing mindset of Americans these days, buy it if you want it...don't worry about the consequences! Charge, Charge, Charge!

OP: Keep your 2012....Trust me, its not worth the upgrade!

Last edited by Nocturnal'14; Dec 20, 2014 at 03:56 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2014 | 07:49 PM
  #16  
Varilux's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2013
Posts: 678
Likes: 5
From: Hickory Creek, TX
It was a 1964 1/2- model year 1965. This information is available from numerous sources. Here are a couple quick finds:http://mustangs.about.com/od/1965/a/1964-5-mustang.htm
and https://themustangsource.com/timeline/64-66/64/... Regardless, I wouldn't lose any sleep either way...


You are, of course, correct- there was no '64 1/2 Mustang, the original year of the car was 1965 (just released a bit early).


However, that doesn't change the fact that the 50th rendition of the Mustang was the 2014 (simple math). The 2015 is the 51st Ford Mustang- the only thing 50th about it is Ford's desire to hype the introduction of a new platform (and there's nothing wrong with that- the original Mustang was primarily marketing-driven as well).
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2014 | 07:54 PM
  #17  
SplitSecond's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 21, 2014
Posts: 331
Likes: 16
Originally Posted by SteelTownStang

It was a 1964 1/2- model year 1965. This information is available from numerous sources. Here are a couple quick finds:http://mustangs.about.com/od/1965/a/1964-5-mustang.htm
and https://themustangsource.com/timeline/64-66/64/... Regardless, I wouldn't lose any sleep either way...
Except the 45th anniversary was in 2009, the 40th in 2004, the 35th in 1999, ect. It doesn't really make a difference, it's just inconsistent with what Ford has done in the past.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2014 | 09:06 PM
  #18  
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
OP, if its that important to you to have the 50th anniversary, go for it. If your purchase is solely based on the hopes this is going to be some type of collector pony, you may want to rethink that. It ain't gonna be worth a bunch of loot.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 04:12 AM
  #19  
wannabe's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: March 7, 2010
Posts: 993
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Nocturnal'14
Sounds like today's youth! No disrespect to your son by any means, but that seems to be the ongoing mindset of Americans these days, buy it if you want it...don't worry about the consequences! Charge, Charge, Charge!

OP: Keep your 2012....Trust me, its not worth the upgrade!
Note the son did mention 'if you can afford it'...
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 07:28 AM
  #20  
houtex's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 7,648
Likes: 675
From: Insane
Originally Posted by dinobike19
My issue is that it was made in 64 not 65. look back and all the anniversary models line up to make 50 years at 2014 not 2015. So question. is the 84, 94, 2004 models wrong? or just the 2015?
Originally Posted by SteelTownStang
It was a 1964 1/2- model year 1965. This information is available from numerous sources. Here are a couple quick finds:http://mustangs.about.com/od/1965/a/1964-5-mustang.htm
and https://themustangsource.com/timeline/64-66/64/... Regardless, I wouldn't lose any sleep either way...
Originally Posted by Varilux
It was a 1964 1/2- model year 1965. This information is available from numerous sources. Here are a couple quick finds:http://mustangs.about.com/od/1965/a/1964-5-mustang.htm
and https://themustangsource.com/timeline/64-66/64/... Regardless, I wouldn't lose any sleep either way...


You are, of course, correct- there was no '64 1/2 Mustang, the original year of the car was 1965 (just released a bit early).


However, that doesn't change the fact that the 50th rendition of the Mustang was the 2014 (simple math). The 2015 is the 51st Ford Mustang- the only thing 50th about it is Ford's desire to hype the introduction of a new platform (and there's nothing wrong with that- the original Mustang was primarily marketing-driven as well).
Originally Posted by SplitSecond
Except the 45th anniversary was in 2009, the 40th in 2004, the 35th in 1999, ect. It doesn't really make a difference, it's just inconsistent with what Ford has done in the past.

Sweeping you all up in this one...

The 1964.5 Mustang was a 1965 model year, and always was. Only us enthusiasts make a big deal about it, if we make a big deal at all.

But consider... they made a 2015 model (50 years apart), with a 50th edition car...

In **2014**. 2015 is 10 days away yet (as of this posting). Varilux has it right.

They did just fine, Ford did. This is not a nit to pick, IMO.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:04 PM.