Ford Discussions Non-Mustang Ford Products

Mercury Cougar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2006 | 10:28 PM
  #1  
fordsvt2006's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: March 2, 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Mercury Cougar

What dose everyone think about the 2000-2002 Mercury Cougars? I think they look alright but have to small of an engine and not enough power.
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 05:25 AM
  #2  
ov3n's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 3
From: Milwaukee, WI
I traded a cougar in on my Mustang.
It was a nice car. Handled well, easy to drive, got reasonable gas mileage. The 01-02 had the most comfortable seats Ford has ever made.
The cougar looks like a million bucks, but it is true, it doesn't have the ***** to back up its looks. It's not a race car.
The 2.5L Duratec is an excellent engine. Keep it maintained well and it'll last a long time. The engine loves high revs. Plus it's one of the best sounding v6's you'll ever hear.
But if you want something that looks nice, is comfortable, has a nice interior, and NO ONE knows what it is, the cougar is the car for you.
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 07:09 AM
  #3  
Greywolf's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 4, 2004
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
I had one but the auto sucked if you slowed down then speed up the trans would think about it forever before shifting.
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 09:55 AM
  #4  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Originally Posted by ov3n
The 2.5L Duratec is an excellent engine. Keep it maintained well and it'll last a long time. The engine loves high revs. Plus it's one of the best sounding v6's you'll ever hear.
Wasn't that same engine used in Contour?
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 12:19 PM
  #5  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
most likely
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 12:44 PM
  #6  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
I'm going to move this thread to 'Other Fords'.
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 04:42 AM
  #7  
ov3n's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 3
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by Red Star
Wasn't that same engine used in Contour?
The Contour and Cougar were mechanically identical. Same everything - `cept the body panels and interior.
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 04:43 AM
  #8  
ov3n's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 3
From: Milwaukee, WI
And yes. the auto tranny on the Cougar is quite awful. It sucks life right out of the engine. How awful is the auto?

Well, a v6 Cougar with the auto is slower than an i4 cougar with the manual.

The manual transmission, on the other hand, is quite good. The only major weak link in it is the differential. They are prone to blow if you get an excessive amount of wheel hop on repeated hard launches. Luckilly you can purchase a Quaife or Torsen limited-slip differential, which will improve handling and increase reliability. But if you don't beat the snot out of the car, you probably don't need to worry about that.
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 01:55 PM
  #9  
wildstanglx90's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: May 27, 2004
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 1
From: NY
I also liked thier looks a lot. I always thought it would've been cool if SVT could've done something with the cougar, but I don't know if SVT could/would do Merc's?. I don't know much about these '00-'02 Cougar's, but now i'm just curious....were the 4 and 6 cyl the only engine options? Were they FWD or RWD?
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #10  
ov3n's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 3
From: Milwaukee, WI
The only engine options were the 2.0L Zetec (130hp) and the 2.5L Duratec (170hp). 99-02 Cougars were FWD. Mercury did have a special edition model ready to go, called the Cougar S, which used the SVT Contour engine and had upgraded suspension components. But SVT made a big stink about mercury using one of their engines, and Ford was getting ready to drop the cougar anyways, so besides a few prototypes, the S was never released to the public. It would have had the 196hp (or 200, depending on who you ask) 2.5L Duratec that the SVT Contour had.
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 06:16 PM
  #11  
wildstanglx90's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: May 27, 2004
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 1
From: NY
That 'S' model would've been sweet. It interested me enough to search the net for more info out of curiosity, I found this webpage. Check it out, nice read on the 'S' and the pics look like it would've been a very nice car!

http://www.scottgrundfor.com/concept/1999cougar.html
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 09:59 PM
  #12  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Ford went with wrong way with Cougar anyway. Cougar started as better Mustang, then as better Thunderbird and it ended as economy car.
Reply
Old May 29, 2006 | 10:05 AM
  #13  
ov3n's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 3
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by wildstanglx90
That 'S' model would've been sweet. It interested me enough to search the net for more info out of curiosity, I found this webpage. Check it out, nice read on the 'S' and the pics look like it would've been a very nice car!

http://www.scottgrundfor.com/concept/1999cougar.html
That was the concept... The production model would have looked like a plain-jane cougar, and not awd.
Reply
Old May 29, 2006 | 07:32 PM
  #14  
fordsvt2006's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: March 2, 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Do you think a manuel V6 would be worth getting? Just wondering
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2006 | 06:17 AM
  #15  
ov3n's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 3
From: Milwaukee, WI
Depends on what you want in a car.
The Cougar is not a fast car, but is really fun to drive, gets decent gas mileage, and is very easy to drive.

I'd say avoid the 99's and 00's if you can.. the 01/02's seem to be a touch more reliable...
If you look for a 99/00, avoid ones with a sunroof.. The sunroof track on them is plastic, and is prone to breaking, and you have to purchase a whole new sunroof assembly (about $1100) to replace it. 01/02s got a metal track so they are okay and less-breakable.

Also, being a hatchback, the trunk is huge and easily accessible. Good for hauling stuff.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 08:02 PM
  #16  
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: July 21, 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
I bought a brand new one of these in '01. Initially I thought it was a good idea, but it wasn't. I bought a stick, and I can tell you with authority that my '93 Probe GT would've eaten that thing alive. On top of that, there are like 90 blind spots in that car. It is very difficult to see out of it. It was reliable, but I only kept the car for like 9 months. I lost my shirt on it because while I had it they finally decided to discontinue production of it.

If you don't mind mediocre seats (can't believe someone said those seats are the best) blind spots and being eaten alive by MANY Hondas, Nissans, Mazdas and a host of other small cars, then buy one.

Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 07:07 AM
  #17  
ov3n's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 3
From: Milwaukee, WI
Can't believe someone said the seats are mediocre :-P
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 10:38 AM
  #18  
jayguy's Avatar
Team Mustang Source Legacy Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 5
From: Las Vegas
I can't believe they got rid of the Probe Gt so quickly. I had a '94 GT 5 sp, and it was the second most enjoyable car I've owned. The first was my '05 Mustang GT. Some days I miss the old Probe. Well, especially now, when I'm driving a crappy '79 GMC truck with no ***** whatsoever.

I loved that Probe though, and was hoping the Cougar was an upgrade, but never got a chance to even sit in one.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1001yos
Ford Discussions
0
Sep 8, 2015 10:05 PM
Avenger
1964-1970 Mustang
15
Sep 21, 2004 02:19 PM
igorretina
General Vehicle Discussion/News
18
Aug 18, 2004 02:47 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 PM.