Ford Duratec 35 thrives on simplicity
#4
Bullitt Member
Join Date: February 17, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i remeber hearing about a larger displacment version of the 3.5.......i think it was for a 3.7 that was supposed to be in lincolns. Anyone know if there are any "known" plans for that?
#5
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
#7
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
#9
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
Second, let's get some true numbers to work with. While the MKX does weigh in at 4200 lbs, the RX weighs in at 4100 lbs not 3600 (and that's straight from the Lexus web site).
BTW, the Lexus actually gets worse gas mileage than the MKX as well and requires 91 octane to boot.
#10
Gahh, I'm an idiot. MKX ....MKZ....I flipped 'em.
Oh wait, I'm not the idiot, whoever invented Mercury's new nomenclature is the idiot.
But, now that we are talking about the MKZ, my question remains, why does it get Mustang GT mileage?
Oh wait, I'm not the idiot, whoever invented Mercury's new nomenclature is the idiot.
But, now that we are talking about the MKZ, my question remains, why does it get Mustang GT mileage?
#11
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
Well, the MKZ is rated at 18/26 whereas the Stang is rated at 17/25 (manual) and 17/23 (auto) so the Lincoln is slightly better.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post