Ford-commissioned study finds quality of its cars on par with Honda, Toyota
#1
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ford-commissioned study finds quality of its cars on par with Honda, Toyota
#2
Closet American
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
They're kidding, right?
And what would one suppose a "Ford-commissioned" study to say?
"Yeah, after careful analysis, we've discovered our cars are crap and we thought we would share that with out customers."
And what would one suppose a "Ford-commissioned" study to say?
"Yeah, after careful analysis, we've discovered our cars are crap and we thought we would share that with out customers."
#3
Legacy TMS Member
The same people do these studies for other manufacturers and in the past, the results have mirrored the results from JD Powers.
#4
Closet American
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I mean, I know all corporations are squeaky clean, but...
#5
Legacy TMS Member
Well, like I said, they do these types of studies other manufacturers. If they start biasing the results in each manufacturers studies then the aggregate results will look awefully inconsistent don't you think?
#6
Closet American
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
All of which is academic, because it sounds from your reply as though this company is hired by numerous manufacturers to do this, so one would expect the results to be "unfiltered" or "cooked".
I think it's quite clear now that Ford's overall quality is significantly on the rise. All that remains is to make product more universally appealing and they'll be there.
Last edited by Hollywood_North GT; 4/7/08 at 07:24 PM.
#7
Legacy TMS Member
#8
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: January 1, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hahahahahaha
that's hilarious.
not even close. If it wasn't for the awesome body and the rumbling, gurgling, burbling V8, this POS turd would get traded in so fast...
I'm at 12,000 miles and have oodles of rattles and shimmies already..... I cant wait to get to 50,000!
If they want quality, kill the unions and the ridiculous costs they create and get some legitimate performance pay incentives going and they will be on the right track....
that's hilarious.
not even close. If it wasn't for the awesome body and the rumbling, gurgling, burbling V8, this POS turd would get traded in so fast...
I'm at 12,000 miles and have oodles of rattles and shimmies already..... I cant wait to get to 50,000!
If they want quality, kill the unions and the ridiculous costs they create and get some legitimate performance pay incentives going and they will be on the right track....
#9
Needs to be more Astony
I wanna know how Fords 1284 problems is par with 1250 of honda and toyota.. On par would be Ford at 1250 as well, so they are doing better but still have not equaled the big 2 from japan.
#10
FR500 Member
Join Date: August 15, 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ford must be using the "new math" people have been talking about for the longest time!
#11
Legacy TMS Member
#12
Needs to be more Astony
In this kinda of study there are only 3 posible outcomes.
Being worse (where Ford is)
Being same (what par whould be)
Being better (where we want Ford to be)
#13
Legacy TMS Member
At any rate, in my non-professional opinion, it's close enough to say it's "on par".
#14
Legacy TMS Member Pr
You'd have to ask a statistician what would be a statistically acceptable variance. Ever seen how in many polls, they'll say something like "the 5% difference is statistically insignificant"? Perhaps the experts at RDA told Ford that the less than 3% variance was insigificant?
At any rate, in my non-professional opinion, it's close enough to say it's "on par".
At any rate, in my non-professional opinion, it's close enough to say it's "on par".
#17
Legacy TMS Member
#18
Legacy TMS Member
Just about every major corporation has them done. I work for one of the largest Fortune 500 companies and we have them done every year. Of course, the only ones that get published are the ones with a favorable outcome. Ford's been doing them for years but it's no accident this is the first time they've published the results.
#19
Closet American
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Is quality defined as reliability?
Is quality defined as fit & finish (both inside and out)?
Is quality defined as "gotta have it" styling?
Is quality defined as customer service (both before and after the sale)?
Is quality defined as vehicle performance; vehicle power and dynamics (vis-a-vis the competition); usability of features; desirability of content; minimal obvious cost-cutting, etc, etc, etc.
Ford has made great strides on some of the above issues; moderate progress on others; and is still behind the eight ball in a few other categories (depending, of course, upon which model we're discussing).
#20
Legacy TMS Member
I think we have to define what "quality" is, too, because that definition is often a matter of perception.
Is quality defined as reliability? YES
Is quality defined as fit & finish (both inside and out)? YES
Is quality defined as "gotta have it" styling? NO
Is quality defined as customer service (both before and after the sale)? YES
Is quality defined as vehicle performance; vehicle power and dynamics (vis-a-vis the competition); usability of features; desirability of content; minimal obvious cost-cutting, etc, etc, etc. NO
Ford has made great strides on some of the above issues; moderate progress on others; and is still behind the eight ball in a few other categories (depending, of course, upon which model we're discussing).
Is quality defined as reliability? YES
Is quality defined as fit & finish (both inside and out)? YES
Is quality defined as "gotta have it" styling? NO
Is quality defined as customer service (both before and after the sale)? YES
Is quality defined as vehicle performance; vehicle power and dynamics (vis-a-vis the competition); usability of features; desirability of content; minimal obvious cost-cutting, etc, etc, etc. NO
Ford has made great strides on some of the above issues; moderate progress on others; and is still behind the eight ball in a few other categories (depending, of course, upon which model we're discussing).
IMO, the "NO" answers don't represent "quality". You could design a car with "gotta have it" styling and tons of features but if it breaks down all the time, it isn't "quality".