Ford Discussions Non-Mustang Ford Products

f150 33/23 MPG in 1983!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 08:56 AM
  #1  
05stangkc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator clevparts@aol.com
 
Joined: November 27, 2004
Posts: 12,589
Likes: 4,341
From: Visalia Ca.
f150 33/23 MPG in 1983!

I stumbled over this in and Old Car and Driver.


Enjoy,

Kc
Attached Thumbnails f150 33/23 MPG in 1983!-83f150.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 09:21 AM
  #2  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
Yeah, though we have different measures for calculating MPG today, but still impressive. Shows how far we have NOT come in the last 25 years. Those 4.9 6's are darn near bullet proof as well!
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 09:26 AM
  #3  
05stangkc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator clevparts@aol.com
 
Joined: November 27, 2004
Posts: 12,589
Likes: 4,341
From: Visalia Ca.
You would think we would Have been a Lot Further Down the Road on our MPG's!, Btw Folks this was Pre Fuel Injection.

Kc
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 09:47 AM
  #4  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Honestly cars havn't really increased in mpg over the years much. But todays cars are doing exact same mpg on a lot more weight and a lot more power.

Another thing is the EPA used to rate mpg hwy at 55mph i believe. I bet you could get 33mpg on a F150 at 55mph.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 11:48 AM
  #5  
Indystang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 16, 2004
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield In.
Each manufacture put the numbers up themselves and they were lying. Go look at the little GLC Plymouth from about the late 70's. It says something like 47-54 mpg. Basically they were running the cars on a treadmill @50 mph or something like that. There was so much public outrage at the farce being committed that the Government stepped in and dictated some standards. Also these were very low compression engines and complete dogs to drive. We should have better to choose from now though you are right!
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:41 PM
  #6  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
They probably got that gas mileage rating with a base 1/2 ton with the 300ci 6 , a manual trans with overdrive, and a 2.73 rear end. The '80s F150s probably weighed about as much as a fully loaded 2WD Ranger of today.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 04:15 PM
  #7  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Sounds way too good to be true.

33 mpg highway for a truck? Yeah, right, not even Ranger can get that.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 07:40 PM
  #8  
saleen367's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: August 3, 2008
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: SE MN
Originally Posted by 05stangkc
You would think we would Have been a Lot Further Down the Road on our MPG's!, Btw Folks this was Pre Fuel Injection.

Kc
To meet the goal of doubling the 1974 passenger car fuel economy average by 1985 (to 27.5 mpg), Congress set fuel economy standards for some of the intervening years. Passenger car standards were established for MY 1978 (18 mpg); MY 1979 (19 mpg); MY 1980 (20 mpg); and for MY 1985 and thereafter (27.5 mpg). Congress left the level of 1981-84 standards to the Department to establish administratively. Subsequently, standards of 22, 24, 26, and 27 mpg were established. For the post-1985 period, Congress provided for the continued application of the 27.5 mpg standard for passenger cars, but gave the Department the authority to set higher or lower standards. From MY 1986 through 1989, the passenger car standards were lowered. Thereafter, in MY 1990, the passenger car standard was amended to 27.5 mpg, which it has remained at this level.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 07:55 PM
  #9  
karman's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 32
Here is the answer from someone that was buying trucks back then...
The EPA estimate was 23MPG.
The manufacturer could say what ever they wanted about highway estimates.

My friend say his got about 20, but that engine has so much torque...
It was with or without towing the boat!!! (no difference at all)
.
BTW my ranger can get 28mpg @65-70mph.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ecostang
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1661
Nov 3, 2022 08:50 PM
NC14GT
Road Trips
43
Sep 10, 2017 04:47 PM
unnoticedtrails
V6 Performance Mods
20
Aug 18, 2015 03:11 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:43 AM.