Ford Discussions Non-Mustang Ford Products

Alan Mulally: Ford's agent of change

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 01:46 PM
  #1  
TomServo92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Alan Mulally: Ford's agent of change

This article is a very interesting read about how Mulally is changing Ford's culture. It's amazing that Ford ever got any products to market with the old culture. Here's a quote from the article:

In the not-too-distant past, some executives actively tried to undermine their rivals by withholding vital support for projects or delaying programs they felt did more to benefit others.

Some would do their best to get responsibility for costly projects shifted to other departments, so that the expense would not be a drag on their own bottom line.

"This was really a loose confederation of independent businesses," said one executive. "A lot has changed here in terms of knocking down those fiefdoms."
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 02:15 PM
  #2  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Nice find.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #3  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
The 100 billion $ question is why didn't something like this happen @ Ford 5 or even 10 years ago?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 04:15 PM
  #4  
TomServo92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by V10
The 100 billion $ question is why didn't something like this happen @ Ford 5 or even 10 years ago?
For 2 reasons:

1) There wasn't the dire need to change 5-10 years ago that there is now

and

2) There wasn't someone with the will to tear down the old school bureaucracy.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 04:51 PM
  #5  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
1) There was the need for this sort of change 5 - 10 years ago. One could argue even 20 or 30 years ago. The problem was that Ford was still turning enough of a profit that the need for change wasn't recognized. But certainly the need for this sort of change was recognized 5 years ago which was the reason to Bill Ford fired Nassar and took over. It appears that Bill Ford didn't have the ***** to make the needed changes.

2) That's the real reason. In one of the other Mulally articles (I think WSJ) they mentioned a usless top executive that Mulally pushed into retirement. It sounded like this guy should have been fired 10 years ago, but he kept is job and his empire because he was Bill Ford's fishing buddy.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 04:56 PM
  #6  
TomServo92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by V10
1) There was the need for this sort of change 5 - 10 years ago. One could argue even 20 or 30 years ago. The problem was that Ford was still turning enough of a profit that the need for change wasn't recognized. But certainly the need for this sort of change was recognized 5 years ago which was the reason to Bill Ford fired Nassar and took over. It appears that Bill Ford didn't have the ***** to make the needed changes.
Exactly. That's why I said there wasn't a dire need at that time. They were still making a good profit. Even 5 years ago it hadn't reached the critical stage it's at now (at least in the minds of Ford's upper management AKA Bill Ford and his cronies).

2) That's the real reason. In one of the other Mulally articles (I think WSJ) they mentioned a usless top executive that Mulally pushed into retirement. It sounded like this guy should have been fired 10 years ago, but he kept is job and his empire because he was Bill Ford's fishing buddy.
Well, at least Bill Ford had the ***** to hire Mulally and empower him to make the changes.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 05:05 PM
  #7  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
From the sounds of it, he's doing the right things...
Hopefully the results will say the same thing.

Good going Alan
Take this b***h to the next level
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 05:46 PM
  #8  
Moosetang's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by V10
1)...In one of the other Mulally articles (I think WSJ) they mentioned a usless top executive that Mulally pushed into retirement. It sounded like this guy should have been fired 10 years ago, but he kept is job and his empire because he was Bill Ford's fishing buddy.
It's more than one guy. Bill Ford had the desire to enact change but wasn't a strong enough or experienced enough leader to actaully get it done. Be let the 'crats stonewall him into Ford's current state. The conservative "don't change anything, don't take risks" personalities dominated all aspects of Ford for years. They're a big reason the Freestyle and 500 look like nothing, and why there's still multiple Ford Companys worldwide instead of one united FMC.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 06:05 PM
  #9  
TomServo92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by Moosetang
It's more than one guy. Bill Ford had the desire to enact change but wasn't a strong enough or experienced enough leader to actaully get it done. Be let the 'crats stonewall him into Ford's current state. The conservative "don't change anything, don't take risks" personalities dominated all aspects of Ford for years. They're a big reason the Freestyle and 500 look like nothing, and why there's still multiple Ford Companys worldwide instead of one united FMC.
I don't think V10 way saying it was "only one guy" that was the problem. He was just citing an example of Mulally cleaning out the dead wood.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 06:57 PM
  #10  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by TomServo92
I don't think V10 way saying it was "only one guy" that was the problem. He was just citing an example of Mulally cleaning out the dead wood.
Thank you, that's what I was saying.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 07:05 PM
  #11  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
I'll tell you another thing Mulally needs to do, Eliminate the Ford executive garage.

Ford execs are given Ford vehicles to drive and they are maintained by Ford's executive garage. The garage cleans, services, repairs the vehicles and fills the gas tanks. Ford execs are completely shielded from the hassles of trying to deal for FLM dealers for both purchase and repair.

ALL Ford execs. must be required, every year, to go purchase a new FoMoCo vehicle from a randomly selected dealer without any Ford purchase plan A-Z and without any identification that they are a Ford employee. The execs must then take their vehicles to different FLM dealers and get their Ford vehicles serviced again incognito.

If Mulally did this I guarantee you that within 1 year Ford's dealer network would be straightened out big time.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 12:33 AM
  #12  
hi5.0's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
if they're "forced" to do that, the biggest change would probably be a lot of said executives leaving the company if they had to deal with the crap most everyone else seems to get at the dealership! Nice idea, but don't see that happening anytime soon. Now if they instituted a "secret shopper"-type program as a means for quality control, that would be good - but then there is the question of funding.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 05:57 AM
  #13  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
Originally Posted by V10
I'll tell you another thing Mulally needs to do, Eliminate the Ford executive garage.

Ford execs are given Ford vehicles to drive and they are maintained by Ford's executive garage. The garage cleans, services, repairs the vehicles and fills the gas tanks. Ford execs are completely shielded from the hassles of trying to deal for FLM dealers for both purchase and repair.

ALL Ford execs. must be required, every year, to go purchase a new FoMoCo vehicle from a randomly selected dealer without any Ford purchase plan A-Z and without any identification that they are a Ford employee. The execs must then take their vehicles to different FLM dealers and get their Ford vehicles serviced again incognito.

If Mulally did this I guarantee you that within 1 year Ford's dealer network would be straightened out big time.
That would be absolutely fantastic, and should be a no brainier.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 10:32 AM
  #14  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
Originally Posted by TomServo92
This article is a very interesting read about how Mulally is changing Ford's culture. It's amazing that Ford ever got any products to market with the old culture. Here's a quote from the article:

In the not-too-distant past, some executives actively tried to undermine their rivals by withholding vital support for projects or delaying programs they felt did more to benefit others.

Some would do their best to get responsibility for costly projects shifted to other departments, so that the expense would not be a drag on their own bottom line.

"This was really a loose confederation of independent businesses," said one executive. "A lot has changed here in terms of knocking down those fiefdoms."
That kind of stuff happens in a lot of really large organizations. The bigger a company or organization gets, the more international or regional divisions a company gets, the worse it becomes. I've seen it a certain large older global software/hardware/services company I was with for quite a few years, I've seen it in government as well.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 11:57 AM
  #15  
TomServo92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by Vermillion06
That kind of stuff happens in a lot of really large organizations. The bigger a company or organization gets, the more international or regional divisions a company gets, the worse it becomes. I've seen it a certain large older global software/hardware/services company I was with for quite a few years, I've seen it in government as well.
Well, I work for one of the worlds largest corporations and we have alot of "across the fence" cooperation between business units. In fact, a sizable portion of the work that my group does isn't for the division we're in. I guess since I don't see that type of thing in my employer, I found it shocking to see it in Ford.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ecostang
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1661
Nov 3, 2022 08:50 PM
jc46002003
Repair and Service Help
70
Apr 15, 2016 03:00 PM
Mustang259
'10-14 Interior and Audio
74
Mar 25, 2016 04:27 PM
JonathonK
GT350
6
Sep 17, 2015 10:13 AM
DerekShiekhi
Ford Discussions
1
Jul 14, 2015 10:32 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:03 AM.