Superchargers
#22
#23
I would agree with the auto you would want to keep her about 4-5 psi ,whereas with the stick you can get a little more out of it...Clutch notwithstanding though =)..I don't expect mine to to last all that long and will upgrade to a centerforce or mcleod when the time comes
#24
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: July 12, 2005
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 525 is at the crank
"The new HO Intercooled ProCharger system for ‘05 Mustang GT’s produces a 65-70% power gain on stock motors running pump gas, with 8-9 psi of intercooled boost. This means stock motors produce 445+ RWHP, and are able to run well into the 11‘s with their typical 3,800 lb loaded weight." http://www.procharger.com/2005_mustang.shtml
With Upgrades Procharger is advertising of max posible gains of 850 hp in there Application Guide.
http://www.procharger.com/FORD/ford_auto.shtml
As for the Auto tranny I guess we wont really know until I break it!!
"The new HO Intercooled ProCharger system for ‘05 Mustang GT’s produces a 65-70% power gain on stock motors running pump gas, with 8-9 psi of intercooled boost. This means stock motors produce 445+ RWHP, and are able to run well into the 11‘s with their typical 3,800 lb loaded weight." http://www.procharger.com/2005_mustang.shtml
With Upgrades Procharger is advertising of max posible gains of 850 hp in there Application Guide.
http://www.procharger.com/FORD/ford_auto.shtml
As for the Auto tranny I guess we wont really know until I break it!!
#26
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#27
That brings up a good point about blower types. I think most tranny's have a torque rating, not HP. Procharger type blower make less torque but the same or more peak HP than positive displacement typeblowers. If you got an auto tranny a Procharger might be the better way to go. I like the low end torque but not at the expense of drivetrain. 445+ rwhp should be fine for the stock motor.
#28
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: July 12, 2005
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unfortunatly I will have to wait a little longer before I get the Supercharger since my truck is now in the shop with a thrown rod or mabey worse I might have a new engine purchase pending
#29
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: July 12, 2005
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by AnotherMustangMan@July 13, 2005, 10:51 AM
Haha, yeah in my optimism i also forgot about the full rollcage, tranny swap, beefed up rear axle/drive shaft, and im sure other stuff too.
Haha, yeah in my optimism i also forgot about the full rollcage, tranny swap, beefed up rear axle/drive shaft, and im sure other stuff too.
#30
i installed a saleen supercharger last week and dyno it. i got 358 hp and 362 tq to the wheels. it a was with their conservitive tune and stock air filter. also it was 98 degree weather. anyway i was disappointed with the torq numbers. i never saw anything 400 rwhp from. they claim 420rwtq which i think i'm missing. anyway very easy to install and great power 3000rpm+
#32
I have a car newbie question about this type of mod. Is this something you would just do for the race track? Or do any of you do it just for that extra kick at the pedal driving around?
This expensive of a mod is way beyond my reach probably until the car is paid in a few years, but I love reading about this stuff! Anyone have a video of a before/after of their Mustang with these installed? Audio would be nice.
This expensive of a mod is way beyond my reach probably until the car is paid in a few years, but I love reading about this stuff! Anyone have a video of a before/after of their Mustang with these installed? Audio would be nice.
#33
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: July 12, 2005
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For this kind of money I would have to say for racing, but the car will be a everyday driver and weekend racer.
I would'nt recommend opening it up on the street, tickets and insurance get expensive.
It will be alot of fun on the track until I can get a better car built.
I would'nt recommend opening it up on the street, tickets and insurance get expensive.
It will be alot of fun on the track until I can get a better car built.
#34
Originally posted by pmcarlino@July 17, 2005, 2:32 PM
i installed a saleen supercharger last week and dyno it. i got 358 hp and 362 tq to the wheels. it a was with their conservitive tune and stock air filter. also it was 98 degree weather. anyway i was disappointed with the torq numbers. i never saw anything 400 rwhp from. they claim 420rwtq which i think i'm missing. anyway very easy to install and great power 3000rpm+
i installed a saleen supercharger last week and dyno it. i got 358 hp and 362 tq to the wheels. it a was with their conservitive tune and stock air filter. also it was 98 degree weather. anyway i was disappointed with the torq numbers. i never saw anything 400 rwhp from. they claim 420rwtq which i think i'm missing. anyway very easy to install and great power 3000rpm+
#35
I'd say mostly track. A magazine compared the regular Saleen and the S/C. They where even until 40-50 mph because the S/C could not hook up. The Saleen has some massive tires too. I guess you could do some incredible passing up hills but after that maybe its not that streetable for the price.
#36
Originally posted by 1trickpony@July 18, 2005, 6:57 AM
The 400/420 numbers are at the crank, so 358/362 (.85 percent) at the wheels are a decent numbers.
The 400/420 numbers are at the crank, so 358/362 (.85 percent) at the wheels are a decent numbers.
#37
![Thumb](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/thumb.gif)
#40
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: July 12, 2005
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by subzero05@July 18, 2005, 2:45 PM
My Non I/C votech kit puts down 418 at the wheels.
My Non I/C votech kit puts down 418 at the wheels.