SLP's lose performance?
#1
SLP's lose performance?
So I installed my Loudmouths today and they sound great the only problem is I feel I lost some torque of the line, anyone else experience this or is it all just in my head? car is auto btw
#10
One thing I did notice was the fact that the car doesn't slow down as much when you let off the gas and let the engine brake for you. I now half to downshift while I am slowing down unless I want to use the brakes.
The sound isn't nearly as bad inside the car as it is outside the car. While cruising at highway speeds the drone isn't nearly as bad as it was in my 5.0 car or my 99 TA with the SLP dual dual muffler.
The sound isn't nearly as bad inside the car as it is outside the car. While cruising at highway speeds the drone isn't nearly as bad as it was in my 5.0 car or my 99 TA with the SLP dual dual muffler.
#11
You cant really prove it on a dyno because they dont start reading until 1500-2000......but the principle relies on when you remove the backpressue which existed with the stock setup you lose some low end torq but you will gain HP on the high RPM end....now you are going to pick up any HP with mufflers but with headers and o/r pipe you will
If you google it you will find some very detailed articles.
If you google it you will find some very detailed articles.
#14
You cannot really assume that if from one dyno sheet to another you lost or gained ~5 hp or tq is all that acurate. They should advertise the margin of error. I've never seen any two dyno sheets done the same day with the same exact conditions read exactly the same.
There was a post were the guys dyno showed a loss of 3 or 5 tq after installing the loudmouths, for whatever reason alot of people took it as the gospel.
We all know decreased back pressure can net higher top end HP but a loss of low end TQ, but just how much when all your doing is changing out a fairly decent flowing exhaust can for strait through pipes? I doubt very much it would be noticable at all if that were the only mod.
I'm not defending them just because I have them, I just think it's goofy that people believe they hurt performance more than any other strait through design, which almost all axle backs flow better than stock, however maginal.
There was a post were the guys dyno showed a loss of 3 or 5 tq after installing the loudmouths, for whatever reason alot of people took it as the gospel.
We all know decreased back pressure can net higher top end HP but a loss of low end TQ, but just how much when all your doing is changing out a fairly decent flowing exhaust can for strait through pipes? I doubt very much it would be noticable at all if that were the only mod.
I'm not defending them just because I have them, I just think it's goofy that people believe they hurt performance more than any other strait through design, which almost all axle backs flow better than stock, however maginal.
#15
I don't feel any difference from the flowmasters to the SLPs? (exhaust is stock otherwise). My guess, is that it's the sound that makes you think you are gaining or loosing power. I'm not really sure you could notice feel a 10HP difference even if it were a true 10hp/tq gain or loss, at least I probably couldn't.
#17
I felt some power loss when i first put mine on. After a few days, it came back as I assume the computer adjusted for the increased exhaust flow. But now that i have the Bamachip 91 race tune, it is much faster no matter what!
#18
Honestly though, I've never really read an article that offered a concrete reason as to why back pressure increases torque, nor has anybody ever been able satisfactorily explain the reason why back pressure enhances engine torque. IMO I rate it right up there with the myth of ram-air.
#20
Increased cylinder pressure, no appreciable parasitic horsepower loss, etc
Honestly though, I've never really read an article that offered a concrete reason as to why back pressure increases torque, nor has anybody ever been able satisfactorily explain the reason why back pressure enhances engine torque. IMO I rate it right up there with the myth of ram-air.
Honestly though, I've never really read an article that offered a concrete reason as to why back pressure increases torque, nor has anybody ever been able satisfactorily explain the reason why back pressure enhances engine torque. IMO I rate it right up there with the myth of ram-air.