GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Shaftmasters Inc is here to answer your driveshaft related questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #1  
shaftmasters's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: November 30, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Shaftmasters Inc is here to answer your driveshaft related questions

Hello Forum Members,

We are a new “Authorized Advertiser” on The Mustang Source Forums with over 40 years experience in driveshaft manufacturing and repair.

Shaftmasters Inc. manufactures 3.5” and 4” diameter single piece internal slip style aluminum driveshafts for 2005+ Mustangs. These shafts features the following:
  • 3.5” shaft features Heavy Duty .125 wall 6061-T6 aluminum tubing
  • 1330 Series “Spicer Life” solid non-greasable universal joints
  • Rated to 9800 RPM ½ critical speed and 5000 ft-lb of torsional yield
  • 3”-23 spline slip with almost 4” of spline engagement
  • V6 aluminum shaft weighs 17lbs. V8 aluminum shaft w/adapter plate weighs 18.5lbs.
  • V8 shafts are available with either an adapter plate or a replacement pinion flange
  • Internal sound deadener
We would like to let members know that out of all the Mustang replacement shafts we have sold we have not had a single complaint. We have not experienced UPS somehow damaging them in shipping and causing vibration. We have not had our adapter plate need to be rotated after installation in order to eliminate vibration. We have not had to suggest that our customers adjust their pinion angle in order to eliminate vibrations. What we have experienced are satisfied customers who say their vehicles are much smoother on acceleration and seem to “ramp-up” quicker.

Customer reviews of our shafts can be found at the following links:
3.5” Diameter:
http://www.mustangcollective.com/showthread.php?t=13602&highlight=shaftmasters

4” Diameter:
http://www.mustangforums.com/m_4086511/tm.htm
http://www.mustangcollective.com/showthread.php?t=13018

It has been our experience that an aluminum driveshaft with quality non-greasable universal joints will consistently balance better and run smoother than a steel driveshaft at the higher RPM’s produced by today’s overdrive transmissions.

All of our Mustang replacement shafts feature Free UPS Ground shipping to the continental US and are available at the following link:
http://www.shaftmasters.com/store/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=17&zenid=184123b6b 394001a1cc9a52f235ac79e

Or you can call us at 1-866-912-2004 to order.

Please do not hesitate to post your questions here or call us at the number above. We will do our best to answer any driveshaft related questions you may have.


Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 01:27 PM
  #2  
mark221's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 4, 2004
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
What are the advantages or disadvantages to using the adapter plate or the new flange? Why is the 4" DS cheaper than the 3.5"? Will the 4" fit with no mods to my manual Gt with long tube headers X-pipe and 3" exhaust?
Thanks,
Mark
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #3  
shaftmasters's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: November 30, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mark221
What are the advantages or disadvantages to using the adapter plate or the new flange? Why is the 4" DS cheaper than the 3.5"? Will the 4" fit with no mods to my manual Gt with long tube headers X-pipe and 3" exhaust?
Thanks,
Mark
Mark,
The advantage to using the adapter plate is ease of installation. We decided to offer shafts with a pinion flange because even though we have received no complaints about our adapter plate we know there have been other driveshaft marketers that have had vibration issues. So in order to ease people minds we decided to offer a shaft with a pinion flange. The disadvantages of a pinion flange is the fact that you have to reset the pinion bearing preload upon installation and if not done properly it can lead to major differential problems. As far as the 4" being cheaper than the 3.5", it is all a matter of component cost. 3.5" components cost us more than 4". We would like to make it clear that our "dollar amount" profit is the same on either 3.5" or 4". In other words even though the components for 3.5" cost us more, we still make the same profit off of either deisgn. As far as whether the 4" will fit your vehicle I can tell you that we have sold plenty of 4" GT shafts for factory original GT's and had no complaints, either manual or auto trans. If your exhaust and headers are larger than factory then you might want to take some measurements to ensure that you have clearance. Also, keep in mind that while the 3.5" is more expensive it does feature thicker wall tubing and is rated for higher RPM's and more Torsional Yield.
Thanks, David
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 05:43 PM
  #4  
LEO_06GT's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 24, 2006
Posts: 7,409
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Why is there a almost $100 difference between the V6 and V8 version?
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 11:00 PM
  #5  
soitsav6's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 29, 2006
Posts: 344
Likes: 1
Robert, welcome, I dealt with David when I got my ds a few months ago, still loving it and no problems, be prepared for more work. LOL
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 04:46 AM
  #6  
ford4v429's Avatar
legacy Tms Member
 
Joined: October 9, 2005
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 77
From: N.E. Ohio
Hi,
I pasted a reply in another thread last night, just noticed this question thread for driveshafts...just want to say up front looks like shaftmasters makes a good product, and anything that helps vibration will help everything last longer- the thing is often in magazine adds and dyno pulls you read of things like 20 hp gain with a lighter shaft...just was really interested in some technical specs on inertia/savings...thanks for any insight/corrections

Originally Posted by ford4v429
do you have any 1/4 mile time differences for the alum vs stock driveshafts? I still am 'always the skeptic' but cant see how it would take more than maybe 1hp to accelerate a small diameter piece of steel to 4500 rpm in 14 seconds...(my stock GT ran a best of 13.78 at 103, redlining 3rd gear thru the lights- 1.32:1 third= about 4500 driveshaft rpm)

is the 'WK squared' inertia number out there somewhere for stock and aluminum units? SURELY someone out there has got the numbers on these shafts...
inertia, rpm and time would give undisputable true horsepower numbers, but have yet to ever see any adverised...


edit- just for the heck of it, lets look at a rediculous 'driveshaft' :

a SOLID steel 4" bar 60" long accelerating from 0 to 4500 rpm in 14 seconds requires only about 3 ft-lb over that time to hit that rpm...if I did the math right...I'm tired, so definitely no guarantees there...

(3 ftlb*4500 rpm)/5252= about 2.5 hp peak thru the lights (HP tapers linear from zero at 0 mph to 2.5 at 100 mph). I'd venture to guess if solid 4" is 2.5 peak, the tube version is WAY under 1hp peak...

maybe Ive go the math all wrong, but Ive read claims of 20 hp savings and such from a relatively light piece of tubing accelerating to 4500 rpm in 14 seconds, and it just dont feel right to me...after running numbers for a solid steel 4" bar, now I'm really skeptical...is there someone out there that can convince me, show me where I messed up the math or whatnot...please

if the purpose is a better balanced/higher rpm shaft, then I can kinda see the draw to aftermarket shafts, but if its for acceleration it seems a kinda low return on investment to me...the 'save 20 hp' claims ive seen from some ads (not shaftmasters) are the ones that get me scratchin my head...

heres the formulas I grabbed:


INERTIA (WK2)
For Solid Cylinders: WK2 = .000681 pLD4
For Hollow: WK2 = .000681 pL (D24 - D14)
Where:
  • WK2 = lb. ft2
  • D1, D2, and L = in.
  • p = lb. in3
  • p (aluminun) = .0924
  • p (bronze) = .320
  • p (cast iron) = .260
  • p (steel) = .282
ACCELERATING TORQUE
For rotating objects: T = (WK2 )∆ N / 308t
Where:
  • T = Torque required (lb- ft)
  • WK2 = Total Inertia of load to be accelerated
  • ∆N = Change in speed (rpm)
  • t = Time to accelerate load (sec)
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 05:05 AM
  #7  
shaftmasters's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: November 30, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by LEO_06GT
Why is there a almost $100 difference between the V6 and V8 version?
Leo,
The difference in price reflects the cost of the adapter plate that is necessary for V8 applications.
Thanks, David
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 05:25 AM
  #8  
dustindu4's Avatar
9 is not my lucky number.
 
Joined: March 12, 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 1
ha ha he said shaftmaster
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 05:56 AM
  #9  
shaftmasters's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: November 30, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ford4v429
Hi,
I pasted a reply in another thread last night, just noticed this question thread for driveshafts...just want to say up front looks like shaftmasters makes a good product, and anything that helps vibration will help everything last longer- the thing is often in magazine adds and dyno pulls you read of things like 20 hp gain with a lighter shaft...just was really interested in some technical specs on inertia/savings...thanks for any insight/corrections

[/size][/font]
Tim,
We agree that some of the claims being made out there are hard to swallow. We do not feel comfortable making these claims ourselves. We do however have a few customers that say after installing our driveshaft they then proceeded to run their best times ever. Whether or not this is a direct result of HP improvement or simply the driver having more confidence in his vehicle is an open question.

As far as numbers go, we currently have a V6 3.5" diameter shaft being installed and tested by forum member "Billybix76". Watch for his post showing before and after Dyno results, they should be coming sometime shortly after this friday.

By all means the purpose is for a better balanced/higher rpm driveshaft. Also to replace what we consider to be a flawed original design. As of right now these vehicles are still relatively new but we have had customers say that their OEM driveshaft has vibrated from day one. As time goes by there are going to be more and more replacements due to necessity as opposed to performance improvement.

Seeing as our 3.5" and 4" shafts are equal in weight to each other and also equal in weight to the shafts offered by other companies. We know that our shafts perform as well as any aluminum mustang shaft on the market. When you also consider the fact that we have had not a single complaint (i.e. vibration, installation issues, shipping damage etc.) we feel confident in making the claims that we do.

Thanks, David
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 06:08 AM
  #10  
Jager's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 27, 2007
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: FL
Any thoughts on developing a Carbon Fiber driveshaft for better balance/higher rpm?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 06:51 AM
  #11  
shaftmasters's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: November 30, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jager
Any thoughts on developing a Carbon Fiber driveshaft for better balance/higher rpm?
Our aluminum shafts have in our minds proven themselves to be more than capable of handling the RPM's and with high performance solid universal joints we feel the balance is impecable. Therefore, we have no plans to develop a carbon fiber shaft.
Thanks, David
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 06:57 AM
  #12  
tmcolegr's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 29, 2004
Posts: 634
Likes: 2
I am not a skeptic but I am let's say I'm very cautious about claims of no vibration with V8s and automatic transmissions. How many 3.5" aluminum shafts with an adapter plate, in a V8 with auto transmission have you sold?

Don't take this wrong, but it's easy to claim that there are no vibration complaints if you haven't sold any.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 07:14 AM
  #13  
05YellowGT's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: February 24, 2005
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 22
From: Delray Beach , FL
Hey Tom , haven't seen you around here much lately. I see you switched from the Diablo to the SCT , is that because Scott left them. He's now at another place a little south of here , since Steeda lost their tuner Sam , I may start taking my car to him down there ...
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 07:18 AM
  #14  
tmcolegr's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 29, 2004
Posts: 634
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by 05YellowGT
Hey Tom , haven't seen you around here much lately. I see you switched from the Diablo to the SCT , is that because Scott left them. He's now at another place a little south of here , since Steeda lost their tuner Sam , I may start taking my car to him down there ...

Quite frankly..........Yes

Very poor product support for Diablosport in my area. I am currently using Justin Starkey @ VMP Tuning and JDM - both use SCT.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 08:03 AM
  #15  
shaftmasters's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: November 30, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tmcolegr
I am not a skeptic but I am let's say I'm very cautious about claims of no vibration with V8s and automatic transmissions. How many 3.5" aluminum shafts with an adapter plate, in a V8 with auto transmission have you sold?

Don't take this wrong, but it's easy to claim that there are no vibration complaints if you haven't sold any.
Tom,
As of today we have sold 20 of the aluminum shafts for the V8 with auto.
We have also sold 45 of the V6 shafts. We also manufacture aluminum shafts for Nissan 240SX and Toyota Supra MKIII and have had no issues with vibration there either. In addition we manufacture custom aluminum shafts for street rods, strip cars, pickup trucks, vans etc. All total we do manufacture 100's of aluminum driveshafts every year.
Thanks for asking,
David

ps- if you like you can click on the links in our original posts to read reviews.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 08:32 AM
  #16  
tmcolegr's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 29, 2004
Posts: 634
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by shaftmasters
Tom,
if you like you can click on the links in our original posts to read reviews.
I clicked on the links you provided - they are all V6s not V8s.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #17  
shaftmasters's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: November 30, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tmcolegr
I clicked on the links you provided - they are all V6s not V8s.
Tom,
I will try to get in touch with some of our past V8 customers and see if they can provide some feedback. To be frank we consider no news to be good news when we sell a driveshaft. It is very rare that a customer will call up and let us know how pleased they are. But if they had a problem we would be the 1st to know. In the meantime we are waiting to hear back on an offer we made to forum member "LEO_06GT" about installing and testing a V8 for us so we could have a forum member testify.
Thanks, David
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 11:21 AM
  #18  
tom281's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
How bout an offer to me, I'm just 2 hours south of you, Leo is on the west coast.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 12:18 PM
  #19  
shaftmasters's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: November 30, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tom281
How bout an offer to me, I'm just 2 hours south of you, Leo is on the west coast.
Tom,
Leo was the first to approach us. If he decides not to accept we will definitely make you an offer.
Thanks, David
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #20  
tom281's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
OK well let me know, it would be a test on a supercharged GT.....
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:51 AM.