Recent mod

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 18, 2005 | 04:58 PM

fin1

Thread Starter

10th Fastest 05+ 1/4mi Time On TMS

Joined: February 6, 2005

Posts: 120

Likes: 0

Just got her back today.

Jun 18, 2005 | 04:59 PM

fin1

Thread Starter

10th Fastest 05+ 1/4mi Time On TMS

Joined: February 6, 2005

Posts: 120

Likes: 0

two more...

Jun 18, 2005 | 05:02 PM

Captmojo

Bullitt Member

Joined: February 22, 2005

Posts: 280

Likes: 0

AWESOME

I bet she snaps your head back on take off

What was the $$$ for the Procharger and to install?

Jun 18, 2005 | 05:06 PM

fin1

Thread Starter

10th Fastest 05+ 1/4mi Time On TMS

Joined: February 6, 2005

Posts: 120

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by fin1@June 18, 2005, 7:02 PM
two more...

Quoted post

Parts & labor: $6,551.08
Included a new fuel pump.

Jun 18, 2005 | 05:26 PM

2Slack

Mach 1 Member

Joined: August 16, 2004

Posts: 653

Likes: 0

Wow! How does it compare to stock?

Jun 18, 2005 | 05:37 PM

WERKED 66

Cobra Member

Joined: November 1, 2004

Posts: 1,185

Likes: 0

Jun 18, 2005 | 05:39 PM

PeterPienaar

Bullitt Member

Joined: September 25, 2004

Posts: 319

Likes: 0

hp? tq?

Jun 18, 2005 | 06:01 PM

orange04cobra

V6 Member

Joined: March 10, 2005

Posts: 92

Likes: 0

how many pounds of boost are you runnin?

Jun 18, 2005 | 06:21 PM

Dusty1

Mach 1 Member

Joined: April 28, 2005

Posts: 521

Likes: 0

Dyno Dyno Dyno!!! :worship: :worship: :worship: :worship:

Jun 18, 2005 | 06:27 PM

#10

Zc527

FR500 Member

Joined: October 20, 2004

Posts: 3,196

Likes: 0

man! thats alot of $!

Jun 18, 2005 | 06:31 PM

#11

fin1

Thread Starter

10th Fastest 05+ 1/4mi Time On TMS

Joined: February 6, 2005

Posts: 120

Likes: 0

It's rated at 9psi but when dyno'd we hit 8.5 psi at red line (6000rpm). I'm sure 9 is obtainable over this. She was run on a loaded dyno (Mustang dyno), which is differented than an unloaded one (Dynojet). The shop I use preferes the loaded dyno since it better simulates what the engine has to push. The numbers published by ATI are Dynojet numbers. Here are the Mustang dyno numbers:

ProCharger Loaded (@ car weight) dyno (rw):
hp: 372
tq: 335

Stock Loaded (@ car weight) dyno (rw):
hp: 245
tq: 255

This converts to about 420 rwph Dynojet. I don't know the tq conversion. We stoped at @ 6000 rpm but she's got more hp between 6000 & 6300 since it didn't appear to peak yet. We didn't want to abuse the engine and since I'm looking to keep this for years to come it was not important to run it to over 6000 rpm.

Jun 18, 2005 | 06:35 PM

#12

fin1

Thread Starter

10th Fastest 05+ 1/4mi Time On TMS

Joined: February 6, 2005

Posts: 120

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by Zc527@June 18, 2005, 8:30 PM
man! thats alot of $!

Quoted post

Keep in mind this includes dyno time, custom tune time & gauge installation.

For the blower and install only, it came to $5,280.

Jun 18, 2005 | 06:39 PM

#13

Dusty1

Mach 1 Member

Joined: April 28, 2005

Posts: 521

Likes: 0

Don't you need forged internals to hand that kind of raw HP?

420 rwph....I've got chills down my spine!

Jun 19, 2005 | 04:38 AM

#14

2005RedGT

Cobra Member

Joined: November 13, 2004

Posts: 1,431

Likes: 0

Can you get a movie of the engine bay, during idle and revs ?

-Bryan

Jun 19, 2005 | 07:28 AM

#15

dustindu4

9 is not my lucky number.

Joined: March 12, 2004

Posts: 3,663

Likes: 1

420 rwhp = 494 HP

That's Shelby territory

Jun 19, 2005 | 10:45 AM

#16

justgreat

GT Member

Joined: May 22, 2004

Posts: 186

Likes: 0

stock loaded was 245 hp...so the parasitic loss was at least 55hp? now that's what i find significant. looks like you got a quality installation. jackg 90seville 97k

Jun 19, 2005 | 10:56 AM

#17

Wicked Game

Member

Joined: June 13, 2005

Posts: 24

Likes: 0

Definitely some testicular fortitude to kiss that warranty goodbye. Oh well, I'm sure the car is going to be a lot more fun with the blower. Good luck with it.