Question for those with Hurst 5-Speed
#1
Question for those with Hurst 5-Speed
I have a new Mustang and I installed the Hurst 5-Speed- it seems to take forever for the gears to mesh when changing gears. We're talking about a complete second for an upshift! If this normal? I have no binding, and it shift quickly with the engine turned off, but while driving, no matter how much pressure I apply to the shifter, it only moves so far, then you wait, then it slides into the new gear. Weird or normal??
I have driven a lot of transaxle cars that upshift as fast as you can move the shift lever.
Is the Tremec tranny just slow-shifting in general?
Thanks for any input.
I have driven a lot of transaxle cars that upshift as fast as you can move the shift lever.
Is the Tremec tranny just slow-shifting in general?
Thanks for any input.
#2
Hurst Shifter
No problems with my Hurst short throw shifter since the day I installed it. It almost shifts too quick for me-had to learn to drive all over again. The only thing holding me back now is my ability to engage the clutch (5 years as a paratrooper/green beret did a number on my knees).
#6
Originally Posted by SurfnSoCal
downshifting in to first if you are going over 20mph or so can take a second...
#7
Originally Posted by helicfii
I have a new Mustang and I installed the Hurst 5-Speed- it seems to take forever for the gears to mesh when changing gears. We're talking about a complete second for an upshift! If this normal? I have no binding, and it shift quickly with the engine turned off, but while driving, no matter how much pressure I apply to the shifter, it only moves so far, then you wait, then it slides into the new gear. Weird or normal??
I have driven a lot of transaxle cars that upshift as fast as you can move the shift lever.
Is the Tremec tranny just slow-shifting in general?
Thanks for any input.
I have driven a lot of transaxle cars that upshift as fast as you can move the shift lever.
Is the Tremec tranny just slow-shifting in general?
Thanks for any input.
mine is EXACTLY as you describe, and all of them are like this.... I just think some people dont shift hard enough to notice it. But the other ones I have tried to the same thing. It is because the Shifter is bolted to the body of the car, not the tranny, so when the tranny moves under load, the shifter doesnt because its bolted to the body, and so it doesnt line up right. thats why it shifts fine with the car off or still.
#8
Originally Posted by emperorjordan
mine is EXACTLY as you describe, and all of them are like this.... I just think some people dont shift hard enough to notice it. But the other ones I have tried to the same thing. It is because the Shifter is bolted to the body of the car, not the tranny, so when the tranny moves under load, the shifter doesnt because its bolted to the body, and so it doesnt line up right. thats why it shifts fine with the car off or still.
I have seen stiffer motor mounts and a trans stiffening set-up that has a bar going between the two front lower A-arms, that has two rods that rise up and bolt to the the trans bellhousing- I wonder if that would help?
#10
Don't mean to hijack the thread. I just got my Hurst Shifter, should I use the red bushings that came with it or use the ones from my stock shifter? I have read that alot of people have reused thier stock ones, pros and cons?
#11
Mach 1 Member
They are NOT all like that. Mine shifts perfectly, no matter how hard I'm into it. It will engage as quickly as I can get it into gear. Several trips to the strip and under that load it didn't shift or engage any slower than just driving around town normally. Something is definitely not right. Sorry to burst your bubble...
#12
Cobra Member
Join Date: August 16, 2005
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Notching shifting. My complaint since the get go. Some times I get a smooth shift, others not. I complained early on and the local dealer service manager let me take a new 06 off the lot and test drive it ... same as my 05.
I think the shifter design was a bad decision on Fords part. I have talked to engineering tech's at TREMEC and the word is Ford made them do it this way, rather than a conventional tail shaft mount arrangement. But I hear Corvettes have similar complaint with the same design. This design concept seems to be a new trend because others are following suit. Not sure what the benefit is (maybe less stick vibration), but what ever it is (I'll take the stick vibration any day), the notchy shifting sure cancels it.
The inherent throttle lag does not help the situation because the RPM's don't drop down quick enough on the up shifts, hence everything is really jerky except when you put the hammer down.
If the tunnel mount is the culprit, maybe softer there is better. That shifter rod has to rotate a very precise angle to hit the gates right, a hair off and what you see is what you get.
I think the shifter design was a bad decision on Fords part. I have talked to engineering tech's at TREMEC and the word is Ford made them do it this way, rather than a conventional tail shaft mount arrangement. But I hear Corvettes have similar complaint with the same design. This design concept seems to be a new trend because others are following suit. Not sure what the benefit is (maybe less stick vibration), but what ever it is (I'll take the stick vibration any day), the notchy shifting sure cancels it.
The inherent throttle lag does not help the situation because the RPM's don't drop down quick enough on the up shifts, hence everything is really jerky except when you put the hammer down.
If the tunnel mount is the culprit, maybe softer there is better. That shifter rod has to rotate a very precise angle to hit the gates right, a hair off and what you see is what you get.
#13
Originally Posted by 1SG
Don't mean to hijack the thread. I just got my Hurst Shifter, should I use the red bushings that came with it or use the ones from my stock shifter? I have read that alot of people have reused thier stock ones, pros and cons?
#14
The remote shifter is Ford's answer to the previous generation's problem of the shifter being too far forward. Ever drive a Cobra with a stock shifter? You need ape arms to reach 3rd gear. The flaw was so obvious one has to wonder how anyone at SVT could have driven the car and thought that that was acceptable. I for one think the current design is quite nice, especially with a Saleen short shift kit.
#15
Originally Posted by 65sohc
The remote shifter is Ford's answer to the previous generation's problem of the shifter being too far forward. Ever drive a Cobra with a stock shifter? You need ape arms to reach 3rd gear. The flaw was so obvious one has to wonder how anyone at SVT could have driven the car and thought that that was acceptable. I for one think the current design is quite nice, especially with a Saleen short shift kit.
#16
Originally Posted by 1SG
Don't mean to hijack the thread. I just got my Hurst Shifter, should I use the red bushings that came with it or use the ones from my stock shifter? I have read that alot of people have reused thier stock ones, pros and cons?
Also- don't forget the thread locker on the 2 upper shift handle bolts. I blue-torqued mine without putting any thread locker on them, and after about 500 miles, the they started to back out and the handle almost fell off!
....shifting faster every day!
#17
Originally Posted by helicfii
Use the red ones from Hurst- I have no vibration at all with them. I can't imagine paying all that money for a Hurst and then having to use the factory bushings- you're missing out on the whole package!
Also- don't forget the thread locker on the 2 upper shift handle bolts. I blue-torqued mine without putting any thread locker on them, and after about 500 miles, the they started to back out and the handle almost fell off!
....shifting faster every day!
Also- don't forget the thread locker on the 2 upper shift handle bolts. I blue-torqued mine without putting any thread locker on them, and after about 500 miles, the they started to back out and the handle almost fell off!
....shifting faster every day!
#18
I think I've got my shifting problem sorted out. Since this is my first drive by wire engine, I overlooked the obvious:
The reason it takes forever for my car to sync the gears on upshifts is because my tune causes the RPM to hang right where it is, when I release the throttle. This is especially apparent when I shift at high revs. Since the RPM's don't come down during the first 2 seconds, the synchros are in a frenzy trying to get everything synched-up when I upshift.
The car shifts fast (like right through butter) when I am downshifting and I match revs, or if I wait for the engine RPM to drop prior to shifting.
I need a new tune that will not cause the RPM to hang so long when I get off the gas. I have no idea why C&L would have this in their performance tune- it makes no sense at all in a performance car.
This car needs engine braking.
The reason it takes forever for my car to sync the gears on upshifts is because my tune causes the RPM to hang right where it is, when I release the throttle. This is especially apparent when I shift at high revs. Since the RPM's don't come down during the first 2 seconds, the synchros are in a frenzy trying to get everything synched-up when I upshift.
The car shifts fast (like right through butter) when I am downshifting and I match revs, or if I wait for the engine RPM to drop prior to shifting.
I need a new tune that will not cause the RPM to hang so long when I get off the gas. I have no idea why C&L would have this in their performance tune- it makes no sense at all in a performance car.
This car needs engine braking.