GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Performance advantage of "fatter" tires?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5/10/07 | 05:57 PM
  #1  
Rebel73's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2005
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Lost Angels
Performance advantage of "fatter" tires?

We all know that big meats on the back of our ponies look kick-***, but do they really have a significant effect on the performance? Do they result in better acceleration? Handling? etc?

Would the same car with 285s out back get up and going faster than one with 255s ? I currently have 255s all around and want to know if it's worth it to beef up the back for a reason other than looks.

thanks
Old 5/10/07 | 06:10 PM
  #2  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 22, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
More sidewall (and presumably more flexible, too), and a wider contact patch, is much better for forward acceleration traction. The rubber compound is also important. For example, my new M&H tires are narrower than my previous Nittos, but slightly taller, and much softer. They hook dramatically better than the Nittos ever did. But, they wouldn't be all that great for corner carving.
Old 5/10/07 | 06:44 PM
  #3  
st06vert's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 5, 2006
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
don,
any chance for a ride a long at the q to experience your fast car?
Old 5/10/07 | 06:46 PM
  #4  
Bullitt995's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2006
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
It's about traction.
Old 5/10/07 | 08:03 PM
  #5  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,201
Likes: 17
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by Rebel73
We all know that big meats on the back of our ponies look kick-***, but do they really have a significant effect on the performance? Do they result in better acceleration? Handling? etc?

Would the same car with 285s out back get up and going faster than one with 255s ? I currently have 255s all around and want to know if it's worth it to beef up the back for a reason other than looks.

thanks
Are you talking solely forward thrust or are you including the twisties as well? If you make no other change than to add 285's to the rear (with I might add, the proper sized rim - none of that fitting anything over a 255 to the stock rims crap) you will increase understeer as well, which will need to be balanced out with some suspension tuning if your inclined to do so.
Old 5/10/07 | 11:06 PM
  #6  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 22, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by st06vert
don,
any chance for a ride a long at the q to experience your fast car?
I can't run it all out with a passenger in the car. Anything quicker than 8.50, and they cut your armband and fine you $50. My wife already did that once... d'oh.
Old 5/11/07 | 10:19 AM
  #7  
Rebel73's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2005
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Lost Angels
Originally Posted by bob
Are you talking solely forward thrust or are you including the twisties as well? If you make no other change than to add 285's to the rear (with I might add, the proper sized rim - none of that fitting anything over a 255 to the stock rims crap) you will increase understeer as well, which will need to be balanced out with some suspension tuning if your inclined to do so.
Bob, what would be the proper wheel size for a 285? Would a 18 x 9 or 18 x 9.5 fit the bill?
Old 5/11/07 | 10:49 AM
  #8  
Lowe!'s Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2004
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
I have 18x10s for my 285s, and I think it looks perfect. However, I believe the shelby GT500 uses a 18x9.5 at all 4 corners w/ 255s in front and 285s in back. The 18x9 rim works great for the front 255s.
Old 5/11/07 | 01:56 PM
  #9  
RadBOSS's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 16, 2005
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
From: Central Coast, CA
Its all about contact patch. More improves braking, accelleration and cornering. Depending on power, staggerd size may or may not do you any good. Higher powered cars neen more contact patch on the drive wheels. Other limitations are front and rear wheel well obstructions.

For BFG G-Force P285/40R18 recommended rim width is 9.5 - 11.0. For other manufacturers of this size, very likely the same rim width recommendation
Old 5/11/07 | 11:09 PM
  #10  
kevinb120's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 3
Still depends on the tread pattern and compound too.
Old 5/12/07 | 12:22 AM
  #11  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,201
Likes: 17
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by Rebel73
Bob, what would be the proper wheel size for a 285? Would a 18 x 9 or 18 x 9.5 fit the bill?

18x9.5 to 18x11 (285/40R18)

http://www.bfgoodrichtires.com/catalog/tuner/14.html

Since BFG does alot of tuner sizes and the tire data is pretty standard for most manufacturers (except probably max pressure and max load) the spec tables can be pretty handy when determing wheel size. The notes below the table also has some good info (like the effect that rim width has on tread width and proper inflation pressures for high speed driving as well as the resulting loss in load carrying capacity)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
roushcollection
Auto Shows and Events
0
7/28/15 03:08 PM
MRGTX
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
5
7/21/15 03:08 PM
AMWill
Vendor Showcase
12
7/20/15 09:40 AM



Quick Reply: Performance advantage of "fatter" tires?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 AM.