GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Just got dyno numbers!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2007 | 02:11 PM
  #1  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Just got dyno numbers!!!!

My dyno numbers are 293rwhp and 313 rear wheel torque!!! My mods are C&L Racer,Brenspeed 93 Octane Tune,3:73's,Steeda CMDP's,and Motoblue UDP's. I don't have baseline numbers but I should be at 255-260rwhp stock so I gained 33rwhp which is about 40 crank hp gain. It was a hot day today so I am sure I would be over 300rwhp with cooler conditions.And the gears show maybe 5-10rwhp less since they make your car rev to higher rpm's.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 02:40 PM
  #2  
tom281's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
Good numbers.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 02:55 PM
  #3  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Thanks,my dad just drove it and he said when he dropped it down from 5th to 4th,it launched like a rocket on the freeway.And he said when he gives it alittle gas,it smokes the tires.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 02:56 PM
  #4  
TillmanSpeed's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: January 11, 2007
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Aston, PA
Not bad at all!... what was the temperature out today? Was the car hot when it showed those numbers... I'll be you got another 20RWHP unaccounted for with temperature, and gears if it was over 85 out.

CR
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 03:03 PM
  #5  
superman112's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 12, 2004
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Nice numbers.. glad everything is going well so far. So what's the next mod?? I will be getting mine on a Dyno on Tuesday (Thanks Tillman)
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 03:26 PM
  #6  
AFBLUE's Avatar
Dethroned Nascar Guru
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 2
What type of dyno was it? Manual or auto?
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 03:50 PM
  #7  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
It is manual,the dyno was a dynojet. Also,my parents just took me out on a test drive in it. Holy Crap!!! The tires still spin in 2nd!!! Also the exhaust is noticably louder. Its alot faster. Next Mod... Quarter Mile Trip...
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 04:14 PM
  #8  
jedikd's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2004
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Nice numbers. I don't get it though, are you old enough to drive it?
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 04:31 PM
  #9  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Well my parents drive it,I just posted the numbers.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 05:20 PM
  #10  
69_gt500's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 8, 2006
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Tewksbury, MA
Nice numbers, but that would be a tease for me, putting on all those mods and not being able to drive it.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 06:57 PM
  #11  
steevr's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 6, 2005
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
If it helps for comparison, my stock numbers on a dynojet were 263rwhp and 286rwtq.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 07:54 PM
  #12  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
I would say if my car was stock yesterday and I got a baseline pull then, I would have 255-260rwhp since it was pretty hot yesterday. So I would say the Tune and intake added 25rwhp,and the CMDP's and pullies added 10-15rwhp.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 08:09 PM
  #13  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by 69_gt500
Nice numbers, but that would be a tease for me, putting on all those mods and not being able to drive it.


Me,as a passenger, it was a thrill ride.
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 06:04 AM
  #14  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by TillmanSpeed
Not bad at all!... what was the temperature out today? Was the car hot when it showed those numbers... I'll be you got another 20RWHP unaccounted for with temperature, and gears if it was over 85 out.

CR


Tillmanspeed,it has been very humid lately so that probably lowered the numbers considerably.
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 08:25 AM
  #15  
TacoBill's Avatar
 
Joined: September 23, 2004
Posts: 10,037
Likes: 5
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by mustangfan123
Tillmanspeed,it has been very humid lately so that probably lowered the numbers considerably.
If the dyno numbers posted are SAE Corrected, the outside temp and humidity are irrelevant. Am I correct?
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 08:59 AM
  #16  
The Reverend's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 28, 2006
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Correct. It is all relative.
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #17  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
So that means humidity and temp have a big effect on hp?
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 12:42 PM
  #18  
ScottM's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 20, 2006
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mustangfan123
So that means humidity and temp have a big effect on hp?
They do have an effect, but as far as dyno's go, if you look at the corrected numbers, it takes that in to consideration. Basically, it doesn't matter what the temp and stuff is on a dyno assuming your looking at corrected numbers. That's what corrected numbers mean, they correct for outside temps so everyone should theoritically have the same conditions. Now if you only pay attention to uncorrected numbers, then yes, outside conditions play a role, at least that's how I understand it.

Originally Posted by TacoBill
If the dyno numbers posted are SAE Corrected, the outside temp and humidity are irreverent. Am I correct?
Do you mean irrelevant?

Sorry, I couldn't help it!
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 12:54 PM
  #19  
TacoBill's Avatar
 
Joined: September 23, 2004
Posts: 10,037
Likes: 5
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by ScottM
Do you mean irrelevant?

Sorry, I couldn't help it!

You got me, Scott!


Yes, back to SAE Corrected, if you were to dyno your car in the lofty climate of Southern CA, then again in the high elevation of Denver, CO, and finally in humid Orlando, FL, you should yield the same HP and TQ numbers (assuming all the Dyno's were calibrated the same).

That's why when we all compare HP and TQ values of certain mods, we're all on the same page by using the Correction Factor (SAE).
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 01:23 PM
  #20  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Oh ok, I get it now.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:14 PM.