GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Hurst billet shifter exists

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 02:03 AM
  #41  
Den's Avatar
Den
GT Member
 
Joined: July 22, 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, IL
Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
Hope this doesn't sound like a dumb question. But why not just simply re-use the factory sound deadening material for reducing NVH
Not a dumb question. Since the new shifter has a different body than the stock shifter the factory sound deadening simply wont fit around the new shifter. Sometimes you can modify it to fit depending on the shifter. The love the MGW because it comes with its own sound deadening that fits perfect.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #42  
WaltM's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 9, 2007
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
m05fastbackGT;

If you're concerned about NVH, the original "comp" shifter is close to the factory design. I've had mine for 5 months and have no additional NVH.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #43  
SONICBOOST's Avatar
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 3
From: Temecula,CA
Is the new hurst out yet?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 02:12 PM
  #44  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,645
Likes: 2,511
From: Carnegie, PA
Originally Posted by WaltM
m05fastbackGT;

If you're concerned about NVH, the original "comp" shifter is close to the factory design. I've had mine for 5 months and have no additional NVH.
Being as the original "comp" shifter comes standard on the Shelby GT. That's also what I thought as well. Unless somehow, the folks at Shelby Auto's. modify the factory sound deadening material.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 02:28 PM
  #45  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,645
Likes: 2,511
From: Carnegie, PA
Although I'm very interested in purchasing the original "comp" shifter. I'm also very concerned with missing gears, due to what others have complained about Hurst's (notchy) shifter design.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #46  
n8rfastback's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 25, 2007
Posts: 2,416
Likes: 1
i have the comp and there is no additional NVH whatsoever

it is built very well and i have not missed a shift yet.....

definately better and easier than the stocker
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 10:02 PM
  #47  
landarch05's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: January 19, 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
No the new Hurst Billet Comp/Plus has not been shipped yet I have been told March.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 07:47 AM
  #48  
SONICBOOST's Avatar
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 3
From: Temecula,CA
delete
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 07:48 AM
  #49  
SONICBOOST's Avatar
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 3
From: Temecula,CA
Thanks Jay, I will be looking forward to it...
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 07:58 AM
  #50  
anthony05gt's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 12, 2006
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by n8rfastback
i have the comp and there is no additional NVH whatsoever

it is built very well and i have not missed a shift yet.....

definately better and easier than the stocker
That's because your car is basicly stock. Once you get up over 400 rwhp the drivetrain will twist more and interfere with shifts at high rpm's. This rarely happens on lower hp applications. MGW is the only company that has torsion mounts on the shifter's remote mounting beam which I am convinced is the reason it works so well. Go MGW, you won't regret it.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #51  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,645
Likes: 2,511
From: Carnegie, PA
I'm really caught in the middle, between the Hurst "comp" shifter, and the MGW.

Although MGW is the better overall designed shifter. I'm running N/A with just simple bolt-ons, and have no intentions of upgrading to forced induction.

I'm also not very knowledgeable, when it comes to adjusting the amount of short throw stops/turns.

I suppose this is one of the reasons, why I prefer the Hurst over the MGW. is because of it's simplicity, without all the angle/short throw adjustments required.

Plus I also really like the retro design/theme as well.


Even though I enjoy spirited driving, and like opening my Stang up once in awhile. I do not race my car at all, however I wouldn't mind taking it to the track, just to see how well it performs.

So my question is. Would the Hurst "comp" shifter, provide enough stability to prevent missed shifts. Or does the MGW, provide more thorough, and precise stability.

Anyway, thanks for all your feedback and support in advance.



Rocky
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 07:39 PM
  #52  
subzero05's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 7, 2005
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
I have had the comp plus in the car for well over a year now and my car is blown. Haven't had any issues with missed shifts.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 05:45 AM
  #53  
302svt's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 26, 2006
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Any updates on the shifter.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 02:06 PM
  #54  
subzero05's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 7, 2005
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
we are assembling the initial run on the shifters now and should be shipping them out shortly
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 07:14 PM
  #55  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,645
Likes: 2,511
From: Carnegie, PA
What I fail to understand is. What's the purpose behind the adjustable stops, being as the drivetrain already has internal stops built in.

I also agree with Anthony's post that mentioned. the solid remote beam is too rigid, and has no give. Meanwhile, if the shifter is mounted to both the transmission, and structural body. the drivetrain still ends up twisting under torque, even though the vehicle's chassis clearly does not.

Therefore. It would seem if a billet shifter is going to be used. It should also be paired with torque limiters, and K-member brace, in order to prevent the transmission from twisting as well. Otherwise why bother upgrading to a billet shifter to begin with. Just my $.02
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #56  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,645
Likes: 2,511
From: Carnegie, PA
I was almost ready to pull the trigger on the Hurst. Until I spoke with Hurst's tech support dept. And then with George from MGW.

Needless to say, after comparing my phone conversations. The Hurst tech rep didn't seem very interested in answering my questions, nor was able to provide technical details about their product, other than it's design is similar to the stock unit, with the exception of being a short throw shifter.

However on the other hand, George from MGW was very informative, polite, and answered each of my technical questions, in a very professional, and precise manner. In fact. I could even tell how passionate he was about his product, when describing which materials each component is designed from, and how each part must be inspected/tested, before being shipped to the customer.

By the time it was all said and done. He must have spent like over 45 min. on the phone with me. And after asking him, if he recommended going with the adjustable stop kit. His response, was don't even waste my money, as it's really not necessary. Thanks to the internal stops built into the transmission. Now that's what I call trustworthiness and excellent customer support.

That being said. I don't mind paying an additional $100.00, when it concerns a superior quality product, along with great customer service to back it up.

As far as I'm concerned. The MGW is definitely worth every penny, and then some
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 08:03 AM
  #57  
302svt's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 26, 2006
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Bump
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 08:21 AM
  #58  
RKNMACH's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 10, 2006
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: NOVA
Rocky,
How do you like the MGW now that you've had it for a few weeks?

Chris
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 08:23 AM
  #59  
RKNMACH's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 10, 2006
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: NOVA
Never mind, I see that is a future mod. I'm thinking that way myself.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2008 | 03:16 PM
  #60  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,645
Likes: 2,511
From: Carnegie, PA
Hey Chris,

Although I don't have the MGW just yet. I have no doubt that I'm going to enjoy those nice crispy short throws, and adjustability features. As I'm sure you will as well.


Rocky
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 PM.