GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

hmmm would 295/35/18 hurt my performance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 03:56 PM
  #1  
Baginoman2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
I was planning on getting the BFgoodrich g-Force T/A KDW, with 295/35/18 in the rear, and 255/40/18 in the front...now would this be hurting my performance? Would i have to re adjust my speedometer?

thankyou
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 04:03 PM
  #2  
hawgman's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: March 30, 2005
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
http://www.discounttire.com/dtcs/infoTireMath.dos

Speedo will be off by a little but nothing drastic that couldn't wait until your next dyno trip to adjust.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 04:12 PM
  #3  
Baginoman2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
how about my performance? will i slow down?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #4  
Baginoman2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
anybody else?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 07:46 PM
  #5  
cobalt's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2006
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
I've heard from 2 sources out here with quality tires in the rear that if you want to go wider than 285, you might as well go to drag tires at the track. If you are constantly racing people from 0-60, or from a stand still, then maybe 295 would be great. Then you'd want control arm relocation kits if your lowered. Erik
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 08:59 PM
  #6  
emperorjordan's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 14, 2005
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
I am going 305/35/18 in back on mustang tuning deep dish bullits when I do it. I dont think there is a performance hit as long as the wheel weight is same or less than stock, and the overall diameter doesnt get bigger. The bigger the over all diameter gets, the higher it gears your car, meaning it lets you go faster, but you get there slower.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 09:34 PM
  #7  
Baginoman2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(emperorjordan @ April 23, 2006, 10:02 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I am going 305/35/18 in back on mustang tuning deep dish bullits when I do it. I dont think there is a performance hit as long as the wheel weight is same or less than stock, and the overall diameter doesnt get bigger. The bigger the over all diameter gets, the higher it gears your car, meaning it lets you go faster, but you get there slower.
[/b][/quote]

hey cant wait to c that [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/drool.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 09:38 PM
  #8  
emperorjordan's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 14, 2005
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
haha, neither can I. I hadnt seen it on an 05, but Shifty on these forums has them on his, and it is sick as heck. I am not doing mine anytime soon tho, my wheel money will be going to Doug for cams.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 10:01 PM
  #9  
300HPGT's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 25, 2005
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Yeah I have gotten 30,000 miles on my KDW 2's now and have about 1/32nd of a inch left of tread on the rears. I need to replace them soon. But I have liked them much better than my Nitto 555's. They wore a lot less. I am looking at upping the size from 285/30/20's to something wider but its hard to find them for 20's. I wish I could find a 315/25/20
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 11:25 PM
  #10  
Baginoman2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
dang i still dont no what to do between picking tires! [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banghead.gif[/img]

its between the 555's and the BFG's g-force T/A KDW's [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img]

its kind of a looks comparison for me now... [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/headscratch.gif[/img]

Cause in the back the nittos look pretty sweeet..but i dont like them on the front. the BFGs look good in thr front though... hmmmmm

any help?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 04:32 AM
  #11  
MTAS's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 4
From: Tampa FL
A 295/35/18 is shorter than the stock 235/55/17, so your effective gear ratio will be higher numerically [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 07:56 AM
  #12  
Baginoman2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MTAS @ April 24, 2006, 5:35 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
A 295/35/18 is shorter than the stock 235/55/17, so your effective gear ratio will be higher numerically [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]

is that bad..... [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/headscratch.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 08:15 AM
  #13  
MTAS's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 4
From: Tampa FL
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Baginoman2 @ April 24, 2006, 9:59 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
is that bad..... [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/headscratch.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]

Eh, not neceessarily. Here's a formula:

Tire Change (find new gear ratio)

(new tire diameter/old tire diameter) x old axle ratio = new axle ratio

Using this formula, in my case (went to a taller tire):

(27.2/28.5) x 4.10 = 3.91

So if you're going from a stock tire to a shorter one:

(27.2/26.1) x 3.55 = 3.69

So you'll see a slight increase in RPM's through the gears. Maybe a tad quicker off the line, but probably not that noticeable. In my old 96GT I went from 3.27's to 3.73's and wasn't impressed. In the 05, going from 3.55's to 4.10's - BOOYAH [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/icon_mrgreen.gif[/img]

Edit - looking at the formula, I did the calculations wrong [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/headscratch.gif[/img] Heck I'm probably way off base now...crap. I always thought going to a taller tire made the effective rear end gear ratio numerically lower, and a shorter tire made it numerically higher [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/headscratch.gif[/img] Unless that formula is wrong, and I did the calculations correctly by reversing the new/old?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 05:30 PM
  #14  
Baginoman2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MTAS @ April 24, 2006, 9:18 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Eh, not neceessarily. Here's a formula:

Tire Change (find new gear ratio)

(new tire diameter/old tire diameter) x old axle ratio = new axle ratio

Using this formula, in my case (went to a taller tire):

(27.2/28.5) x 4.10 = 3.91

So if you're going from a stock tire to a shorter one:

(27.2/26.1) x 3.55 = 3.69

So you'll see a slight increase in RPM's through the gears. Maybe a tad quicker off the line, but probably not that noticeable. In my old 96GT I went from 3.27's to 3.73's and wasn't impressed. In the 05, going from 3.55's to 4.10's - BOOYAH [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/icon_mrgreen.gif[/img]

Edit - looking at the formula, I did the calculations wrong [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/headscratch.gif[/img] Heck I'm probably way off base now...crap. I always thought going to a taller tire made the effective rear end gear ratio numerically lower, and a shorter tire made it numerically higher [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/headscratch.gif[/img] Unless that formula is wrong, and I did the calculations correctly by reversing the new/old?
[/b][/quote]

interesting [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/eek.gif[/img]
well all in all, it sounds good [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/04.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 08:14 AM
  #15  
Mongoose's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(emperorjordan @ April 23, 2006, 10:02 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I am going 305/35/18 in back on mustang tuning deep dish bullits when I do it. I dont think there is a performance hit as long as the wheel weight is same or less than stock, and the overall diameter doesnt get bigger. The bigger the over all diameter gets, the higher it gears your car, meaning it lets you go faster, but you get there slower.
[/b][/quote]

I thought these would rub the fender. Am I incorrect? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 08:39 AM
  #16  
NOLAGT's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 25, 2005
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(emperorjordan @ April 23, 2006, 10:02 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I am going 305/35/18 in back on mustang tuning deep dish bullits when I do it. I dont think there is a performance hit as long as the wheel weight is same or less than stock, and the overall diameter doesnt get bigger. The bigger the over all diameter gets, the higher it gears your car, meaning it lets you go faster, but you get there slower.
[/b][/quote]


Are the 305's going to be DR's? I want 305's on the back bad too but I am in new orleans and it can rain quite a bit here. Can you safely drive DR's in the rain on the streets.....
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 09:40 AM
  #17  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mongoose @ April 25, 2006, 7:17 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I thought these would rub the fender. Am I incorrect? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]
Depends on the backspacing of the wheel.



<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(NOLAGT @ April 25, 2006, 7:42 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Can you safely drive DR's in the rain on the streets.....
[/b][/quote]
I wouldn't recommend it.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 12:08 PM
  #18  
emperorjordan's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 14, 2005
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
IRT Mongoose and NOLAGT, Shifty has the Nitto 555 305/35/18 in back with eibach springs, and they dont rub. I think it looks kickass. I dont know how well they are in the rain, I know they are a drag radial, but I also know several guys who run them on 99-04s year round in the rain.... just gotta be somewhat careful I guess.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 12:14 PM
  #19  
NOLAGT's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 25, 2005
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Yeah I dont think they will rub I just didint know about the rain part. I have seen lots of people who do it I just dont know how bad it really is. Guess I need to just do it huh lol

Why dont companies like bfg make a 305/18 in the kdw's
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 12:36 PM
  #20  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
Just to clarify, the Nitto 555 is not a drag radial. The Nitto 555R is the drag radial. The 555 does not come in a 305 width, but the 555R drag radial does.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:31 PM.