ZGarske01

got my car dynotuned the other day i was happy with the results for N/A but was a little disapointed in my torque for nitrous mods are in my sig. oh and i used a 100shot

n/a - 329rwhp / 334 rwtq
nitrous was hit at 3350rpms - 403rwhp / 433rwtq

this was on a mustang dyno i may add...now im ready to finally go to the track

for dyno graph see post #10

Cleveland

None of those figures are off. What were you expecting? If you want higher torque figures simply activate the nitrous at a lower RPM (3000)

-Dan

ZGarske01

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Cleveland @ May 3, 2006, 10:26 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
None of those figures are off. What were you expecting? If you want higher torque figures simply activate the nitrous at a lower RPM (3000)

-Dan
[/b][/quote]

thats what i figured ... from looking at some other peoples graphs they were making peak tq. around 3000

Cleveland

well, if you were to look at my posted graph from last month's dyno runs you will notice peak torque at about 3650 or whatever but thats with an activation point of 3500 on the dot.

The solenoids, the design of the nozzle, its location in the intake track, the bottle pressure, there are quite a few variables that will result in different power outputs compared to others.

If you can post those charts that would be cool. If not, compare point to point from NA to N2O to see where your gains were, peak numbers isnt always the most important.

Im trying here people, life is better, I dont want to be known as a jerk any longer. If someone reads something differently than I intended it to read and I get flamed Im not going to argue the point. K? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]

-Dan

ZGarske01

alrighty then.... let me take some pictures of my graphs i'll have them up in a few . all my runs were back to back so no cool down time either

emperorjordan

dan, you are only a jerk sometimes to some people... .personally, I really appreciate all your help you have given me.

4511.21

That sounds good to me. I thought mine was a little low for what I have now. Maybe it is a conservative tune...
NA I'm at 299.11 rwhp & 313.50 rwtq

Running a 75 shot I'm getting 354.23 rwhp & 403.47 rwtq

Does this sound low to you for my mods? Ran on a Dynojet at MD Motorsports.

don_w

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(emperorjordan @ May 3, 2006, 8:52 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
dan, you are only a jerk sometimes to some people... .personally, I really appreciate all your help you have given me.
[/b][/quote]


Even if Dan is a jerk, I still like him! [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrinjester.gif[/img]

Cleveland

Im just another equal opportunity e-thug on a manifest destiny. Some people will never get to know the real me, the Cali folks will though. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]

Like I have posted, I need to know a point to point comparison with NA and N2O to comment on power output.

The only thing that could cause low results is with torque management still engaged on an automatic application. Get rid of that and you'll be golden, thats why custom tuning is especially important.

-Dan

ZGarske01

heres the na dyno [attachmentid=48285]

heres the nitrous[attachmentid=48286]

Cleveland

yep, the results are fine. Looks real nice. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]

Im amazed with your NA numbers but thats probably has a little to do with the transmission differences and your stock gear ratio. How was the AF on that 100 shot run?

-Dan

tom281

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ZGarske01 @ May 3, 2006, 11:21 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
got my car dynotuned the other day i was happy with the results for N/A but was a little disapointed in my torque for nitrous mods are in my sig. oh and i used a 100shot

n/a - 329rwhp / 334 rwtq
nitrous was hit at 3350rpms - 403rwhp / 433rwtq

this was on a mustang dyno i may add...now im ready to finally go to the track

for dyno graph see post #10
[/b][/quote]


I would wonder if you're not seeing as much of a gain as you want to see based on the fact that your NA numbers are so high. 329/334 on a MUSTANG dyno seem pretty high for a car with those mods. Thats what, about 370 horse at a 12% drivetrain loss? Does anyone else think those numbers sound especially good?

Not trying to call b.s. here, it just seems like the NA numbers are very surprising.

y22kc

Those N/A numbers look very good.

4511.21

Could these improve? The red is nitrous and blue is NA.

speco2005

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Cleveland @ May 3, 2006, 9:46 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
well, if you were to look at my posted graph from last month's dyno runs you will notice peak torque at about 3650 or whatever but thats with an activation point of 3500 on the dot.

The solenoids, the design of the nozzle, its location in the intake track, the bottle pressure, there are quite a few variables that will result in different power outputs compared to others.

If you can post those charts that would be cool. If not, compare point to point from NA to N2O to see where your gains were, peak numbers isnt always the most important.

Im trying here people, life is better, I dont want to be known as a jerk any longer. If someone reads something differently than I intended it to read and I get flamed Im not going to argue the point. K? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]

-Dan
[/b][/quote]
Dan I dig your posts, and second you answered a question for me that I have asked but no one chimed in on. That being the location of my nozzles, I am moving them closer to my intake from the 12-13 inches they are now and see how that does me.

max2000jp

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(tom281 @ May 4, 2006, 6:30 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
329/334 on a MUSTANG dyno seem pretty high for a car with those mods. Thats what, about 370 horse at a 12% drivetrain loss? [/b][/quote]


I thought they were high too. Mustangs read lower than dynojets. On a dyno jet those numbers would be 340ish.

ZGarske01

im aware of the differences in dyno jet vs. mustang dyno and i agree my numbers are high but at the same time im supporting them with graphs and in correlation to my nitrous numbers they dont seem off

300HPGT

I always thought that mustang dynos read higher HP readings and lower torque reading. I have never dyno'd on one so I wouldnt know.

Cleveland

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(4511.21 @ May 4, 2006, 8:24 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Could these improve? The red is nitrous and blue is NA.
[/b][/quote]
Those numbers look good, point to point is right on.

I suggest the 100-125 shot now, just take out timing and put it back on the dyno.

-Dan

jp's performance

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ZGarske01 @ May 3, 2006, 9:21 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
got my car dynotuned the other day i was happy with the results for N/A but was a little disapointed in my torque for nitrous mods are in my sig. oh and i used a 100shot

n/a - 329rwhp / 334 rwtq
nitrous was hit at 3350rpms - 403rwhp / 433rwtq

this was on a mustang dyno i may add...now im ready to finally go to the track

for dyno graph see post #10
[/b][/quote]nice numbers,i see my zex kit did you right,should put you in the mid to high 11's,on a sticky tire. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrinjester.gif[/img]