computer tuning site
I got 23 RWHP. And, no the AUTO's arte NOT screwed. Mine shifts harder, the shifts points were raised to 9000 RPM's and the Fule Cutoff at 6000 RPM was removed.
We are not screwed, we are saved
w00t!
We are not screwed, we are saved
w00t!
Originally posted by 2005RedGT@November 28, 2004, 6:38 PM
I got 23 RWHP. And, no the AUTO's arte NOT screwed. Mine shifts harder, the shifts points were raised to 9000 RPM's and the Fule Cutoff at 6000 RPM was removed.
We are not screwed, we are saved
w00t!
I got 23 RWHP. And, no the AUTO's arte NOT screwed. Mine shifts harder, the shifts points were raised to 9000 RPM's and the Fule Cutoff at 6000 RPM was removed.
We are not screwed, we are saved
w00t!
Originally posted by 2005RedGT@November 28, 2004, 7:43 PM
yes, 18 from default flash from SCT, then tweaked to 23
Howver, the tuner believs he can squeeze another 8-10 out of it with some timing, injector tweaks and other things I didn't understand
yes, 18 from default flash from SCT, then tweaked to 23
Howver, the tuner believs he can squeeze another 8-10 out of it with some timing, injector tweaks and other things I didn't understand
Just one bit of correction on the CPU. It is NOT the same one in a Macintosh. It is related (sort of the same family from a base instruction set sort of way), but not the same one. It uses the current best MPU: the Motorola MPC555 (or one of it's variants) MPU.
That thing absolutely kicks butt! You will find that almost ALL the new CPUs from just about every single auto maker (and even Mercury Marine) are using this chip in their new engine controllers. About 2 years ago I was part of a group looking to design a DIY EFI system based on this chip. You would not beleive what it is capable of. Plus, it has SO much hardware functions integrated into the core (analog to digital converters, digital to analog converters, flash memory for program storage 32+ TPU channels (Time processor units), etc) that it makes ECU design almost simple. The programming is more complex simply because there are so many resources to control, but it is WELL worth it. Unfortunately, the DIY EFI project with the MCU555 never saw light of day, but it sure was fun working on it and learning about the different bits and pieces.
That thing absolutely kicks butt! You will find that almost ALL the new CPUs from just about every single auto maker (and even Mercury Marine) are using this chip in their new engine controllers. About 2 years ago I was part of a group looking to design a DIY EFI system based on this chip. You would not beleive what it is capable of. Plus, it has SO much hardware functions integrated into the core (analog to digital converters, digital to analog converters, flash memory for program storage 32+ TPU channels (Time processor units), etc) that it makes ECU design almost simple. The programming is more complex simply because there are so many resources to control, but it is WELL worth it. Unfortunately, the DIY EFI project with the MCU555 never saw light of day, but it sure was fun working on it and learning about the different bits and pieces.
If you want to read about the 4.10 gears and the SCT Excalibrator experience as well as the dyno info, I have it all documented here (see page 4 for the Dyno/Tune). If you cannot find your answers there, just PM me.
Nice info 2005RedGT! So your base dyno was at 232 RWHP? That seems a little low even with the variables in different dynos/air pressure/etc... I'm glad you got more hp with your mods! Keep up us updated! Thanks!
Originally posted by RRRoamer@November 29, 2004, 12:11 AM
Just one bit of correction on the CPU. It is NOT the same one in a Macintosh. It is related (sort of the same family from a base instruction set sort of way), but not the same one. It uses the current best MPU: the Motorola MPC555 (or one of it's variants) MPU.
That thing absolutely kicks butt! You will find that almost ALL the new CPUs from just about every single auto maker (and even Mercury Marine) are using this chip in their new engine controllers. About 2 years ago I was part of a group looking to design a DIY EFI system based on this chip. You would not beleive what it is capable of. Plus, it has SO much hardware functions integrated into the core (analog to digital converters, digital to analog converters, flash memory for program storage 32+ TPU channels (Time processor units), etc) that it makes ECU design almost simple. The programming is more complex simply because there are so many resources to control, but it is WELL worth it. Unfortunately, the DIY EFI project with the MCU555 never saw light of day, but it sure was fun working on it and learning about the different bits and pieces.
Just one bit of correction on the CPU. It is NOT the same one in a Macintosh. It is related (sort of the same family from a base instruction set sort of way), but not the same one. It uses the current best MPU: the Motorola MPC555 (or one of it's variants) MPU.
That thing absolutely kicks butt! You will find that almost ALL the new CPUs from just about every single auto maker (and even Mercury Marine) are using this chip in their new engine controllers. About 2 years ago I was part of a group looking to design a DIY EFI system based on this chip. You would not beleive what it is capable of. Plus, it has SO much hardware functions integrated into the core (analog to digital converters, digital to analog converters, flash memory for program storage 32+ TPU channels (Time processor units), etc) that it makes ECU design almost simple. The programming is more complex simply because there are so many resources to control, but it is WELL worth it. Unfortunately, the DIY EFI project with the MCU555 never saw light of day, but it sure was fun working on it and learning about the different bits and pieces.
Still sounds cool to say the cars runs the same Processor as a G4/iBook/PowerBook.

Thanks for the info!
Originally posted by 2005RedGT@November 28, 2004, 5:38 PM
I got 23 RWHP. And, no the AUTO's arte NOT screwed. Mine shifts harder, the shifts points were raised to 9000 RPM's and the Fule Cutoff at 6000 RPM was removed.
We are not screwed, we are saved
w00t!
I got 23 RWHP. And, no the AUTO's arte NOT screwed. Mine shifts harder, the shifts points were raised to 9000 RPM's and the Fule Cutoff at 6000 RPM was removed.
We are not screwed, we are saved
w00t!
This is awesome stuff.
Congrats on the PCM mods!
Once I pull mine out of the garage when spring arrives, I'll be doing the same thing.
Hopefully the aftermarket will have more toys to screw with the PCM by then.
Wow This computer stuff is so far over my head that I got left at the starting line.
I know I am a has been for sure now. I am fortunate to have the coins to hire the
expert to do it for me. Before long these things will be in lawnmowers too. I know the newer one do have a chip. Do we have California to thank for this too?
I know I am a has been for sure now. I am fortunate to have the coins to hire the
expert to do it for me. Before long these things will be in lawnmowers too. I know the newer one do have a chip. Do we have California to thank for this too?
Originally posted by 2005RedGT@November 28, 2004, 5:38 PM
I got 23 RWHP. And, no the AUTO's arte NOT screwed. Mine shifts harder, the shifts points were raised to 9000 RPM's and the Fule Cutoff at 6000 RPM was removed.
We are not screwed, we are saved
w00t!
I got 23 RWHP. And, no the AUTO's arte NOT screwed. Mine shifts harder, the shifts points were raised to 9000 RPM's and the Fule Cutoff at 6000 RPM was removed.
We are not screwed, we are saved
w00t!
If you blow this thing up at nine grand how are you going to explain this to the service manager? Have you found a way to by pass the history box?
Thanks for the info.
Yes 23HP gain, removed the the fuel shut-off at 6000RPM. The point at which it cuts the fuel is 9000 - basically a point it will never reach.
It was a way to simply 'never' hit the fuel cut points. However, the tranny still shifts normally (a bit stiffer now). We did tweak each shift, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, and raised them a bit.
It was a way to simply 'never' hit the fuel cut points. However, the tranny still shifts normally (a bit stiffer now). We did tweak each shift, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, and raised them a bit.
Originally posted by Mongoose@November 30, 2004, 6:25 PM
I will move the fuel cut off up but not to 9000. I have blown two engines in the past and would rather have a safety zone. Please tell us what your new shift points are.
I will move the fuel cut off up but not to 9000. I have blown two engines in the past and would rather have a safety zone. Please tell us what your new shift points are.
Originally posted by max2000jp+November 30, 2004, 3:37 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (max2000jp @ November 30, 2004, 3:37 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mongoose@November 30, 2004, 6:25 PM
I will move the fuel cut off up but not to 9000. I have blown two engines in the past and would rather have a safety zone. Please tell us what your new shift points are.
I will move the fuel cut off up but not to 9000. I have blown two engines in the past and would rather have a safety zone. Please tell us what your new shift points are.
What he said!



