GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Comparison of the stock intake VS WMS 80/95 on the dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10/29/06, 12:08 PM
  #1  
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
 
Doug@C&L's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2004
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Comparison of the stock intake VS WMS 80/95 on the dyno

I've made this post in responce to another members questions about if the stock airbox flows good enough for the engine or if a aftermarket CAI will make more power.

The below graph shows the stock airbox VS the WMS 80 VS the WMS 95 kit on my car. The only tuning done is to correct the a/f using the 80 and 95mm kit. No timing adjustments were made. You can see that the 95 has no advantage over the 80 because it flows just to well for the stock engine but do some airflow mods and you'll see the gain of the 95 over the 80.

You can see a clear gain of 10rwhp and 12 rwtq at 4500 rpm's and nearly the same for the rest of the RPM range.
Attached Thumbnails Comparison of the stock intake VS WMS 80/95 on the dyno-wmsvsstock0.jpg  
Old 10/29/06, 05:31 PM
  #2  
Mach 1 Member
 
05-1947's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 10, 2005
Location: Sarasota
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice gains, but I just am not a fan of the look.

BTW, how is the car running with the cams?
Old 10/29/06, 08:45 PM
  #3  
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
 
Doug@C&L's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2004
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 05-1947
Nice gains, but I just am not a fan of the look.

BTW, how is the car running with the cams?
Yeah, I just posted this for the numbers for metro. Doing well, it made 25 more rwhp uptop, mainly over 4000 rpm's. Still idles like stock though.

Thanks, Doug.
Old 10/29/06, 09:05 PM
  #4  
I lust for a M24
 
05GT-O.C.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: November 6, 2004
Location: Football HOF, Canton OH
Posts: 7,045
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Thanks for posting. That's always interesting to see. I'm not a fan of the look of the Roush, but wouldn't knock it as a good car.
Old 10/29/06, 11:02 PM
  #5  
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
 
Doug@C&L's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2004
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahh come on, what's not to like??? I had the 3d-carbon stripes added to mine...
Attached Thumbnails Comparison of the stock intake VS WMS 80/95 on the dyno-front3.jpg   Comparison of the stock intake VS WMS 80/95 on the dyno-side1.jpg  
Old 10/30/06, 08:53 AM
  #6  
Mach 1 Member
 
05-1947's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 10, 2005
Location: Sarasota
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 05GT-O.C.D.
Thanks for posting. That's always interesting to see. I'm not a fan of the look of the Roush, but wouldn't knock it as a good car.

Was this directed to me?

I wasn't really knocking it, but actually stating my opinion. I know that it is a good intake, but I think it leaves a large looking hole where the stock intake is.

Old 10/30/06, 09:51 AM
  #7  
GT Member
 
V8Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2006
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 05-1947
I know that it is a good intake, but I think it leaves a large looking hole where the stock intake is.
I was wondering about that in regards to the WMS. I always thought it looked pretty sweet overall, but I've never seen a picture showing the whole engine compartment. I assumed that it would just leave a huge empty space where the stock airbox used to be. Somehow every time someone posts a picture of theirs they manage to crop out that front driver side corner of the engine compartment. I imagine it would ruin the balanced look under the hood. Any thoughts (or better, pics) from anyone who has it?
Old 10/30/06, 10:32 AM
  #8  
I lust for a M24
 
05GT-O.C.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: November 6, 2004
Location: Football HOF, Canton OH
Posts: 7,045
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 05-1947
Was this directed to me?

I wasn't really knocking it, but actually stating my opinion. I know that it is a good intake, but I think it leaves a large looking hole where the stock intake is.

Sorry bro, I was just in a bad mood and easily irritated yesterday.

FYI - with the ram air tray and coolant bottle relocated, there is no longer a hole.
Old 10/30/06, 03:04 PM
  #9  
V6 Member
 
zoomerman46's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 23, 2004
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to go to far adrift with the WMS racing CAI but here is a picture of my my Black GT with the WMS CAI and the Saleen Super Charger a great combo once I get it setup right Waiting on the 95 MM MAF from WMS ,Have the 39lb injectors and the 3.6 pulley. Wasn't happy with the stock setup Pulled 331 rwhp and 333 torque on a Mustang Dyno but max out the 80 MAF and the injector duty cyle was about 90%.So it's back to the dyno a soon as the new parts are put in.
Attached Thumbnails Comparison of the stock intake VS WMS 80/95 on the dyno-img_0038-large-.jpg  
Old 10/30/06, 10:44 PM
  #10  
V6 Member
 
Silverfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 14, 2006
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's another one......I like this look over a bent pipe.
Old 10/30/06, 10:49 PM
  #11  
V6 Member
 
Silverfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 14, 2006
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old 10/31/06, 04:03 AM
  #12  
Bullitt Member
 
GT John's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 16, 2006
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by V8Mike
I was wondering about that in regards to the WMS. I always thought it looked pretty sweet overall, but I've never seen a picture showing the whole engine compartment. I assumed that it would just leave a huge empty space where the stock airbox used to be. Somehow every time someone posts a picture of theirs they manage to crop out that front driver side corner of the engine compartment. I imagine it would ruin the balanced look under the hood. Any thoughts (or better, pics) from anyone who has it?

The installation of the WMS does not leave a big hole (except in your wallet).
The engine compartment looks more balanced with the WMS.
Attached Thumbnails Comparison of the stock intake VS WMS 80/95 on the dyno-p1000101-small-.jpg  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mustangsally_
2010-2014 Mustang
21
9/18/15 05:35 AM
M3hunter
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
5
9/10/15 09:26 AM
dbent15
Fox Mustangs
4
9/5/15 12:15 PM
JTB
Motorsports
1
9/3/15 10:50 AM



Quick Reply: Comparison of the stock intake VS WMS 80/95 on the dyno



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:25 PM.